RESUMO
PURPOSE: Artificial hydration and nutrition therapy (AHNT) initiated by patients/families sometimes differs from medically appropriate treatment plans. We aimed to identify the causes of these differences and examine the ensuing responses and outcomes. METHODS: Of 133 adult cancer patients receiving end-of-life care in the last 2 years, these discrepancies occurred in 41 patients. We retrospectively examined the following issues: (1) The reason why these discrepancies occurred. (2) Based on the causes identified in (1), the following actions were taken: 1) If the consent to change to medically appropriate AHNT was obtained, physical findings using Japan Palliative Oncology Study (JPOS) group and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were compared before and 1 week after the intervention. 2) If consent was not obtained, time-limited trial (TLT) was conducted, and these results were compared. (3) The communication between patients/families and medical professionals was compared using Support Team Assessment Schedule. RESULTS: (1) Causes: a) the lack of understanding of the disease condition in 26 cases and b) faulty expectation of AHNT in 15 cases. (2) In 30 cases of 1) (20 of a) and 10 of b)) and 11 of 2) in which TLT was performed, JPOS and ESAS improved significantly. (3) The communication above was improved significantly in 1) and 2) (P = .0027 and .0039, respectively). CONCLUSION: Providing medically appropriate AHNT with the consent of patients/families is expected to not only alleviate distressing symptoms but also improve the communication between patients/families and medical professionals, as well as improve the quality of palliative care.