Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Intern Med ; 160(12): 1781-7, 2000 Jun 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10871971

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit both cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). It is not known whether a specific inhibitor of COX-2 will provide efficacy in osteoarthritis (OA) comparable with NSAIDs. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of the rofecoxib, which specifically inhibits COX-2, with those of the NSAID ibuprofen in patients with OA. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and tolerability of rofecoxib (12.5 and 25 mg once daily) with ibuprofen (800 mg 3 times daily). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind trial of 809 adults with OA was conducted. Patients with OA in whom the knee or hip was the primary source of pain were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups on demonstration of disease activity: placebo; rofecoxib, 12.5 or 25 mg once daily; or ibuprofen, 800 mg 3 times daily. Clinical efficacy and safety were monitored during a 6-week treatment period. RESULTS: Both doses of rofecoxib demonstrated efficacy clinically comparable with ibuprofen as assessed by 3 primary end points (pain walking on a flat surface [Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index], patient global assessment of response to therapy, and investigator global assessment of disease status) according to predefined comparability criteria. Both rofecoxib doses and the ibuprofen dose provided significantly (P<.001) greater efficacy than placebo on all primary end points. Results from secondary end points were consistent with those of the primary end points. All treatments were well tolerated; the overall incidence rates of clinical adverse experiences were not significantly different (P>.05) among the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Rofecoxib was well tolerated and provided clinical efficacy comparable with a high dose of the NSAID ibuprofen.


Assuntos
Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase/uso terapêutico , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Lactonas/uso terapêutico , Osteoartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/efeitos adversos , Lactonas/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sulfonas , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 67(2): 240-5, 1998 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9459371

RESUMO

To determine the effects of vitamin C on cardiovascular risk factors, we studied dietary vitamin C enrichment in 36 healthy male students consuming a diet high in saturated fatty acids. After a 1-mo run-in period during which the subjects consumed approximately 50 mg ascorbic acid/d (low-C diet), half of the subjects were randomly assigned to receive 500 mg ascorbic acid/d for an additional 2 mo (high-C diet). Plasma ascorbic acid increased from 13.5 micromol/L with the low-C diet to 51.7 micromol/L with the high-C diet. Plasma cholesterol increased slightly with the high-C diet, but not above baseline concentrations. This increase was offset by an increase in the lag period of in vitro LDL oxidation, which correlated with plasma ascorbic acid concentrations (r = 0.735, P = 0.0012). Lipoprotein vitamin E concentrations were unchanged with the two diets. There were no effects on concentrations of fibrinogen or factor VII. The fact that ascorbic acid reduced the in vitro susceptibility of lipoproteins to oxidation provides presumptive evidence for an interaction between aqueous and lipophilic antioxidants (vitamins C and E ) in maintaining the integrity of LDL particles.


Assuntos
Ácido Ascórbico/farmacologia , Citrus/metabolismo , Gorduras na Dieta/administração & dosagem , Lipoproteínas/metabolismo , Vitamina E/metabolismo , Adulto , Ácido Ascórbico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Ascórbico/sangue , Índice de Massa Corporal , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Ácidos Graxos/administração & dosagem , Fibrinogênio/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxirredução/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de Risco , Vitamina E/farmacologia
3.
Laryngoscope ; 99(3): 325-9, 1989 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2918803

RESUMO

Central nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus is frequently occult, may be the presenting sign, and is a bad prognostic indicator. At present, there is no reliable, sensitive laboratory test for the evaluation and diagnosis of subclinical central nervous system involvement of the disease. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials with and without increased stimulus rate have been used to diagnose ischemic lesions in the central nervous system. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials, with and without increased stimulus rate, was used to investigate 15 systemic lupus erythematosus patients, 20 normal participants, and 5 patients receiving corticosteroids for bronchial asthma. A significant statistical difference was found in the net effect of increased stimulus rate in comparisons of the systemic lupus erythematosus patients with the normal group. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials, with increased stimulus rate, demonstrated subclinical involvement of the central nervous system in systemic lupus erythematosus, reinforcing the notion that increased stimulus rate measures are sensitive to ischemic changes, in this case, even in neurologically asymptomatic patients.


Assuntos
Tronco Encefálico/fisiopatologia , Potenciais Evocados Auditivos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/fisiopatologia , Estimulação Acústica/métodos , Adulto , Asma/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Tempo de Reação/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA