RESUMO
The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes and adverse events for 300 men with prostate cancer treated with 125iodine (125I) brachytherapy with and without external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) at a single institution in Japan. Between February 2005 and November 2011, 300 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with 125I brachytherapy at the Nagoya University Hospital. A total of 271 men were treated with implants with doses of 145 Gy, and 29 men were treated with implants with doses of 110 Gy combined with EBRT (40-50 Gy/20-25 fractions). The median patient age was 69 years (range, 53-83 years). The median follow-up period was 53 months (range, 5-99 months). According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk classification, 132 men (44%) had low-risk, 147 men (29%) had intermediate-risk and 21 men (7%) had high-risk disease. The 5-year overall survival rate, biochemical relapse-free survival rate, and disease-specific survival rates were 93.5%, 97.3% and 98.5%, respectively. Two men (0.6%) died of prostate cancer and 10 men (3.3%) died of other causes. Seventeen men (5.6%) experienced Grade 2 rectal bleeding in all: 12 (41.4%) of 29 in brachytherapy with EBRT, and 5 (1.8%) of 271 in brachytherapy alone. The rates of Grade 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicity were 1.0% and 1.7%, respectively. Excellent local control was achieved at our hospital for localized prostate cancer with 125I brachytherapy with and without EBRT. Gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were acceptable.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia , Radioisótopos do Iodo/química , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze data in patients with stage IB-IIB uterine cervical cancer who were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with high dose cisplatin and fluorouracil as postoperative adjuvant therapy. Between February 2003 and November 2011, 76 patients with FIGO stage IB-IIB cervical cancer were analyzed. Seventy patients were treated with postoperative CCRT and 6 patients were treated with radiation therapy alone. Data related to overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), toxicity, and failure pattern were analyzed. The median patient age was 45 years (range, 20-80 years). The median follow-up duration was 63 months (range, 10-125 months). Fifty-eight patients (76.3%) had a squamous cell histologic type, 55 patients (72.4%) had lymphovascular invasion, 31 patients (40.8%) had parametrial invasion, and 28 patients (36.8%) had lymph node metastases. Five-year OS and DFS were 96% and 92%, respectively. Five-year DFS in stage IB1 patients was significantly higher than in stage IB2-IIB patients (p = 0.022). Nineteen patients (25%) had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 13 patients (17.1%) had grade 3 anemia, and 2 patients (2.6%) had grade 3 thrombocytopenia, but none of these patients died from the disease. Three patients experienced chronic toxicity: one had bladder perforation, one had hydronephrosis, and one experienced ileus. CCRT as postoperative adjuvant therapy resulted in good survival and outcome without severe toxicity.
Assuntos
Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/radioterapia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
We aimed to evaluate the radioprotective effect of hydrolyzed rice bran (HRB) on acute gastroenteritis due to chemoradiotherapy for treatment of cervical cancer. This placebo-controlled, double-blind study was conducted as an exploratory investigation of the colitis-inhibiting effects of HRB in alleviating acute-phase gastrointestinal side effects of chemoradiotherapy. The study involved 20 patients (10 in the HRB group, 10 in the control group). The patients in the control group underwent the same chemoradiotherapy regimen as those in the HRB group, but they received a placebo instead of HRB. The diarrheal side effect assessment score was lower in the HRB than control group, and a trend toward a reduction in diarrhea symptoms was observed with the oral intake of HRB. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the administration of intestinal regulators and antidiarrheal agents, but again the assessment score was lower in the HRB than control group, and diarrhea symptoms were alleviated with the oral intake of HRB. A trend toward no need for strong antidiarrheal agents was seen. Although this study was an exploratory clinical trial, the results suggest that HRB may relieve diarrhea, an acute-phase gastrointestinal side effect of chemoradiotherapy.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the treatment outcome of patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with re-irradiation and chemotherapy. METHODS: Between 1991 and 2004, 36 patients with locally recurrent NPC received re-irradiation and chemotherapy. The median re-irradiation dose was 37.9 Gy; the median total dose of prior irradiation and re-irradiation was 104.4 Gy. The outcome is studied retrospectively and also evaluated the prognostic factors and toxicities. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 40 months, 3-year overall survival (OS) was 58.3% and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 25.0%. Patients aged <50 and of early stage at recurrence had a significantly better OS and PFS. Over Grade 3 of late toxicities were seen in patients received a total dose of >110 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Age and stage at recurrence were identified as prognostic factors for OS and PFS. Patients received external beam radiation therapy at a total dose of more than 110 Gy should be careful for severe late toxicities, and it is thought to be the optimal dose for recurrent tumor.