Subcutaneous immunotherapy suppresses Th2 inflammation and induces neutralizing antibodies, but sublingual immunotherapy suppresses airway hyperresponsiveness in grass pollen mouse models for allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Both subcutaneous and sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SCIT and SLIT) have been shown to effectively suppress allergic manifestations upon allergen exposure, providing long-term relief from symptoms in allergic disorders including allergic asthma. Clinical studies directly comparing SCIT and SLIT report a different kinetics and magnitude of immunological changes induced during treatment. Comparative studies into the mechanisms underlying immune suppression in SCIT and SLIT are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to establish an experimental model for grass pollen (GP) SCIT and SLIT that would allow a head-to-head comparison of the two treatments. METHODS: BALB/c mice were sensitized with GP extract, followed by SCIT and SLIT treatments with various GP dosages. Subsequently, we challenged mice with GP and measured airway responsiveness (AHR), GP-specific immunoglobulins, ear swelling tests (EST), eosinophilic inflammation in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and T cell cytokine release after restimulation of lung cells (IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13). RESULTS: We find that SLIT treatment was able to suppress allergen-induced AHR, while allergic inflammation was not effectively suppressed even at the highest GP dose in this model. In contrast, SCIT treatment induced higher levels of GP-specific IgG1, while SLIT was superior in inducing a GP-specific IgG2a response, which was associated with increased Th1 activity in lung tissue after SLIT, but not SCIT treatment. Interestingly, SCIT was able to suppress Th2-type cytokine production in lung cell suspensions, while SLIT failed to do so. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In conclusion, GP-SCIT suppresses Th2 inflammation and induced neutralizing antibodies, while GP-SLIT suppresses the clinically relevant lung function parameters in an asthma mouse model, indicating that the two application routes depend on partially divergent mechanisms of tolerance induction. Interestingly, these data mirror observations in clinical studies, underscoring the translational value of these mouse models.

Iron administration reduces airway hyperreactivity and eosinophilia in a mouse model of allergic asthma.

The prevalence of allergic diseases has increased dramatically during the last four decades and is paralleled by a striking increase in iron intake by infants in affluent societies. Several studies have suggested a link between increased iron intake and the marked increase in prevalence of allergic diseases. We hypothesized that the increased iron intake by infants offers an explanation for the increased prevalence of allergic disease in industrialized societies during the past four decades. A well-established mouse model of ovalbumin (OVA)-driven allergic asthma was used to test the effects of differences in iron intake and systemic iron levels on the manifestations of allergic asthma. Surprisingly, iron supplementation resulted in a significant decrease in airway eosinophilia, while systemic iron injections lead to a significant suppression of both allergen-induced airway eosinophilia and hyperreactivity compared to placebo. In contrast, mice fed on an iron-deprived diet did not show any difference in developing experimentally induced allergic asthma when compared to those fed on an iron-sufficient control diet. In contrast to our hypothesis, airway manifestations of allergic asthma are suppressed by both increased levels of iron intake and systemic iron administrations in the mouse model.

Flow cytometric analysis of cytokine expression in short-term allergen-stimulated T cells mirrors the phenotype of proliferating T cells in long-term cultures.

BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific T(H) cells play an important role in IgE-mediated disorders as allergies. Since this T(H) cell-population only accounts for a small percentage of T(H) cells, they are difficult to phenotype without prior selection or expansion. METHODS: Grass-pollen-specific T(H) cell profiles were evaluated in 5 allergic and 4 non-allergic individuals using three different approaches: CD154 expression on ex vivo grass-pollen-activated PBMCs (i); CFSE-dilution in grass-pollen-restimulated PBMCs (ii) and T cell lines enriched for allergen-specific T cells (iii). RESULTS: Relatively low numbers of allergen-specific T(H) cells were detected using CD154 expression, limiting the power to detect phenotypic differences between allergic and non-allergic individuals. In contrast, higher frequencies of proliferating T(H) cells were detected by loss-of-CFSE intensity in PBMCs and TCLs after grass-pollen-stimulation, resulting in the detection of significantly more IL-4 producing T(H) cells in allergic vs non-allergic individuals. In addition, higher numbers of IFNγ producing T(H) cells were detected in long-term cultures compared to the CD154 expressing T(H) cells. CONCLUSION: To detect allergen-specific T(H) cells for a common allergen as grass-pollen, expansion is not absolutely necessary, although within 8-day grass-pollen cultures, higher numbers of proliferating T(H) cells resulted in increased statistical power to detect phenotypic differences. However, this approach also detects more bystander activated T(H) cells. TCLs resulted in comparable percentages of cytokine expressing T cells as 8-day cultures. Therefore enrichment can be necessary for detection of T(H) cells specific for a single allergen or allergen-derived peptides, but is dispensable for the detection and phenotyping of allergen-specific T(H) cells using crude extracts.