Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mol Pharm ; 18(5): 1895-1904, 2021 05 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33886332

RESUMO

Intestinal efflux transporters affect the gastrointestinal processing of many drugs but further data on their intestinal expression levels are required. Relative mRNA expression and relative and absolute protein expression data of transporters are commonly measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Western blot and mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics techniques. All of these methods, however, have their own strengths and limitations, and therefore, validation for optimized quantification methods is needed. As such, the identification of the most appropriate technique is necessary to effectively translate preclinical findings to first-in-human trials. In this study, the mRNA expression and protein levels of the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in jejunal and ileal epithelia of 30 male and female human subjects, and the duodenal, jejunal, ileal and colonic tissues in 48 Wistar rats were quantified using RT-PCR, Western blot and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). A similar sex difference was observed in the expression of small intestinal P-gp in humans and Wistar rats where P-gp was higher in males than females with an increasing trend from the proximal to the distal parts in both species. A strong positive linear correlation was determined between the Western blot data and LC-MS/MS data in the small intestine of humans (R2 = 0.85). Conflicting results, however, were shown in rat small intestinal and colonic P-gp expression between the techniques (R2 = 0.29 and 0.05, respectively). In RT-PCR and Western blot, an internal reference protein is experimentally required; here, beta-actin was used which is innately variable along the intestinal tract. Quantification via LC-MS/MS can provide data on P-gp expression without the need for an internal reference protein and consequently, can give higher confidence on the expression levels of P-gp along the intestinal tract. Overall, these findings highlight similar trends between the species and suggest that the Wistar rat is an appropriate preclinical animal model to predict the oral drug absorption of P-gp substrates in the human small intestine.


Assuntos
Subfamília B de Transportador de Cassetes de Ligação de ATP/análise , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Subfamília B de Transportador de Cassetes de Ligação de ATP/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Duodeno/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Íleo/metabolismo , Absorção Intestinal , Jejuno/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ratos , Fatores Sexuais , Especificidade da Espécie , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem
2.
Eur J Pharm Sci ; 42(1-2): 3-10, 2011 Jan 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20932902

RESUMO

Laboratory animals are often used in drug delivery and research. However, basic information about their gastrointestinal pH, fluid volume, and lymphoid tissue is not completely known. We have investigated these post-mortem in healthy guinea pigs, rabbits and pigs, to assess their suitability for pre-clinical studies by comparing the results with reported human literature. The mean gastric pH (fed ad libitum) was 2.9 and 4.4 in guinea pig and pig, respectively. In contrast, a very low pH (1.6) was recorded in the rabbits. The small intestinal pH was found in the range of 6.4-7.4 in the guinea pigs and rabbits, whereas lower pH (6.1-6.7) was recorded in the pig, which may have consequences for ionisable or pH responsive systems when tested in pig. A relatively lower pH than in the small intestine was found in the caecum (6.0-6.4) and colon (6.1-6.6) of the guinea pig, rabbit and the pig. The water content in the gastrointestinal tract of guinea pig, rabbit and pig was 51g, 153g and 1546g, respectively. When normalized to the body weight, the guinea pig, had larger amounts of water compared to the rabbit and the pig (guinea pig>rabbit>pig); in contrast, a reverse order was found when normalized to per unit length of the gut (guinea pig

Assuntos
Líquidos Corporais/química , Desenho de Fármacos , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Trato Gastrointestinal/anatomia & histologia , Tecido Linfoide/anatomia & histologia , Modelos Animais , Animais , Líquidos Corporais/fisiologia , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/normas , Trato Gastrointestinal/fisiologia , Cobaias , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Tecido Linfoide/fisiologia , Masculino , Coelhos , Especificidade da Espécie , Suínos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA