Effects of a Novel Amino Acid Formula on Nutritional and Metabolic Status, Anemia and Myocardial Function in Thrice-Weekly Hemodialysis Patients: Results of a Six-Month Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.

(1) Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) induces metabolic derangement of amino acid (AA) kinetics, eliciting severe damage to the protein anabolism. This damage is further intensified by a significant loss of AAs through hemodialysis (HD), affecting all tissues with a high metabolic turnover, such as the myocardium and body muscle mass. (2) Aim: to illustrate the effects of a novel AA mixture in boosting mitochondrial energy production. (3) Methods: A strict selection of 164 dialysis patients was carried out, allowing us to finally identify 22 compliant patients who had not used any form of supplements over the previous year. The study design envisaged a 6-month randomized, double-blind trial for the comparison of two groups of hemodialysis patients: eleven patients (67.2 ± 9.5 years) received the novel AA mix (TRG), whilst the other eleven (68.2 ± 10.5 years) were given a placebo mix that was indistinguishable from the treatment mix (PLG). (4) Results: Despite the 6-month observation period, the following were observed: maintenance of target hemoglobin values with a reduced need for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in TRG > 36% compared to PLG (p < 0.02), improved phase angle (PhA) accompanied by an increase in muscle mass solely in the TRG group (p < 0.05), improved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF > 67%) in the TRG versus PLG group (p < 0.05) with early but marked signs of improved diastolic function. Increased sensitivity to insulin with greater control of glycemic levels in TRG versus PLG (p = 0.016). (5) Conclusions: the new AA mix seemed to be effective, showing a positive result on nutritional metabolism and cardiac performance, stable hemoglobin levels with the need for lower doses of erythropoietin (EPO), insulin increased cell sensitivity, better muscle metabolism with less loss of mass.

Differences and Effects of Metabolic Fate of Individual Amino Acid Loss in High-Efficiency Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to quantify the loss and arterial blood concentration of the three main classes of amino acids (AAs)-nonessential amino acids (NEAAs), essential amino acids (EAAs), and branched-chain amino acids-as resulting from high-efficiency hemodialysis (HED) and hemodiafiltration (HDF). We moreover aimed to identify the different fates and metabolic effects manifested in patients undergoing hemodialysis and the consequences on body composition and influence of nutritional decline into protein energy wasting. DESIGN AND METHODS: Identical dialysis monitors, membranes, and dialysate/infusate were used to ensure consistency. Ten patients were recruited and randomized to receive treatment with on-line modern HED and HDF. Arterial plasma concentrations of individual AAs were compared in healthy volunteers and patients undergoing hemodialysis, and AA levels outflowing from the dialyzer were evaluated. Baseline AA plasma levels of patients undergoing hemodialysis were compared with findings obtained 1 year later. RESULTS: A severe loss of AA with HED/HDF was confirmed: a marked loss of total AAs (5 g/session) was detected, corresponding to more than 65% of all AAs. With regard to individual AAs, glutamine displayed a consistent increase (+150%), whereas all other AAs decreased after 12 months of HD/HDF. Only a few AAs, such as proline, cysteine, and histidine maintained normal levels. The most severe metabolic consequences may result from losses of EAAs such as valine, leucine, and histidine and from NEAAs including proline, cysteine, and glutamic acid eliciting the onset of hypercatabolism threatening muscle mass loss. CONCLUSION: Dialysis losses, together with the effect of chronic uremia, resulted in a reduction of fundamental EAAs and NEAAs, which progressively led our patients after 12 months to a deterioration of lean mass toward sarcopenia. Therefore, the reintroduction of a correctly balanced AA supplementation in patients undergoing HD to prevent or halt decline of hypercatabolism into cachexia is recommended.

[Infrequent and incremental dialysis: differences and definitions].

The purpose of this review is to give dignity at the Incremental Dialysis, which cannot be confused with the term and the therapeutic choice defined as Infrequent Dialysis. The Infrequent Dialysis is defined by each and every hemodialytic therapeutic choice like rhythms below thrice-weekly-hemodialytic treatments. Nonetheless, Infrequent Dialysis is a choice of replacement hemodialysis therapy with pays more special clinical attentions and nutritional monitoring and should also be accompanied by a slightly hypoproteic controlled nutrition. When talking about the Incremental Dialysis (CDDP) it is defined as a well-defined therapeutic program that requires a significant clinical attention. The CDDP begins with the pre-dialysis outpatient clinic in the short period of time when the patient passes, after a severe nutrition compliance assessment with a VFG of 5-10 mL / min / 1.73mq, from the conservative treatment to an hypoproteic diet composed of 0.6g/ Kg / day with or without essential amino acids and hyposaline diet supplemented by One-Weekly Dialysis. The Incremental Dialysis program is strictly tailored on the trend of Residual Renal Function (FRR). CDDP is a time variable therapeutic "bridge" that must provide a good metabolic status and a good quality of life of the treated patients. Recent studies have shown a lower mortality compared with thrice-weekly-dialysis and a neutral input/output balance of phosphorus pool due to the phosphaturia contribution compared to the thrice-weekly-patients who lose early their FRR. Further studies are needed to confirm the safety and validity of this therapeutic choice.