Value of serum S-100B for prediction of distant relapse and survival in stage III B/C melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The biochemical marker serum S-100B has been proven to reflect the stage of melanoma and to be useful for disease monitoring and prediction of survival, mainly in stage IV disease. For stage III melanoma, limited data are available and its predictive value for relapse is unknown. Serum S-100B was evaluated prospectively for monitoring response and its predictive value for relapse and overall survival in stage IIIB/C melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment consisted of one cycle of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemo(immuno)therapy, around surgery. S-100B was measured at enrollment and prior to and following surgery. The levels of S-100B in serum were compared to the pattern and intensity of the expression of S-100B in the melanoma tissue. RESULTS: Some patients with normal initial S-100B values (n=18) showed responses (3 complete remission and 2 partial remission), in contrast to patients with elevated S-100B values. Distant relapse within one year was found in 11/23 (48%) patients with increased S-100B versus 2/18 (11%) patients with a normal value (p=0.01). Overall survival was decreased in patients with increased S-100B compared to those with normal S-100B (p=0.02). Correlations between the pattern and intensity of S-100B expression in the tumor specimen and the value of serum the S-100B did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Serum S-100B is a valuable biomarker for the evaluation of response to treatment and prediction of early distant relapse and survival in stage IIIB/C melanoma. The marginal correlation between serum S-100B values and expression of S-100B in the tumor specimens needs further study.

Major amputation for intractable extremity melanoma after failure of isolated limb perfusion.

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyse indications and results of amputation for intractable extremity melanoma after failure of isolated limb perfusion (ILP). METHODS: Between 1978 and 2001, 451 patients with loco-regional advanced extremity melanoma underwent 505 ILPs. Amputation of the affected extremity had to be carried out for intractable recurrent disease in 11 of these patients. RESULTS: The indications for amputation were uncontrollable pain (n=2), extensive loco-regional tumour progression (n=4), loss of ankle function due to local tumour growth (n=1), and ulcerating and fungating lesions, not responding to other treatments (n=4). Four patients developed stump recurrence after amputation. Ten patients died of melanoma metastases after a median of 11 months (range 2-110 months). Two patients survived more than 5 years after amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Major amputation is rarely indicated for intractable extremity melanoma but long-term survival can be achieved in selected patients.

Prognostic factors for survival after isolated limb perfusion for malignant melanoma.

AIMS: Risk factors were determined for mortality within 1 year after isolated limb perfusion (ILP). METHODS: All of 439 patients who underwent ILP for melanoma of the extremities were studied. Ninety percent of the patients had MD Anderson stage IIB or III disease at the time of ILP. ILP was performed with melphalan with or without TNFalpha under mild hyperthermic (38-40 degrees C) or normothermic (37-38 degrees C) conditions in 80% of the cases. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients died within this period, 64 of metastatic melanoma. The indication for ILP was an unresectable primary (n=3), a local recurrence (n=24) or adjuvant to excision of primary lesions (n=17) in patients with stage IIIB regional lymph node metastases. These patients or patients with stage IIIAB melanoma with satellites and/or in-transit metastases with regional lymph node metastases had a relative risk of 4.6 (95% CI 2.0-6.6) and 3.6 (95% CI 2.1-10) of dying within 1 year from ILP, respectively (p<0.001). In patients with stage IV disease (distant metastases), the relative risk was 22 (95% CI 3.8-127, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced limb melanoma have an increased risk of death within 1 year after ILP when regional lymph node or distant metastases are present.

Impact of non-axillary sentinel node biopsy on staging and treatment of breast cancer patients.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of lymphatic drainage to non-axillary sentinel nodes and to determine the implications of this phenomenon. A total of 549 breast cancer patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy after intratumoural injection of (99m)Tc-nanocolloid. The sentinel node was intraoperatively identified with the aid of intratumoural administered patent blue dye and a gamma-ray detection probe. Histopathological examination of sentinel nodes included step-sectioning at six levels and immunohistochemical staining. A sentinel node outside level I or II of the axilla was found in 149 patients (27%): internal mammary sentinel nodes in 86 patients, other non-axillary sentinel nodes in 44 and both internal mammary and other non-axillary sentinel nodes in nineteen patients. The intra-operative identification rate was 80%. Internal mammary metastases were found in seventeen patients and metastases in other non-axillary sentinel nodes in ten patients. Staging improved in 13% of patients with non-axillary sentinel lymph nodes and their treatment strategy was changed in 17%. A small proportion of clinically node negative breast cancer patients can be staged more precisely by biopsy of sentinel nodes outside level I and II of the axilla, resulting in additional decision criteria for postoperative regional or systemic therapy.

