Chromatographic Evaluation and Characterization of Constituents of Sunflower Seed Extract Used as Food Additives.

Sunflower seed extract, an antioxidant agent registered on the List of Existing Food Additives in Japan, was evaluated using HPLC, and three common constituents were detected. These peaks were identified as monocaffeoylquinic acids (3-O-caffeoylquinic acid, 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid, and 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid [chlorogenic acid]). Upon scrutinizing other components, dicaffeoylquinic acids (isochlorogenic acids; 3,4-di-O-caffeoylquinic, 3,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic, and 4,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acids) were also identified. Structures of two newly isolated compounds were determined to be 3-O-(3S-2-oxo-3-hydroxy-indole-3-acetyl)-5-O-caffeoylquinic and 4-O-(3S-2-oxo-3-hydroxy-indole-3-acetyl)-5-O-caffeoylquinic acids. To identify the components that contribute to the antioxidant activity of sunflower seed extract, we fractionated the food additive sample solution and examined the active fractions for 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity. Monocaffeoylquinic and dicaffeoylquinic acids showed high DPPH activity, including their contribution to the antioxidant activity of this food additive. DPPH radical scavenging activity of the new compounds showed almost the same value as that of the positive control, Trolox. Therefore, the contribution of these compounds was also considered.

A new single-reference quantitative method using liquid chromatography with relative molar sensitivity based on 1H-qNMR for khellactone esters from Peucedanum japonicum root extract.

Khellactone ester (KLE) quantification using the absolute calibration method is difficult owing to the unavailability of standard reagents that can guarantee purity. Herein, a new method was developed to quantify KLEs from Peucedanum japonicum root extracts using liquid chromatography (LC) without utilizing standards. This method used relative molar sensitivity (RMS) and 7-ethoxy-4-methylcoumarin as a single-reference (SR) compound instead of KLE standards. RMS is the sensitivity ratio of SR to analytes, determined using an offline combination of quantitative NMR and LC. LC was performed using a triacontylsilyl silica gel column of superficially porous particles with a ternary mobile phase. The range of the method was 2.60-509 µmol/L. The accuracy and precision were reasonable. This is the first study to apply the RMS method to both conventional LC and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography using the same mobile phase and column. This method may aid the quality assurance of foods containing KLEs.

[Determination of Allyl Isothiocyanate in Mustard and Horseradish Extracts by Single Reference GC and HPLC Based on Relative Molar Sensitivities].

The main component of the Mustard and Horseradish extracts, which are used as natural food additives in Japan, is allyl isothiocyanate (AITC). The determination of AITC using GC-FID is the official method employed in the quality control assessments for these products. In this method, a commercially available AITC reagent is used as a calibrant. However, 1H-quantitative NMR (qNMR) analysis revealed that the AITC reagents contain impurity. Therefore, we examined the GC-FID and HPLC-refractive index detector (LC-RID) method based on relative molar sensitivities (RMSs) to high-purity single reference (SR). The RMSs of AITC/SR under the GC-FID and LC-RID conditions were accurately determined using qNMR. The AITC in two types of food additives was quantified using qNMR, SR GC-FID, and SR LC-RID methods. Both SR GC-FID and SR LC-RID showed good agreement within 2% with the AITC content determined by direct qNMR.

Determination of Mogroside V in Luohanguo Extract for Daily Quality Control Operation Using Relative Molar Sensitivity to Single-Reference Caffeine.

Mogroside V is one of the characteristic and effective components of luohanguo extract, a food additive used as a sweetener in Japan as per Japan's Standards and Specifications for Food Additives (JSFA; 9th ed.). JSFA stipulates that the quantitative determination for mogroside V content in luohanguo extract applies HPLC using analytical standard mogroside V. However, no mogroside V reagents with proven purities are commercially available. Therefore the current JSFA determination method is not particularly suited for daily quality control operations involving luohanguo extract. In this study, we applied an alternative quantitative method using a single reference with relative molar sensitivity (RMS). It was possible to calculate the accurate RMS by an offline combination of 1H-quantitative NMR spectroscopy (1H-qNMR) and an HPLC/variable-wavelength detector (VWD). Using the RMS of mogroside V to a commercial certified reference material grade caffeine, the mogroside V contents in luohanguo extracts could be determined using HPLC/VWD without analytical standard mogroside V. There was no significant difference between the mogroside V contents in luohanguo extracts determined using the method employing single-reference caffeine with the RMS and using the JSFA method. The absolute calibration curve for the latter was prepared using an analytical standard mogroside V whose purity was determined by 1H-qNMR. These results demonstrate that our proposed method using a single reference with RMS is suitable for quantitative determination of mogroside V in luohanguo extract and can be used as an alternative method to the current assay method in JSFA.

