An Oral Polyphenol Formulation to Modulate the Ocular Surface Inflammatory Process and to Improve the Symptomatology Associated with Dry Eye Disease.

Due to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and anti-angiogenic effects, polyphenols are first-rate candidates to prevent or treat chronic diseases in which oxidative stress-induced inflammation plays a role in disease pathogenesis. Dry eye disease (DED) is a common pathology, on which novel phenolic compound formulations have been tested as an adjuvant therapeutic approach. However, polyphenols are characterized by limited stability and solubility, insolubility in water, very rapid metabolism, and a very short half-life. Thus, they show poor bioavailability. To overcome these limitations and improve their stability and bioavailability, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of an oral formulation containing among other compounds, polyphenols and omega-3 fatty acids, with the addition of a surfactant in patients with DED. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four study groups including the study formulation (A), placebo (P), the study formulation + eye lubricant (A + L), and placebo + eye lubricant (P + L). Patients from the A and P groups were instructed to take two capsules every 24 h, while patients in the L groups also added one drop of lubricant twice a day for 12 weeks as well. Regarding safety, non-ocular abnormalities were observed during study formulation therapy. Liver function tests did not show any statistically significant difference (baseline vs. week 4). Concerning efficacy, there was a statistically significant difference between baseline, month 1, and month 3 in the OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) test results in both treatment groups (group A and group A + L). Furthermore, both groups showed statistically significant differences between baseline and month 3 regarding the non-invasive film tear breakup time (NIF-BUT) score and a positive trend related to Shirmer's test at month 3. The non-invasive average breakup time (NIAvg-BUT) score showed a statistically significant difference at month 3 when compared with baseline in the A + L group. The P + L group showed a statistically significant difference in terms of the OSDI questionary between baseline and month 3. Regarding the lissamine green staining, the A + L group showed a statistical difference between baseline and month 3 (p = 0.0367). The placebo + lubricant group did not show statistically significant differences. Finally, the placebo group did not show any data with statistically significant differences. Consequently, this polyphenol formulation as a primary treatment outperformed the placebo alone, and the polyphenol oral formulation used as an adjuvant to artificial tears was superior to the combination of the placebo and the artificial tears. Thus, our data strongly suggest that this polyphenol oral formulation improves visual strain symptoms and tear film status in patients with mild to moderate DED.

Feasibility and safety of vitrectomy under topical anesthesia in an office-based setting.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of office-based vitreoretinal procedures. Methods: Patients undergoing primary elective pars plana vitrectomy were elected for surgery in an office-based setting (performed in a minor procedure room under topical anesthesia [TA] and oral anxiolysis). Rates of surgical objective achievement, surgical timing, and comfort were recorded to evaluate feasibility. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events were assessed to evaluate safety. Results: Office-based vitrectomy surgery was performed in 34 eyes of 30 patients. The mean surgical time was 12.351 ± 8.21 min. Surgical objectives were achieved in 100% of cases. The mean best-corrected visual acuity improvement was 9.08 letters (P < 0.0001). During most parts of the procedure, no patient reported pain or discomfort. Neither intraoperative nor postoperative adverse events were reported until the final follow-up visit. Conclusion: Office-based vitreoretinal procedures under TA could be as feasible and as safe as vitreoretinal procedures under conventional anesthesia.

Pirfenidone restricts Th2 differentiation in vitro and limits Th2 response in experimental liver fibrosis.

Polarized T helper type 2 (Th2) response is linked with fibrosis. Here, we evaluated the effect of the anti-fibrotic agent pirfenidone on Th type 1 (Th1) and Th2 responses. For in vivo testing; Wistar rats were made cirrhotic by intraperitoneal administration of thioacetamide. Once hepatic damage was established, pirfenidone was administered intragastrically on a daily basis during three weeks. Gene expression of Th marks was evaluated by RT-PCR and Western blot assays from liver homogenates. Pirfenidone therapy induced down-regulation of Th2 transcripts and proteins (GATA3 and IL-4), without affecting significantly Th1 genes expression (T-bet and IFN-γ). We found that the activated form of p38 MAPK (identified by Western blot) was reduced by pirfenidone treatment, which is consistent with the anti-Th2 activity observed. Pirfenidone reduced GATA3 nuclear localization without modifying its DNA binding activity (evaluated by electrophoretic mobility shift assay). For in vitro testing; human naive CD4+ T cells were cultured in either Th1 or Th2 polarizing conditions in the presence of pirfenidone and flow cytometric analysis of intracellular synthesis of IFN-γ and IL-4 was conducted. Pirfenidone impaired development of Th2 subpopulation. In conclusion, pirfenidone is capable of impairing Th2 differentiation and limits Th2 profibrogenic response. The mechanism involves p38 inhibition and regulation of GATA3 expression and translocation.