Impact of preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy on degree of malignant esophageal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Malignant esophageal stenosis is a common and severe complication of advanced esophageal cancer that can be a serious problem in the continuation of chemotherapy and other anticancer treatments. The impact of chemotherapy regimens on the degree of improvement in esophageal stenosis is unknown. In this study, we focused on the impacts of chemotherapy on the direct anticancer effects, and in the improvement of malignant stenosis. METHODS: Patients who underwent radical esophagectomy after chemotherapy, either adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) or docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen, were included. We assessed the length of the cancerous stenosis, the width of the narrowest segment, and the size of the intraluminal area in the stenotic segment by fluoroscopy, and compared the differences before and after chemotherapy. In addition, we evaluated the dysphagia score (Mellow-Pinkas scoring system) as the evaluation of patients' symptoms. The antitumor effects of chemotherapy were also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were enrolled: 50 were treated with FP, and 31 were treated with DCF. The expansion rate in the length of the narrowest part was significantly increased in the DCF group compared with the FP group. Furthermore, the stenosis index (intraluminal stenotic area/stenotic length) was significantly increased in the DCF group compared with the FP group (112% vs 96%, P = 0.038). Dysphagia score after chemotherapy significantly improved in the DCF group compared to the FP group (P = 0.007). The response rates were 60% in the FP group and 67.7% in the DCF group. Effective histopathological response (improvement to grade 2 or 3) was 24% in the FP group and 38.8% in the DCF group. CONCLUSION: DCF therapy is more effective than FP treatment in the improvement of malignant esophageal stenosis.

Study protocol for daiobotanpito combined with antibiotic therapy for treatment of acute diverticulitis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Colonic diverticular disease has been increasing in prevalence due to the rapidly aging global population, but standard treatment has not changed dramatically in recent years. Daiobotanpito (DBT; Da Huang Mu Dan Tang in Chinese) has been used in medical treatment of acute abdominal abscesses, such as appendicitis or diverticulitis in traditional Japanese (Kampo) medicine for many years, based on more than 3000 years of experience. Prior to this study, a retrospective open-label trial was conducted to compare patients with acute diverticulitis who received oral DBT combined with intravenous antibiotics with those who received intravenous antibiotic alone; it showed a positive effect of DBT on acute diverticulitis. We aim to investigate whether moderate to severe acute diverticulitis shows greater improvement with intravenous antibiotics plus orally administered DBT compared with intravenous antibiotics plus placebo. METHODS: This is a two-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial, which is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DBT in patients with moderate to severe diverticulitis treated with intravenous antibiotics. Eligible participants will be randomized to either a treatment group receiving a 10-day oral DBT regimen plus conventional therapy or a control group receiving a 10-day placebo regimen plus conventional therapy. The primary outcome will be success in treating diverticulitis: the success rate will be defined as elimination of abdominal pain within 4 days in all patients, and in patients with fever (body temperature ≧ 37.5 °C) on inclusion into this study, fever relief with reduction in body temperature to < 37.5 °C within 3 days. Secondary endpoints will include the number of hospitalization days, changes in inflammatory response (C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts), fever type, number of days before beginning food intake, recurrence rate (observation for 1 year after registration), and adverse event expression rate. Assessments will be performed at baseline and on the day of discharge. The recurrence rate will be recorded at 1 year after registration. DISCUSSION: This study is expected to provide evidence to support the clinical benefits of DBT in the treatment of acute diverticulitis. It may also provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of DBT in the recurrence of acute diverticulitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR: UMIN000027381. Registered on 27 April 2017. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000031377, and changed to jRCTs041180063, registered on 30 July 2019; as a result of the revision of the domestic law in 2018 in Japan.

