RESUMO
The challenges posed by COVID-19's emergence have led to a search for its therapies. There is no cure for COVID-19 infection yet, but there is significant progress in vaccine formulation for prophylaxis and drug development (such as Paxlovid) for high-risk patients. As a contribution to the ongoing quest for solutions, this study shows potent phytocompounds identification as inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 targets using in silico methods. We used virtual screening, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the interaction of some phytochemicals with 3CLpro, ACE2, and PLpro proteins crucial to the SARS-CoV-2 viral cycle. The predicted docking scores range from -5.5 to -9.4 kcal/mol, denoting appreciable binding of these compounds to the SARS-CoV-2 proteins and presenting a multitarget inhibition for COVID-19. Some phytocompounds interact favorably at non-active sites of the enzymes. For instance, MD simulation shows that an identified site on PLpro is stable and likely an allosteric region for inhibitor binding and modulation. These phytocompounds could be developed into effective therapy against COVID-19 and probed as potential multitarget-directed ligands and drug candidates against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The study unveils drug repurposing, selectivity, allosteric site targeting, and multitarget-directed ligand in one piece. These concepts are three distinct approaches in the drug design and discovery pipeline.
RESUMO
The escalating burden of tuberculosis disease and drastic effects of current medicine has stimulated a search for alternative drugs. A medicinal plant Warburgia salutaris has been reported to possess inhibitory properties against M. tuberculosis. In this study, we apply computational methods to investigate the probability of W. salutaris compounds as potential inhibitors of M. tuberculosis QcrB protein. We performed molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, radius of gyration, principal component analysis (PCA), and molecular mechanics-generalized born surface area (MM-GBSA) binding-free energy calculations in explicit solvent to achieve our objective. The results suggested that ursolic acid (UA) and ursolic acid acetate (UAA) could serve as preferred potential inhibitors of mycobacterial QcrB compared to lansoprazole sulphide (LSPZ) and telacebec (Q203)-UA and UAA have a higher binding affinity to QcrB compared to LSPZ and Q203 drugs. UA binding affinity is attributed to hydrogen bond formation with Val120, Arg364 and Arg366, and largely resonated from van der Waals forces resulting from UA interactions with hydrophobic amino acids in its vicinity. UAA binds to the porphyrin ring binding site with higher binding affinity compared to LSPZ. The binding affinity results primarily from van der Waals forces between UAA and hydrophobic residues of QcrB in the porphyrin ring binding site where UAA binds competitively. UA and UAA formed stable complexes with the protein with reduced overall residue mobility, consequently supporting the magnitude of binding affinity of the respective ligands. UAA could potentially compete with the porphyrin ring for the binding site and deprive the mycobacterial cell from oxygen, consequently disturbing mycobacterial oxygen-dependent metabolic processes. Therefore, discovery of a compound that competes with porphyrin ring for the binding site may be useful in QcrB pharmocological studies. UA proved to be a superior compound, although its estimated toxicity profile revealed UA to be hepatotoxic within acceptable parameters. Although preliminary findings of this report still warrant experimental validation, they could serve as a baseline for the development of new anti-tubercular drugs from natural resources that target QcrB.