Controlling Nutritional Status Score Serves as a Prognosticator in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Optimal Timing of Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Usefulness of various nutritional indices for management of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been reported. Although Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is among promising indices to predict outcome, the optimal timing for its measurement during the perioperative period remains unknown. Here the prognostic value of the CONUT score was assessed among patients with ESCC. METHODS: We analyzed 464 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy of ESCC, of which 276 patients were treated with neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). The significance of the associations between candidate parameters including the CONUT score and postoperative prognosis were evaluated. RESULT: Among the 25 candidate predictors, the preoperative CONUT score had the highest correlation with overall survival (OS) after surgery. Patients were categorized as follows: normal, mild, and moderate or severe, on the basis of the preoperative CONUT score. OS was significantly shortened as the CONUT score worsened. Multivariable analysis revealed that the CONUT scores of the subgroups mild (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.69) and moderate or severe (HR 2.18) were independent predictors of poor prognosis for OS. Furthermore, in an analysis limited to patients who underwent NAT, OS was significantly shortened as the preoperative CONUT score worsened. On the contrary, there was no significant difference in RFS among patient groups stratified by the CONUT score determined before NAT. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the preoperative CONUT score serves as a prognosticator in resectable ESCC. The preoperative CONUT value was more useful than that before NAT in patients administered NAT.

Randomized phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of SOX versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (KSCC1301).

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the current standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), is associated with many radiotherapy (RT)-related side effects. We aimed to evaluate whether S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) or folinic acid, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) can be as effective as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens for LARC without RT. METHODS: Patients with untreated resectable LARC were randomly assigned to receive SOX or mFOLFOX6. The NAC protocol period was 3 months. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints included pathological effects, surgical completion rate, 3-year survival, and safety. RESULTS: From September 2013 to October 2015, 56 and 54 patients were enrolled in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates were 69.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54.9-83.6) and 73.4% (95% CI 58.7-83.6) in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively; no significant differences were found between the arms (log-rank test; P = 0.5315, hazard ratio: 0.808, 95% CI 0.414-1.578). The 3-year survival rates were 92.3 and 91.8% in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively. The surgical completion rate was 98.1% overall, 100% in the SOX arm, and 96.0% in the mFOLFOX6 arm. The incidences of pathological response rates ≥grade 1b were 41.5 and 43.8% in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively. Both treatments were manageable and tolerable. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of SOX and mFOLFOX6, both of which may be new neoadjuvant treatment candidates in previously untreated LARC cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 3rd Oct 2013; This study was registered in the UMIN clinical trials registry on 14th Aug, 2013. (Prospectively registered, UMIN-CTR number UMIN000011486). https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=brows&recptno=R000013441&language=J.

A prospective trial to evaluate treatment effects of a ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate containing nutrient for leakage at the anastomotic site after esophagectomy.

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is associated with prolonged hospitalization and increased medical cost. Additionally, it sometimes leads to a fatal condition and impaired postoperative quality of life. During the process of wound healing, ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate (HMB) is important for collagen biosynthesis. An open-label prospective intervention trial has been designed to evaluate the treatment effect of an enteral nutrient containing HMB with arginine and glutamine (Abound, Abbott Japan Co., Ltd.) for leakage at the anastomotic site after esophagectomy. Patients in whom leakage at the anastomotic site developed within 14 days after esophagectomy are eligible and Abound (24 g) is administered for 14 days through an enteral feeding tube. The target sample size is 10. The primary endpoint is duration between diagnosis and cure of leakage. Surgical procedure, safety, length of fasting, drainage placement and hospital stay, and nutritional status are determined as secondary endpoints. A historical control consisting of 20 patients who had leakage at the anastomotic site after esophagectomy between 2005 and 2018 at Nagoya University Hospital is compared with enrolled patients.

Biological and conditional factors should be included when defining criteria for resectability for patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate novel resectability criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) proposed by the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) by comparing them with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. METHODS: 369 patients who underwent upfront surgery for PDAC were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) of each group as defined by either of the guidelines were compared and preoperative prognostic factors for OS were identified. RESULTS: Based on the IAP-criteria, 157 patients were classified as resectable (R), 192 as borderline resectable (BR) and 20 as unresectable (UR), with the median survival time (MST) of 40 months, 17 and 11, respectively. In contrast to the NCCN-criteria, BR demonstrated significantly better OS than UR (P = 0.023) under the IAP-criteria. Performance status ≥2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.47, P = 0.014) and lymph node metastasis suspected by imaging (HR: 1.55, P = 0.003) were identified as independent prognostic factors by the multivariate analysis along with portal or arterial invasion, while carbohydrate antigen 19-9 ≥ 500 U/ml was not (HR: 1.23, P = 0.190). CONCLUSION: The IAP-criteria, which includes biological and conditional factors, resulted in superior separation of survival curves stratified by the resectablity when compared with the NCCN-criteria.

