RESUMO
The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re-evaluating the safety of calcium silicate (E 552), magnesium silicate (E 553a) and talc (E 553b) when used as food additives. In 1991, the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) established a group acceptable daily intake (ADI) 'not specified' for silicon dioxide and silicates. The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) recently provided a scientific opinion re-evaluating the safety of silicon dioxide (E 551) when used as a food additive. The Panel noted that the absorption of silicates and talc was very low; there was no indication for genotoxicity or developmental toxicity for calcium and magnesium silicate and talc; and no confirmed cases of kidney effects have been found in the EudraVigilance database despite the wide and long-term use of high doses of magnesium trisilicate up to 4 g/person per day over decades. However, the Panel considered that accumulation of silicon from calcium silicate in the kidney and liver was reported in rats, and reliable data on subchronic and chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity of silicates and talc were lacking. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the safety of calcium silicate (E 552), magnesium silicate (E 553a(i)), magnesium trisilicate (E 553a(ii)) and talc (E 553b) when used as food additives cannot be assessed. The Panel considered that there is no mechanistic rationale for a group ADI for silicates and silicon dioxide and the group ADI established by the SCF is obsolete. Based on the food supplement scenario considered as the most representative for risk characterisation, exposure to silicates (E 552-553) for all population groups was below the maximum daily dose of magnesium trisilicate used as an antacid (4 g/person per day). The Panel noted that there were a number of approaches, which could decrease the uncertainties in the current toxicological database. These approaches include - but are not limited to - toxicological studies as recommended for a Tier 1 approach as described in the EFSA Guidance for the submission of food additives and conducted with an adequately characterised material. Some recommendations for the revision of the EU specifications were proposed by the Panel.
RESUMO
Natural peloids from sulfurous thermal springs are largely used in cosmetic and pelotherapy for the treatment of different dermatological conditions, including skin aging, dermatitis, and other eczemas. The beneficial effects are correlated to mineralogical and other thermal properties, as well as to the presence of natural substances with specific antioxidant activity. Few data are available for the comparison between natural peloids and synthetic (i.e., artificially maturated) muds. In this context, the natural substances and antioxidant activity of natural white mud (WM) and dark mud (DM) peloids from the sulfurous thermal spring pool Bagnaccio (Viterbo, Italy) have been studied in detail to evaluate possible relationships between physicochemical properties and therapeutic effect. A large panel of natural substances in WM and DM were characterized for the first time by ³¹P-nuclear magnetic resonance and gas chromatography associated to mass spectrometry analysis. Polar fractions of WM and DM peloids were characterized by the presence of several bioactive natural compounds, showing high antioxidant activity and DNA protective effect, as evaluated by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay, and hydrogen peroxideinduced DNA breakage in the alkaline comet assay. The antioxidant activity and DNA protective effect could be attributed to radical scavenging rather than a modulatory effect on the induced DNA repair, and are of order of intensity higher than that reported for synthetic muds.