Australian midwives and clinical investigation: Exploration of the personal and professional impact.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of regulation of health professionals is public protection. Concerns regarding professional conduct or midwifery care can lead to clinical investigation. Midwifery literature reveals midwives feel ill-equipped and unprepared for clinical investigation and experience stress and abreaction. AIM: To explore the lived experience of clinical investigation and identify the personal and professional impact on Australian midwives. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews of a purposive sample of Australian midwives. Data analysis was informed by a phenomenological conceptual framework derived from Husserl, Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty. FINDINGS: Twelve midwives were interviewed, with seven under current investigation. Discussion involved personal and professional experiences of three or more investigations each, over a period of three to five years. Most investigations were instigated by hospitals with two complaints from women. Seven participants were alleged negligent following adverse neonatal outcomes and five had misconduct allegations. Midwives were employed or in private practice and half provided homebirth services. Themes included being safe, being connected, time and being, perception and well-being. DISCUSSION: The investigative process involves different health services, state and national bodies using varying powers and processes over protracted time periods. Participants discussed aspects such as disrespect, inequity, powerlessness, silence and ostracization. Midwives who successfully navigated clinical investigation developed resilience through reflection on clinical practice in a culture of safety. CONCLUSION: The process of regulating midwives, designed to protect the Australian public, may be harming investigated midwives. Understanding the personal and professional impact of clinical investigation needs to underpin midwifery education, clinical practice, inform policy and regulatory reform.

Midwife readiness to provide woman-centred weight gain support: Exploring perspectives across models of care.

PROBLEM: More than half of women start pregnancy above a healthy weight and two-thirds gain excess weight during pregnancy, increasing the risk of complications. BACKGROUND: Little research has examined the influence model of care has on weight-related outcomes in pregnancy. AIM: To explore how continuity vs non-continuity models of midwifery care influence perceived readiness to provide woman-centred interventions with women supporting pregnancy weight gain, healthy eating and physical activity. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with midwives working in either continuity or non-continuity models of care at a tertiary hospital in Queensland, Australia. Focus group questions elicited elements around practices, the healthcare environment and woman-centred care skills. Findings were analysed using the Framework Approach to qualitative research. FINDINGS: Four focus groups, involving 15 participants from the continuity of care model and 53 from the non-continuity model, were conducted. Continuity of care participants reported greater readiness to provide woman-centred interventions than those from non-continuity models. Barriers faced by both groups included gaps in communication training, education resources and multidisciplinary support. DISCUSSION: Midwives across models of care require greater support in this area, in particular training in communication and better multidisciplinary service integration to support women. CONCLUSION: The care model appears to influence capacity to deliver person/woman-centred interventions, highlighting the need for tailored training for the healthcare setting. The roles of other health professionals in delivering weight management interventions during pregnancy also need to be examined.

Supporting healthy weight gain and management in pregnancy: Does a mandatory training education session improve knowledge and confidence of midwives?

OBJECTIVE: To examine if a brief midwifery education and training session incorporated into annual mandatory training improves the knowledge and confidence of midwives to support healthy weight gain and management in pregnancy. DESIGN: An implementation evaluation using a pre-post study design was used. Midwives completed a self- administered questionnaire prior to and following completion of the training session. Objective knowledge, perceived knowledge and confidence in relation to nutrition, physical activity and healthy weight gain and management, and process measures related to the training were assessed. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: All midwives from a tertiary birthing hospital in Brisbane Australia who attended the annual mandatory training day in 2015 were invited to participate. MEASUREMENT AND FINDINGS: Of the 270 midwives who attended the training 154 pre and 114 post training questionnaires were returned. An increase in perceived knowledge across topic areas was reported by 70-97% of respondents, while perceived confidence increased for 83-91% of respondents across each topic area. Objective knowledge score increased from 11 pre-training to 15 post training (maximum score 17) (p < 0.001). Ninety six percent of respondents agreed the training provided practical communication strategies and 100% would recommend the training to others. KEY CONCLUSIONS: This brief education session integrated into an existing mandatory training program, improved the knowledge and confidence of midwives in delivering advice and support for healthy pregnancy weight gain. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This improvement is the first step in changing practice to prevent excess weight gain during the antenatal period. This program offers an innovative model to support midwives implement change across other health services. A low cost intervention that was well received by midwives can address identified barriers to the provision of best practice care that supports a healthy pregnancy weight gain in a sustainable forum.

Inpatient care of small and sick newborns: a multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the leading cause of child death worldwide. Small and sick newborns require timely, high-quality inpatient care to survive. This includes provision of warmth, feeding support, safe oxygen therapy and effective phototherapy with prevention and treatment of infections. Inpatient care for newborns requires dedicated ward space, staffed by health workers with specialist training and skills. Many of the estimated 2.8 million newborns that die every year do not have access to such specialised care. METHODS: The bottleneck analysis tool was applied in 12 countries in Africa and Asia as part of the Every Newborn Action Plan process. Country workshops involved technical experts to complete the survey tool, which is designed to synthesise and grade health system "bottlenecks" (or factors that hinder the scale up) of maternal-newborn intervention packages. For this paper, we used quantitative and qualitative methods to analyse the bottleneck data, and combined these with literature review, to present priority bottlenecks and actions relevant to different health system building blocks for inpatient care of small and sick newborns. RESULTS: Inpatient care of small and sick newborns is an intervention package highlighted by all country workshop participants as having critical health system challenges. Health system building blocks with the highest graded (significant or major) bottlenecks were health workforce (10 out of 12 countries) and health financing (10 out of 12 countries), followed by community ownership and partnership (9 out of 12 countries). Priority actions based on solution themes for these bottlenecks are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst major bottlenecks to the scale-up of quality inpatient newborn care are present, effective solutions exist. For all countries included, there is a critical need for a neonatal nursing cadre. Small and sick newborns require increased, sustained funding with specific insurance schemes to cover inpatient care and avoid catastrophic out-of-pocket payments. Core competencies, by level of care, should be defined for monitoring of newborn inpatient care, as with emergency obstetric care. Rather than fatalism that small and sick newborns will die, community interventions need to create demand for accessible, high-quality, family-centred inpatient care, including kangaroo mother care, so that every newborn can survive and thrive.