Safety of mFOLFOX6/XELOX as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of stage III colon cancer: phase II clinical study (The FACOS study).

PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin combined with a fluoropyrimidine derivative is widely accepted as standard therapy for patients with stage III colon cancer, since few clinical data are available for Japanese patients. The FACOS trial investigated the tolerability of modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) and XELOX regimens in Japanese colon cancer patients. METHODS: Twelve cycles of mFOLFOX6 or 8 cycles of XELOX were given to patients with eligibility: stage III curatively resected colon cancer, performance status of 0-1, age from 20 to 75 years, and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and the completion rate of study therapy. RESULTS: From April 2010 to April 2014, a total of 132 patients were enrolled. Safety was analyzed in 130 patients, with finalized data from 73 patients receiving mFOLFOX6 and 57 patients receiving XELOX. A total of 130 patients (100%) experienced AEs (any grade), and 52 patients (40.0%) experienced AEs of grade ≥ 3. No significant difference in the frequency of grade ≥ 3 AEs was observed between mFOLFOX6 and XELOX groups. Continuation of the planned cycle rate of protocol treatment was 69.9% in the mFOLFOX6 group and 68.4% in the XELOX group. Treatment was discontinued because of AEs in 14 patients (19.2%) in the mFOLFOX6 group and 8 (14.0%) in the XELOX group. Mean relative dose intensity for oxaliplatin was 78.0% in the mFOLFOX6 group and 82.8% in the XELOX group. CONCLUSION: As adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer, mFOLFOX6/XELOX regimens are acceptable.

Eppikajutsuto Protects against Food Allergy Induced by Ovalbumin in a Murine Model.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no efficient medications available for the prevention and treatment of food allergy (FA). Herbal medicines, including traditional Japanese Kampo medicines (TJKMs), are promising therapeutic drugs. METHODS: We screened 18 TJKMs for treatment of FA symptoms in a mouse FA model induced by ovalbumin (OVA). BALB/c mice were sensitized intraperitoneally by an OVA/aluminum hydroxide gel mixture followed by 4 booster doses of oral OVA and FA symptom induction by 50 mg of OVA. TJKMs were orally administered for 28 days from the day of sensitization to the day before FA symptom induction. Evaluated FA symptoms included a decrease in body temperature and allergic diarrhea. Allergic sensitization was determined by plasma OVA-specific IgE levels. Cytokine mRNA levels in mesenteric lymph nodes, plasma mouse mast cell protease-1, and the number of mast cells in the small and large intestines were analyzed. Additionally, the therapeutic effect of the TJKM eppikajutsuto (EJT) on mast cell degranulation was determined in active anaphylaxis and passive cutaneous anaphylaxis models. RESULTS: EJT effectively prevented FA symptoms. Although OVA-specific IgE levels and the intestinal mast cell numbers were not different between the EJT-treated and untreated FA mice, plasma mMcpt1 and IL-4 levels were lower in EJT-treated FA mice than untreated FA mice. EJT could alleviate symptoms in both active and passive anaphylaxis models. CONCLUSION: EJT prevented OVA-induced FA symptoms in a mouse model, suggesting that EJT might exert its therapeutic activity via IL-4 suppression and the inhibition of mucosal mast cell degranulation.

Modulated electro-hyperthermia enhances dendritic cell therapy through an abscopal effect in mice.

The aim of this study was to assess whether modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) can induce an abscopal effect and thereby enhance the antitumor effects of immunotherapy. We used an intratumoral dendritic cell (DC) injection and mEHT to treat C3H/He mice inoculated with squamous cell carcinoma SCCVII cells in the left leg, and we assessed the whole body antitumor effects. Tumors were examined every two or three days in order to assess growth inhibition. The tumor-draining lymph nodes were removed to enable flow cytometric analysis of CD3+ and CD8+ cells, whereas immunohistochemistry was used to assess CD8, S100 and Foxp3 expression in the tumors. Additionally, GP96 expression in the tumors from the different treatment groups was measured. In the control group, the mean tumor volume was larger than that in other groups. These results indicated that the combination therapy of an intratumoral DC injection and mEHT evoked systemic antitumor activity. A larger number of CD3+ and CD8+ cells were detected by flow cytometric analysis in the DC plus mEHT treatment group. Tumor tissue immunostaining showed that CD8 and S100 were more strongly expressed in the DC plus mEHT treatment group, although Foxp3 expression was much higher in the control group. The GP96 gene expression level in the mEHT group was significantly different from the expression level in the control group. An abscopal effect may be induced by mEHT, and the effect of immunotherapy with DCs was strongly enhanced by the overexpression of GP96. GP96 is thought to be one of the molecules explaining the abscopal effect. Direct intratumoral administration of DCs and mEHT may be a feasible future treatment strategy.

Histone deacetylase inhibitor FK228 activates tumor suppressor Prdx1 with apoptosis induction in esophageal cancer cells.

PURPOSE: The histone deacetylase inhibitor FK228 shows strong activity as a potent antitumor drug but its precise mechanism is still obscure. The purpose of this study is to reveal the effect of FK228 on gene expression in the cell and to determine the mechanism of the antitumor activity of FK228 for further clinical applications. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND RESULTS: Microarray analysis was applied to verify the gene expression profiles of 4,608 genes after FK228 treatment using human esophageal squamous cell cancer cell lines T.Tn and TE2. Among them, peroxiredoxin 1 (Prdx1), a member of the peroxiredoxin family of antioxidant enzymes having cell growth suppression activity, as well as p21(WAF1), were significantly activated by FK288. In addition, FK228 strongly inhibited the cell growth of T.Tn and TE2 by the induction of apoptosis. Further, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that FK228 induced the accumulation of acetylated histones H3 and H4 in Prdx1 promoter, including the Sp1-binding site. In mouse xenograft models of T.Tn and TE2 cells, FK228 injection resulted in significant tumor regression as well as activated Prdx1 expression in tumor tissues. Prdx1 suppression by RNA interference hindered the antitumor effect of FK228. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the antitumor effect of FK228 in esophageal cancer cells is shown at least in part through Prdx1 activation by modulating acetylation of histones in the promoter, resulting in tumor growth inhibition with apoptosis induction.