Regional toxicity after isolated limb perfusion with melphalan and tumour necrosis factor- alpha versus toxicity after melphalan alone.

AIMS: To determine whether the addition of high-dose tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) to isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan increases acute regional tissue toxicity compared to ILP with melphalan alone. METHODS: A retrospective, multivariate analysis of toxicity after normothermic (37--38 degrees C) and 'mild' hyperthermic (38--40 degrees C) ILPs for melanoma was undertaken. Normothermic ILP with melphalan was performed in 294 patients (70.8%), 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan in 71 patients (17.1%) and 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan combined with TNF alpha in 50 patients (12.0%). Toxicity was nil or mild (grades I--II according to Wieberdink et al.) in 339 patients (81.7%), and more severe acute regional toxicity (grades III--V) developed in 76 patients (18.3%). A stepwise logistic regression procedure was performed for the multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for more severe toxicity. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan plus TNF alpha significantly increased the incidence of more severe acute regional toxicity compared to normothermic and 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan alone (36% vs 16% and 17%; P=0.0038). However, after ILP using TNF alpha no grade IV (compartment compression syndrome) or grade V (toxicity necessitating amputation) reactions were seen. Significantly more severe toxicity was seen after ILPs performed between 1991 and 1994 compared with earlier ILPs (33%vs 14%P=0.0001). Also, women had a higher risk of more severe toxicity than men (22% vs 7%; P=0.0007). After multivariate analysis, prognostic factors which remained significant were: sex (P=0.0013) and either ILP schedule (P=0.013) or treatment period (P=0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Regional toxicity after 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan and TNF alpha was significantly increased compared to ILP with melphalan alone. This may be caused by increased thermal enhancement of melphalan due to the higher tissue temperatures (39--40 degrees C) at which the melphalan in the TNF alpha-ILPs was administered or by an interaction between high-dose TNF alpha and melphalan.

Anatomy and physiology of lymphatic drainage of the breast from the perspective of sentinel node biopsy.

Knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the lymphatic system is helpful when considering a particular sentinel node biopsy technique. The delicate balance between internal and external pressures in a lymphatic channel can be influenced by the injection volume and by massage in a negative or positive way. The narrow openings in the interendothelial junctions determine the speed of clearance of particles with a certain size, and this has implications for the timing of lymphoscintigraphy and surgery. Tracer uptake and lymph flow are highly variable and depend on a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control. The lymphatic anatomy is not completely understood despite numerous studies since the end of the 18th century. Several topics have been elucidated in more recent studies and through experience with sentinel node biopsy. First, although axillary drainage is the principal lymphatic path of the breast, any drainage pattern from any quadrant of the breast can occur. Second, most lymph from the breast flows to the nodal basins with a direct course, not passing through the subareolar plexus. Another relevant point is that gentle massage encourages lymph flow and facilitates sentinel node detection. What problems do we still face in clinical practice? The optimum size and number of labeled colloid particles remain to be established. The optimum volume of the tracer also remains to be determined. But the main controversy concerns the injection site. Although the intradermal injection technique has attractive practical features, there is currently insufficient certainty that drainage of tracer injected anywhere in or underneath the skin of the breast reflects drainage from the cancer. Connections between collecting lymphatic vessels from the tumor site and the collecting vessels from the skin and subdermal lymphatics can explain the concordance between intraparenchymal and superficial injections in most patients. To determine the technique that yields the best sentinel node identification rate with the lowest possible false-negative rate would require a large randomized trial with all patients undergoing a complete lymph node dissection and evaluation of all other axillary lymph nodes with serial sections and immunohistochemistry. Current knowledge about sensitivity is based on examination of the other axillary nodes with hematoxylin and eosin staining and not with immunohistochemistry, with the exception of two studies. (33,76) In addition, a complete level I to III dissection may not have been done in all patients, and it is not certain that pathologists removed and examined all the nodes from the specimens. The proposed study seems impossible now that routine axillary node dissection has been abandoned by the larger centers around the world. Choosing the most attractive approach requires determining the aim of lymphatic mapping. A superficial injection technique may be adequate when the purpose is to spare patients without lymph node metastases in the axilla an unnecessary axillary node dissection. An intraparenchymal injection technique should be used when the additional purpose is to determine the stage as accurately as possible and to identify sentinel nodes elsewhere.