Clinical Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Nutritional Status in Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The association between neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and nutritional status in pancreatic cancer (PC) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of NAT on nutritional status. METHODS: Overall, 161 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for PC between August 2010 and March 2017 were enrolled and were divided into two groups: the neoadjuvant group (NAG; n = 67) and the control group (CG; n = 94). Based on relative dose intensity (RDI), patients in the NAG group were further divided into RDI ≥ 80% (n = 39) and RDI < 80% (n = 19). Changes in nutritional index, inflammatory index, and inflammation-based prognostic scores during NAT and the perioperative period were assessed. RESULTS: Retinol-binding protein, prealbumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and prognostic nutrition index significantly worsened in the NAG after NAT (p = 0.007, p = 0.03, p = 0.04, p = 0.007, and p = 0.004, respectively). The recovery of rapid turnover proteins after postoperative day 5 was significantly worse in the NAG compared with the CG (p < 0.05), but tended to be more prompt in the RDI ≥ 80% group among the NAG. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and time to postoperative adjuvant therapy between the NAG and the CG. CONCLUSIONS: NAT for PC could aggravate nutritional status and hamper its postoperative recovery. Furthermore, malnutrition might decrease tolerance of NAT. These findings suggest the importance of nutritional support for patients with NAT in PC.

Evaluation and proposal of novel resectability criteria for pancreatic cancer established by the Japan Pancreas Society.

BACKGROUND: The guidelines for the classification of the resectability of pancreatic cancer established by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network can be difficult to utilize in clinical practice. We evaluated novel criteria proposed by the Japan Pancreas Society. METHODS: We analyzed 382 patients with pancreatic cancer between 2001 and 2015 for survival differences among subgroups classified according to the Japan Pancreas Society classification. Overall survival and disease-free survival were expressed as median values and compared with data based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network classification, and differences in initial patterns of recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall survival times according to the Japan Pancreas Society criteria were 34.2, 29.7, 17.3, 14.3, and 15.8 months for the groups defined as resectable, resectable with portal vein invasion, borderline resectable with portal vein invasion, borderline resectable with arterial invasion, and unresectable by locally advanced disease respectively. The overall survival of the resectable group was better than those of the borderline resectable with portal vein invasion or borderline resectable with arterial invasion groups (P < .0001); however, the borderline resectable with portal vein invasion, borderline resectable with arterial invasion, and unresectable by locally advanced groups showed no differences in overall survival. The resectable group showed a tendency toward better survival than the resectable with portal vein invasion group (P = .058). The median overall survival times according to the classic 2012 National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria were 30.5, 20.5, 15.8, and 13.8 months for the resectable, portal invasion, common hepatic artery and superior mesenteric artery invasion groups, respectively. Each survival curve was clearly separate. The borderline resectable with arterial invasion and unresectable by locally advanced groups exhibited high local recurrence rates (42.0% and 44.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Japan Pancreas Society criteria, which are simpler, predicted survival differences between the resectable group and the other subgroups. Our data suggest that cancer patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (borderline resectable with portal vein invasion and borderline resectable with arterial invasion) can be managed as a single subset.

Neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine and bevacizumab without radiotherapy for poor-risk rectal cancer: N-SOG 03 Phase II trial.

OBJECTIVE: This Phase II trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine and bevacizumab without radiotherapy in patients with poor-risk rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients with magnetic resonance imaging-defined poor-risk rectal cancer received neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine and bevacizumab followed by total mesorectal excision or more extensive surgery. RESULTS: Between February 2010 and December 2011, 32 patients were enrolled in this study. The completion rate of the scheduled chemotherapy was 91%. Reasons for withdrawal were refusal to continue therapy in two patients and disease progression in one, with two of these three patients not undergoing surgery. Among the 29 patients who completed the scheduled chemotherapy, one refused surgery within 8 weeks after the completion of chemotherapy, which was the period stipulated by the protocol, and another had rectal perforation, requiring urgent laparotomy. As a result, the completion rate of this experimental treatment was 84%. Of the 30 patients who underwent surgery, the R0 resection rate was 90% and a postoperative complication occurred in 43%. A pathological complete response was observed in 13% and good tumor regression was exhibited in 37%. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine plus bevacizumab for poor-risk rectal cancer caused a high rate of anastomotic leakage and experienced a case with perforation during chemotherapy, both of which were bevacizumab-related toxicity. Although the short-term results with the completion rate of 84.4% and the pathological complete response rate of 13.3% were satisfactory, we have to reconsider the necessity of bevacizumab in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (UMIN number, 000003507).