Antitumour efficacy of MEK inhibitors in human lung cancer cells and their derivatives with acquired resistance to different tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: To study the molecular mechanisms regulating cancer cell resistance to four different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs): erlotinib, gefitinib, vandetanib and sorafenib. METHODS: An in vitro model of acquired resistance to these TKIs was developed by continuously treating the human lung adenocarcinoma cell line CALU-3 with escalating doses of each drug. Transcriptional profiling was performed with Agilent whole genome microarrays. Western blot analysis, enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cell proliferation, migration, invasion and anchorage-independent colony growth assays were conducted in vitro and experiments with established xenografts in athymic nude mice were performed in vivo in parental (P) and TKI-resistant (R) CALU-3 cell lines. RESULTS: As compared with P-CALU-3 cells, in TKI-R CALU-3 cell lines a significant increase in the expression of activated, phosphorylated MET, IGF-1R, AKT, MEK, MAPK and of survivin was observed. Downregulation of E-cadherin and amphiregulin mRNAs and upregulation of vimentin, VE-cadherin, HIF-1α and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 mRNAs were observed in all four TKI-R CALU-3 cell lines. All four TKI-R CALU-3 cells showed increased invasion, migration and anchorage-independent growth. Together, these data suggest epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) in TKI-R CALU-3 cells. Treatment with several agents that target AKT, MET or IGF-1R did not affect TKI-R CALU-3 cell proliferation. In contrast, treatment with MSC19363669B and selumetinib, two selective MEK inhibitors, caused inhibition of cell proliferation, invasion, migration, anchorage-independent growth in vitro and of tumour growth in vivo of all four TKI-R CALU-3 cell lines. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that resistance to four different TKIs is characterised by EMT, which is MEK-inhibitor sensitive in human CALU-3 lung adenocarcinoma.

A multicenter phase II study of induction chemotherapy with FOLFOX-4 and cetuximab followed by radiation and cetuximab in locally advanced oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves the survival of patients with oesophageal cancer when compared with surgery alone. METHODS: We conducted a phase II, multicenter trial of FOLFOX-4 and cetuximab in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer (LAEC) followed by daily radiotherapy (180 cGy fractions to 5040 cGy) with concurrent weekly cetuximab. Cytokines levels potentially related to cetuximab efficacy were assessed using multiplex-bead assays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at baseline, at week 8 and at week 17. Primary end point was complete pathological response rate (pCR). RESULTS: In all, 41 patients were enroled. Among 30 patients who underwent surgery, a pCR was observed in 8 patients corresponding to a rate of 27%. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity was skin (30%) and neutropenia (30%). The 36-month survival rates were 85 and 52% in patients with pathological CR or PR vs 38 and 33% in patients with SD or PD. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating cetuximab into a preoperative regimen for LAEC is feasible; no correlation between cytokines changes and patient outcome was observed. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography study even if influenced by the small number of patients appears to be able to predict patients outcome both as early and late metabolic response.

Sorafenib in combination with erlotinib or with gemcitabine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is a small-molecule multitargeted kinase inhibitor that blocks the activation of C-RAF, B-RAF, c-KIT, FLT-3, RET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), VEGFR-3 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor ß. The aim of this multicenter, randomized phase II study was to evaluate clinical activity and safety of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib or gemcitabine in unselected untreated elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The trial was designed to select the most promising sorafenib-containing combination in previously untreated elderly (≥70 years) stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients, with performance status of zero to two. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following combinations: gemcitabine, 1200 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8, every 21 days, for a maximum of six cycles, plus sorafenib, 800 mg/day, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (arm 1); or erlotinib, 150 mg/day, plus sorafenib, 800 mg/day, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (arm 2). A selection design was applied with 1-year survival rate as the primary end point of the study, requiring 58 patients. RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomly allocated to the study (31 patients in arm 1 and 29 patients in arm 2). After a median follow-up of 15 months, 10 patients [32%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 49%] in arm 1 and 13 patients (45%, 95% CI 27% to 63%) in arm 2 were alive at 1 year. Median overall survival was 6.6 and 12.6 months in arm 1 and arm 2, respectively. Observed toxic effects were consistent with the expected drug profiles. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of erlotinib and sorafenib was feasible in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC and was associated with a higher 1-year survival rate than the other arm. According to the selection design, this combination warrants further investigation in phase III trials.