Long-term functional morbidity after mild hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with melphalan.

AIMS: To assess long-term functional morbidity in patients entered in the prospective randomized EORTC trial investigating the role of adjuvant isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan for high-risk primary melanoma. METHODS: In 65 patients (ILP 36, wide excision only 29), limb circumference and joint mobility measurements were performed on the treated and the contralateral limb after a mean interval of 48 months after primary treatment. The two treatment groups were comparable regarding age, sex distribution, percentage of skin grafts or regional lymph-node dissections, and interval between primary treatment and physical measurements. RESULTS: None of the patients had severe complaints of the treated limb at the time of analysis. The ankle suffered most from ILP, with a statistical significant restricted extension in approximately 40% of the perfused patients. Abduction of the shoulder was minimally affected in treated upper limbs, probably as a result from the formation of scar tissue after axillary lymph-node dissection. Although no significant differences could be demonstrated in the circumference of upper or lower limbs, atrophy was seen in 24% of perfused lower limbs. Of the five perfused patients who developed oedema, four had also undergone a regional lymph-node dissection. CONCLUSION: This risk of long-term functional morbidity should be weighed against the possible advantages of ILP in patients with limb melanoma or sarcoma.

Relation between limb toxicity and treatment outcomes after isolated limb perfusion for recurrent melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The optimal toxic reaction of the normal tissues in perfused limbs after isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is unknown. Theoretically, more severe limb toxicity could reflect a concomitant increased toxic effect to the tumor and improved outcomes. We determined whether there is a relation between limb toxicity and treatment outcomes after ILP for recurrent limb melanoma. STUDY DESIGN: Among 252 patients with recurrent melanoma of the limbs, treatment outcomes in 192 patients (76%) with no or mild acute limb toxicity were compared with those in 60 (24%) with more severe reactions. Multivariate analysis was used to identify prognostic factors for complete response, limb recurrence-free interval, and survival. RESULTS: Among 112 patients with measurable disease, 65 patients (58%) had a complete response and 27 (42%) experienced a relapse in the perfused limb. For complete response, uninvolved regional lymph nodes (p = 0.0025) and ILP using tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p = 0.0076) appeared to be favorable prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. There was no evidence of a relation between limb toxicity and complete response either in univariate (p = 0.16) or multivariate analysis (p = 0.46). For limb recurrent-free interval, only the number of lesions was a significant prognostic factor (p = 0.047); limb toxicity was not (p = 0.095). In 140 patients with recurrent melanoma excised before or at the moment of ILP, independent prognostic factors for survival were gender, the number of positive nodes, and stage of disease. There was no relation between limb toxicity and survival in either univariate (p = 0.53) or multivariate analysis (p = 0.94). Forty-eight (34%) of the 140 patients had a relapse in the perfused limb. No prognostic factors for limb recurrent-free interval could be identified; limb toxicity was not related to relapse time in univariate or multivariate analyses (p = 0.16 and p = 0.14, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: More severe acute limb toxicity is not associated with improved outcomes. One should aim at grade II toxicity (slight erythema or edema, compatible with complete recovery) at the most to increase the therapeutic ratio of ILP.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with tumour necrosis factor and melphalan as treatment of locally advanced or recurrent soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with various chemotherapeutic agents has been used for the local treatment of high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities, but in most cases with a disappointing result. Most regimens should certainly not be considered superior to surgery plus radiotherapy. Although the majority of extremity STS can be resected locally, some have a very large size and are in close proximity to bones, nerves or blood vessels. In these cases, amputation is the only means of resecting the tumour. A new combination of drugs used in the set-up of HILP with tumour necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan has emerged as a very promising option for the limb-saving management of locally advanced STS. In recent studies, complete response rates of approximately 30% and partial remission rates of 50% have been achieved, while the overall limb-salvage rate is more than 80%.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with various chemotherapeutic agents has been used for the local treatment of high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities, but in most cases, with a disappointing result. Most such regimens certainly should not be considered superior to surgery plus radiotherapy. Although the majority of extremity STS can be resected locally, some are very large and are in close proximity to bone, nerve or blood vessels. In these cases, amputation is the only means of resecting the tumour. A new combination of drugs used in the set-up of HILP with tumour necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan has emerged as a very promising option for the limb-saving management of locally advanced STS. In recent studies, complete response rates of approximately 30% and partial remission rates of 50% have been achieved, while the overall limb-salvage rate is more than 80%.