Preventive effect of oral hangeshashinto (TJ-14) on the development of reflux-induced esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin E2 is one of the potential products that promotes development of tumors and also is a strong inducer of M2 phenotype macrophages, which contribute to tumor development in the immunosuppressed microenvironment. Hangeshashinto (TJ-14), a Japanese traditional medicine (Kampo medicine), has been reported to be effective in preventing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis through the reduction of prostaglandin E2. We previously developed a surgical rat reflux model of esophageal cancer and used this well-established animal model to investigate the action of TJ-14 in preventing esophageal cancer. We also assessed the effect of TJ-14 on the downregulation of prostaglandin E2 production, utilizing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line exposed to bile acid. METHODS: An end-to-side esophagojejunostomy was performed for the reflux model. A daily oral diet was subsequently administered, consisting of either diet-incorporated TJ-14 or standard diet as a control group. The rats were killed at 40 weeks after surgery. The incidence of esophageal cancer, Barrett's metaplasia, and proliferative hyperplasia were assessed histologically. CD163, a M2 phenotype macrophage marker, was assessed with immunohistochemistry. Prostaglandin E2 enzyme immunoassay and lactate dehydrogenase assay were performed on chenodeoxycholic acid or gastroesophageal reflux contents exposed to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of the controls (n = 12) developed esophageal cancer, but animals that received TJ-14 (n = 10) had a cancer incidence of 10% (P=.007). Barrett's metaplasia was found in 83% of the rats in the control group and 50% of the rats in the TJ-14 indicating a protective tendency of TJ-14 (P=.095). All of the rats developed proliferative hyperplasia. The number of M2 phenotype macrophage were significantly decreased in the TJ-14 group compared to the control group in both Barrett's metaplasia and esophageal cancer lesions. TJ-14 inhibited chenodeoxycholic acid or gastroesophageal reflux content-induced prostaglandin E2 production in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell. CONCLUSION: TJ-14 reduced the incidence of reflux-induced esophageal cancer and the infiltration of M2 macrophages in a surgical rat model or suppressed prostaglandin E2 production in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell. Further investigation is required regarding the potential clinical use of TJ-14 as an esophageal cancer chemopreventive agent.

[A Case of Spontaneous Esophageal Rupture That Required Operation during Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Transverse Colon Cancer].

A 75-year-old male underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur uracil(UFT)plus Leucovorin(LV)after surgery for transverse colon cancer(pT3pN0M0, ly1, v2, pStageⅡ). Although he had diarrhea(Grade 3)and vomiting(Grade 2)from day 15, he continued to take the medicine at his own discretion. He visited a hospital because of acute renal failure from severe dehydration. He went into shock after evacuation, and the computed tomography(CT)finding suggested a diagnosis of spontaneous esophageal rupture at the lower esophagus. We made a diagnosis of intrathoracic perforation of the esophagus by using thoracic drainage. Then, we performed an operation for mediastinal drainage via a transabdominal approach and the lesser omentum. He started ingestion from POD36 and transferred to another hospital on POD85. He had no disease recurrence in our outpatient care. We think that the spontaneous esophageal rupture occurred because of the frequent vomiting caused by the continued chemotherapy despite the severe side effects. Treatments must be selected by considering patients' life background and medical compliance, and common guidance in taking medications must be provided to elderly patients at the start of chemotherapy.

Colonic stenosis caused by infection of an intraperitoneal access port system: a rare complication of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy is garnering attention as an effective treatment for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. We report the case of a patient who developed colonic stenosis caused by infection of an i.p. access port system during i.p. chemotherapy. It was difficult to differentiate whether the extrinsic colonic stenosis arose from a catheter infection or peritoneal metastasis of the gastric cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old Japanese man underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Because the intraoperative findings revealed peritoneal metastasis, a port system was implanted for subsequent i.p. chemotherapy. Two months after initiation of chemotherapy, he complained of vomiting and abdominal pain. A computed tomography scan revealed marked thickening of the sigmoid colon wall adjacent to the catheter of the i.p. access port system. A barium enema demonstrated extrinsic irregular stenosis of the sigmoid colon. Although it was difficult to distinguish whether infection or peritoneal metastasis had caused the colonic stenosis, we removed the port system to obtain a therapeutic diagnosis. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were detected by catheter culture. The wall thickening and stenosis of the sigmoid colon completely resolved after removal of the port system. CONCLUSIONS: We report the case of a rare complication in association with an i.p. access port system. Infection of the port system should be considered as a differential diagnosis when colonic stenosis adjacent to the catheter is observed during i.p. chemotherapy.