Mannitol versus furosemide in patients with thoracic malignancies who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy using short hydration: A randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Mannitol is exclusively recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for diuresis in cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemotherapy. The utility of furosemide, a widely used and convenient diuretic, thus requires clarification. METHODS: This is a prospective, single-centered, open-label, noninferiority phase II study. Patients with thoracic malignancies who planned to receive CDDP-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either mannitol (arm A) or furosemide (arm B). The primary end point was set as the proportion of patients who experienced any grade of "creatinine (Cr) increased" based on the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) during the first cycle as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. Secondary end points were Cr increased based on the baseline value during the first cycle, Cr increased after the completion of CDDP, and the proportion of patients with phlebitis. RESULTS: Between April 2018 and March 2022, 115 patients were enrolled and 106 were analyzed. Any grade of Cr increased based on the ULN during the first cycle was 17.3% (arm A) and 24.1% (arm B), respectively (p = 0.34). Therefore, the primary end point was not met. After completion of chemotherapy, any grade of Cr increased was observed in 23.1% (arm A) and 31.5% (arm B), respectively. However, the actual serum Cr level and Cr clearance during the courses were not different between the arms. Phlebitis occurred more frequently in arm A (28.8%) than arm B (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Mannitol should remain the standard diuresis in CDDP-based chemotherapy assessed by conventional CTCAE grading, but furosemide can be room for consideration when assessed by actual serum Cr level and Cr clearance.

Considerations about the Use of a Loading Dose of Daptomycin in a Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection.

Previous clinical studies have showed the clinical benefits of the initiation of treatment with a daptomycin (DAP) loading dose, but only a few studies have evaluated its antimicrobial benefits. We evaluated the efficacy of a DAP loading dose against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Three MRSA isolates (DAP MIC: 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/L) were tested. Four DAP regimens simulating human concentration-time profiles, i.e., (i) day 1: 8 mg/kg and day 2: 6 mg/kg, (ii) days 1 and 2: 6 mg/kg/day, (iii) day 1: 8 mg/kg and day 2: 4 mg/kg, and (iv) days 1 and 2: 4 mg/kg/day, were administered to the mice. Efficacy was calculated as the change in bacterial density. DAP loading-dose regimen iii showed greater antimicrobial activity against MRSA with MIC 1 mg/L than nonloading regimen iv (-3.10 ± 0.63 vs. -0.71 ± 0.34 log10 CFU; p < 0.01). Loading-dose regimen iii achieved greater log10 CFU changes than nonloading regimen ii, while the total DAP dose for 2 days was the same (-3.10 ± 0.63 vs. -1.46 ± 0.48 log10 CFU; p < 0.05). DAP loading-dose regimen iii showed enhanced antimicrobial activity against MRSA with DAP MIC 0.5 mg/L when compared with nonloading regimen iv. However, loading-dose regimens i and iii did not reduce bacterial density for MRSA with DAP MIC 2 mg/L. Our data suggest that a DAP loading-dose regimen would be an advantageous procedure for patients infected with MRSA with DAP MIC ≤1 mg/L.