Toxicity and morbidity of isolated limb perfusion.

Because a relationship between toxicity and treatment outcome has never been demonstrated for isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan, it is important to keep the side-effects of the procedure restricted to a minimum. Risk factors for more severe acute regional toxicity have recently been identified with tissue temperature above 40 degrees C and a high melphalan peak concentration being the most important. Acute regional toxicity should be mild taking into account these factors and maintaining the normal physiological conditions in the limb during ILP. This should also decrease the incidence of long-term morbidity, especially ankle stiffness and muscle atrophy, since a relation between the severity of the acute regional tissue reactions and long-term morbidity has been demonstrated. Lymphedema is strongly linked to a concomitant regional lymph node dissection and this operation may be delayed until the acute regional tissue reactions have faded. It is not yet clear whether the addition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) to melphalan increases regional toxicity. In the absence of melphalan leakage to the systemic circulation, systemic toxicity is minimal; this is also true with TNF-alpha. Compared to ILP with melphalan +/- TNF-alpha, ILP with other drugs is less effective and often is associated with increased regional toxicity.

Rationale for different approaches to combined melphalan and hyperthermia in regional isolated perfusion.

The addition of hyperthermia (HT) to regional isolated perfusion (RIP) with Melphalan theoretically has two advantages. Firstly, heat can selectively kill cells in poorly vascularised areas that are usually not reached by the drug. Secondly, in vitro data have revealed that the effect of Melphalan is enhanced at temperatures 39-45 degrees C. However, for the simultaneous application of Melphalan and HT, as it is given in most institutes, both normal and tumour tissues within the volume are treated with both modalities. It is unclear whether--for the same heat dose--the cytotoxicity of Melphalan is enhanced more in tumour tissue than in normal tissues. As the applied dose of Melphalan in RIP is selected on maximum acceptable toxicity, any enhancement of toxicity is undesired. Indeed, Melphalan application at temperatures > 41 degrees C has resulted in unacceptable toxicity. In most institutes, the hyperthermia dose is reduced in comparison to application as a single-modality treatment, to allow simultaneous combination without unacceptable toxicity. In this review, the rationale for two different approaches is summarised which may make it possible to improve the benefit from the theoretical advantage of the use of HT in RIP. It is meant to stimulate discussion as a possible first step in the design of new treatment protocols.

Repeat isolated limb perfusion with melphalan for recurrent melanoma of the limbs.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma recurring locoregionally after isolated limb perfusion (ILP) constitutes a therapeutic dilemma. Major amputation is a deterrent option for local control and palliation in these patients who have a rather poor prognosis. Little is known about the feasibility and efficacy of repeat ILP in these situations. STUDY DESIGN: From 1978 to 1993, 28 patients with recurrent melanoma after ILP were retreated with various ILP procedures using melphalan. Eighteen patients underwent reperfusion by a single and four by a multiple normothermic schedule. Hyperthermia was applied in six repeat ILP procedures. RESULTS: A complete remission was achieved in 14 (74 percent) of 19 patients with measurable disease, with a median limb recurrence-free interval of 11 months. A partial remission was obtained in one patient (5 percent). Two patients had no change of disease and two patients had progressive disease. In the remaining nine patients, all macroscopic tumor tissue was excised before or during the repeat ILP procedure. The median limb recurrence-free interval of these nine patients was 15 months. After a median follow-up period of 30 months after repeat ILP, seven (25 percent) of the 28 total patients were alive without disease. Acute regional tissue toxicity was more severe after repeat ILP than after the first procedure (p < 0.05). Long-term regional morbidity occurred in 11 percent of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: A high complete remission rate can be obtained with repeat ILP using melphalan. However, the high limb recurrence rate and relatively short limb recurrence-free interval need improvement. Increased acute regional toxicity after repeat ILP can be explained by the use of more intensive schedules.

