Racial differences in familiarity, interest, and use of integrative medicine among patients with breast cancer.

Purpose Integrative medicine (IM) has received ASCO endorsement for managing cancer treatment-related side effects. Little is known about racial differences in familiarity, interest, and use of IM among breast cancer patients. Methods Breast cancer patients enrolled in the Chicago Multiethnic Epidemiologic Breast Cancer Cohort were surveyed regarding familiarity, interest, and use of IM: acupuncture, massage, meditation, music therapy, and yoga. Familiarity and interest, measured by a 5-point Likert scale, was modeled using proportional odds. Use was self-reported, modeled using binary logistic regression. Results Of 1,300 respondents (71.4% White and 21.9% Black), Black patients were less likely than White patients to be familiar with acupuncture (aOR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.87). While there was no differences in interest in acupuncture between Black and White patients (aOR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.76-1.65), Black patients were more interested in massage (aOR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.25-2.77), meditation (aOR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.37-3.00), music therapy (aOR 2.68, 95% CI: 1.80-3.99) and yoga (aOR 2.10, 95% CI: 1.41-3.12). Black patients were less likely than White to have used acupuncture (aOR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.84); but there were no racial differences in use of massage (aOR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.53-1.30), meditation (aOR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.47-1.43), music therapy (aOR 1.65, 95% CI: 0.82-3.32) and yoga (aOR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.37-1.20). Conclusion Black patients expressed more interest in IM than their White counterparts; there were no racial differences in IM use, except lower acupuncture use among Black patients. A breast program focused on equity should provide access to these services for breast cancer patients.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated With Familiarity, Interest, and Use of Integrative Therapies Among Patients With Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Integrative therapies reduce side effects from cancer treatment, though remain underutilized. There is a paucity of data on factors associated with familiarity, interest, and use of these therapies among breast cancer patients. METHODS: A survey on familiarity, interest, and use of acupuncture, massage, meditation, music therapy, and yoga was conducted in patients enrolled in the Chicago Multiethnic Epidemiologic Breast Cancer Cohort. Familiarity and interest were assessed using a five-point Likert scale, and modeled using proportional odds regression. Use was per self-report, modeled using logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Of 1300 study participants, 59.6% were familiar with massage, 47.2% acupuncture, 46.9% meditation, 46.5% yoga, and 34.5% music therapy; 63.3% were interested in massage, 50.2% yoga, 47.9% meditation, 44.2% acupuncture, and 41.4% music therapy. Only 41.3% had used massage, 25.8% acupuncture, 18.7% yoga, 18.5% meditation, and 7.4% music therapy. Older age and lower education level were associated with lower familiarity and interest. Black patients were more likely than White patients to be interested. Patients' interest increased significantly when certain symptoms were treated. In the adjusted models, patients ages 40 to 65 were less likely than those ages <40 to have used massage (aOR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.31-0.98), yoga (aOR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.27-0.99), or meditation (aOR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-0.90). Patients with high school education were less likely than those with a graduate degree to have used acupuncture (aOR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24-0.72), massage (aOR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.25-0.62), or meditation (aOR 0.26, 95% CI: 0.12-0.58). Having received chemotherapy was associated with increased interest in yoga (aOR 1.36, 95% CI: 1.07-1.73), massage (aOR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.01-1.59), or meditation (aOR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01-1.57). Receipt of hormone therapy was not associated with interest or use. CONCLUSION: In this racially diverse cohort of patients, familiarity and interest of integrative therapies were high, while use was low. Older age and lower education level were associated with lack of interest and use. Chemotherapy was associated with interest, but hormone therapy was not. Strategies to promote the benefits and use of integrative therapies among breast cancer patients are needed.

Racial disparities in survival outcomes among breast cancer patients by molecular subtypes.

PURPOSE: Differences in tumor biology, genomic architecture, and health care delivery patterns contribute to the breast cancer mortality gap between White and Black patients in the US. Although this gap has been well documented in previous literature, it remains uncertain how large the actual effect size of race is for different survival outcomes and the four breast cancer subtypes. METHODS: We established a breast cancer patient cohort at the University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center. We chose five major survival outcomes to study: overall survival, recurrence-free survival, breast-cancer-specific survival, time-to-recurrence and post-recurrence survival. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios between Black and White patients, adjusting for selected patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, and also stratified by the four breast cancer subtypes. RESULTS: The study included 2795 stage I-III breast cancer patients (54% White and 38% Black). After adjusting for selected patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, Black patients still did worse than White patients in all five survival outcomes. The racial difference was highest within the HR-/HER2+ subgroup, in both overall survival (hazard ratio = 4.00, 95% CI 1.47-10.86) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio = 3.00, 95% CI 1.36-6.60), adjusting for age at diagnosis, cancer stage, and comorbidities. There was also a significant racial disparity within the HR+/HER2- group in both overall survival and recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that racial disparity existed between White and Black breast cancer patients in terms of both survival and recurrence, and found that this disparity was largest among HR-/HER2+ and HR+/HER2- patients.

Surgical patterns of care in patients with invasive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and breast magnetic resonance imaging: results of a secondary analysis of TBCRC 017.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) downstages advanced primary tumors, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being the most sensitive imaging predictor of response. However, the impact of MRI evaluation on surgical treatment decisions in the neoadjuvant setting has not been well described. We report surgical patterns of care across 8 National Cancer Institute comprehensive cancer centers in women receiving both NCT and MRI to evaluate the impact of MRI findings on surgical planning. METHODS: Seven hundred seventy women from 8 institutions received NCT with MRI obtained both before and after systemic treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses of imaging, patient-, and tumor-related covariates associated with choice of breast surgery were conducted. RESULTS: MRI and surgical data were available on 759 of 770 patients. A total of 345 of 759 (45 %) patients received breast-conserving surgery and 414 of 759 (55 %) received mastectomy. Mastectomy occurred more commonly in patients with incomplete MRI response versus complete (58 vs. 43 %) (p = 0.0003). On multivariate analysis, positive estrogen receptor status (p = 0.02), incomplete MRI response (p = 0.0003), higher baseline T classification (p < 0.0001), younger age (p < 0.0006), and institution (p = 0.003) were independent predictors of mastectomy. A statistically significant trend toward increasing use of mastectomy with increasing T stage at presentation (p < 0.0001) was observed in patients with incomplete response by MRI only. Among women with complete response on MRI, 43 % underwent mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Within a multi-institutional cohort of women undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer, MRI findings were not clearly associated with extent of surgery. This study shows that receptor status, T stage at diagnosis, young age, and treating institution are more significant determinants of surgical treatment choice than MRI response data.