Structural variation between neuropeptide isoforms affects function in the lobster cardiac system.

Neuronal responses to peptide signaling are determined by the specific binding of a peptide to its receptor(s). For example, isoforms of the same peptide family can drive distinct responses in the same circuit by having different affinities for the same receptor, by having each isoform bind to a different receptor, or by a combination of these scenarios. Small changes in peptide composition can alter the binding kinetics and overall physiological response to a given peptide. In the American lobster (Homarus americanus), native isoforms of C-type allatostatins (AST-Cs) usually decrease heartbeat frequency and alter contraction force. However, one of the three AST-C isoforms, AST-C II, drives a cardiac response distinct from the response elicited by the other two. To investigate the aspects of the peptide that might be responsible for these differential responses, we altered various features of each peptide sequence. Although the presence of an amide group at the end of a peptide sequence (amidation) is often essential for determining physiological function, we demonstrate that C-terminal amidation does not dictate the AST-C response in the lobster cardiac system. However, single amino acid substitution within the consensus sequence did account for many of the differences in specific response characteristics (e.g. contraction frequency or force).

Does Differential Receptor Distribution Underlie Variable Responses to a Neuropeptide in the Lobster Cardiac System?

Central pattern generators produce rhythmic behaviors independently of sensory input; however, their outputs can be modulated by neuropeptides, thereby allowing for functional flexibility. We investigated the effects of C-type allatostatins (AST-C) on the cardiac ganglion (CG), which is the central pattern generator that controls the heart of the American lobster, Homarus americanus, to identify the biological mechanism underlying the significant variability in individual responses to AST-C. We proposed that the presence of multiple receptors, and thus differential receptor distribution, was at least partly responsible for this observed variability. Using transcriptome mining and PCR-based cloning, we identified four AST-C receptors (ASTCRs) in the CG; we then characterized their cellular localization, binding potential, and functional activation. Only two of the four receptors, ASTCR1 and ASTCR2, were fully functional GPCRs that targeted to the cell surface and were activated by AST-C peptides in our insect cell expression system. All four, however, were amplified from CG cDNAs. Following the confirmation of ASTCR expression, we used physiological and bioinformatic techniques to correlate receptor expression with cardiac responses to AST-C across individuals. Expression of ASTCR1 in the CG showed a negative correlation with increasing contraction amplitude in response to AST-C perfusion through the lobster heart, suggesting that the differential expression of ASTCRs within the CG is partly responsible for the specific physiological response to AST-C exhibited by a given individual lobster.