FDG-PET to evaluate response to hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion for locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.

UNLABELLED: We investigated FDG-PET in patients undergoing hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with rTNF-alpha, rIFN-gamma and melphalan for locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities. METHODS: Twenty patients (11 women, 9 men; aged 18-80 yr, mean age 49 yr) were studied. FDG-PET studies were performed before, 2 and 8 wk after HILP. After the final PET study, the tumor was resected and pathologically graded. Patients with pathologically complete response (pCR) showed no viable tumor after treatment. Those with pathologically partial response (pPR) showed various amounts of viable tumor in the resected specimens. RESULTS: Seven patients showed a pCR (35%) and 12 patients showed a pPR (60%). In one patient, pathological examination was not performed (5%). The pre-perfusion glucose consumption in the pCR group was significantly higher than in the pPR group (p<0.05). Visual analysis of the PET images after perfusion showed a rim of increased FDG uptake around the core of absent FDG uptake in 12 patients. The rim signal contained a fibrous pseudocapsule with inflammatory tissue in the pCR group, viable tumor was seen in the pPR group. The glucose consumption in the pCR group at 2 and 8 wk after perfusion had decreased significantly (p<0.05) in comparison to the glucose consumption in the pPR. CONCLUSION: Based on the pretreatment glucose consumption in soft-tissue sarcomas, one could predict the probability of a patient achieving complete pathological response after HILP. FDG-PET indicated the pathological tumor response to HILP, although the lack of specificity of FDG, in terms of differentiation between an inflammatory response and viable tumor tissue, hampered the discrimination between pCR and pPR.

Physiological implications of hyperbaric oxygen tensions in isolated limb perfusion using melphalan: a pilot study.

Controversy exists concerning the optimal pO2 of the perfusate during isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan. Therefore we studied the implications of hyperbaric oxygen tensions in the perfusate. In 12 consecutive patients, subcutaneous pO2 (Continucath 1000), tissue and tumor pH, and blood gas values were monitored throughout the ILP procedure. ILP started with an oxygen flow through the bubble oxygenator which was set routinely at one half of the flow of the perfusate; 30 min before the end of ILP, the oxygen flow was tripled. Mean arterial pO2 before and during ILP (before and after increasing the oxygen supply) was 19.4, 25.5 and 49.4 kPa, respectively. Mean subcutaneous pO2 values before, during (before and after increasing the oxygen supply), and post-ILP, were 7.4, 10.1, 16.3, and 9.1 kPa, respectively. Tissue pH values in the subcutis and muscle decreased during routine oxygen supply (p = 0.001); muscle pH moved towards starting values after increase of the oxygen supply (p = 0.011). In 4 patients, tumor pH was recorded showing a rise after increasing the oxygen supply (from 7.10 to 7.22; p = 0.11). In conclusion, high pO2 in the perfusate improves muscle pH during ILP. However, a concomitant rise in tumor pH may unfavorably influence the therapeutic effect of ILP, as it has been shown that low pH increases the cytotoxicity of melphalan.

Severe acute regional toxicity after normothermic or 'mild' hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with melphalan for melanoma.

Incidence, nature and cause of severe acute regional toxicity were studied in 181 patients who underwent normothermic (37-38 degrees C) or 'mild' hyperthermic (38-40 degrees C) isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan. The known risk factors for toxicity (sex, tissue temperature, blood gas values, isolation level and melphalan peak concentration) were analysed. Severe acute regional toxicity occurred in 30 patients (16%). The limb was painful, swollen, red and warm in 19, often with a smooth and glistening aspect. Blistering scattered over the extremity was seen in 11 cases. In another 11 patients, late blistering limited to the footsole or handpalm developed. Twenty-six patients with severe toxicity had undergone ILP at the iliac isolation level (p < 0.05). Sex and tissue temperature did not predict toxicity. Venous perfusate blood gas values were severely deteriorated in four patients; high calculated melphalan peak concentrations occurred in nine patients. Irreversible long-term morbidity as a sequence of severe toxicity occurred in 10 of the 30 patients. Only one of the 11 patients with late blisters limited to sole or palm developed long-term morbidity (p < 0.05). Thus, the only risk factor for severe acute regional toxicity that could be identified was iliac isolation level. However, in 27 of the 30 patients two or more risk factors were found.