Quantification of tea-derived catechins without the requirement for respective calibration curves by single reference liquid chromatography based on relative molar sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Many studies report the monitoring of catechins in tea samples by chromatographic techniques. Unfortunately, only a small number of screening assays for catechins exist as a result of the complexity of authentic standards for the respective calibration curves. In the present study, a single reference (SR) exhaustive assay for the simultaneous quantification of tea-derived catechins by liquid chromatography (LC) with photodiode array and fluorescence detectors based on relative molar sensitivity (RMS) was developed as a screening assay of common tea samples without respective calibration curves using authentic standards. RESULTS: Three original SR standards were proposed based on flavonoid structures, evaluated by quantitative 1 H-NMR based on an indirect standard (1,4-bis(trimethylsilyl) benzene-d4 ) and successfully separated in a LC chromatogram. In tea samples with these added SR calculated based on RMS, the concentrations of eight tea-derived catechins could be measured with a relative SD of < 8.5% by a single LC run. CONCLUSION: This LC screening assay based on RMS allows reliable quantification without the requirement for respective calibration curves using authentic standards. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.

Determination of perillaldehyde in perilla herbs using relative molar sensitivity to single-reference diphenyl sulfone.

Perillaldehyde (PRL) is one of the essential oil components derived from perilla plants (Perilla frutescens Britton) and is a characteristic compound of the traditional medicine "perilla herb ()" listed in the The Japanese Pharmacopoeia, 17th edition (JP17). HPLC using an analytical standard of PRL has been used to quantitatively determine the PRL content in perilla herb. However, PRL reagents have been reported to decompose easily. In this study, we utilized an alternative quantitative method using on a single reference with relative molar sensitivity (RMS) based on the results of experiments performed in two laboratories. It was possible to calculate the exact RMS using an offline combination of 1H-quantitative NMR spectroscopy (1H-qNMR) and an HPLC/photodiode array (PDA) detector (or an HPLC/variable-wavelength detector [VWD]). Using the RMS of PRL to the single-reference compound diphenyl sulfone (DFS), which is an inexpensive and stable compound, the PRL content in the perilla herb could be determined using HPLC/PDA or HPLC/VWD without the need for the analytical standard of PRL. There was no significant difference between the PRL contents of perilla herb determined using the method employing the single-reference DFS with RMS and using the JP17 assay, the calibration curve of which was generated using the analytical standard of PRL with adjusted purity measured by 1H-qNMR. These results demonstrate that our proposed method using a single reference with RMS is suitable for quantitative assays of perilla herb and can be an alternative method for the current assay method defined in the JP17.

[Quantitative Analysis of Piperine and the Derivatives in Long Pepper Extract by HPLC Using Relative Molar Sensitivity].

A novel method was developed for quantification of five major piperine derivatives (piperanine, piperine, chavicine, isopiperine, and isochavicine) in a hot water extract of long pepper fruit (LPE) using the relative molar sensitivity (RMS) based on the combination of HPLC/UV and 1H- quantitative NMR (1H-qNMR). The RMSs of piperanine, chavicine, isopiperine, and isochavicine to piperine of which the absolute purity was determined by 1H-qNMR were calculated to be 0.3693, 1.138, 0.9164, and 1.277, respectively. The total amount of piperine derivatives in LPE was quantified by both 1H-qNMR and HPLC/UV based on the RMS using piperine as a single-reference material (RMS method). The relative difference in quantitation values of 1H-qNMR and calibration curve method from the RMS method was 2.01% or less. The relative difference of the total cis-trans piperine isomers content between before and after photoirradiation in piperine solution was quantified to be 2.84% by the RMS method. In addition, the interlaboratory difference of the RMS method was confirmed in the range of 0.600 to 4.00 µg/g when analysis was performed on piperine derivatives in LPE containing tablets, while the total amount of piperine derivatives in the tablets was quantified at 606 µg/g. Our proposed method is a reliable tool for determining the contents of piperine and the derivatives in LPE and processed foods containing LPE.

Determination and purification of sesamin and sesamolin in sesame seed oil unsaponified matter using reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled with photodiode array and tandem mass spectrometry and high-speed countercurrent chromatography.

In Asian countries, sesame seed oil unsaponified matter is used as a natural food additive due to its associated antioxidant effects. We determined and purified the primary lignans sesamin and sesamolin in sesame seed oil unsaponified matter using reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled with photodiode array and tandem mass spectrometry and high-speed countercurrent chromatography. Calibration curves showed good correlation coefficients (r2 > 0.999, range 0.08 and/or 0.15 to 5 µg/mL) with a limit of detection (at 290 nm) of 0.02 µg/mL for sesamin and 0.04 µg/mL for sesamolin. Sesame seed oil unsaponified matter contained 2.82% sesamin and 2.54% sesamolin, respectively. Direct qualitative analysis of sesamin and sesamolin was achieved using quadrupole mass spectrometry with positive-mode electrospray ionization. Pure (>99%) sesamin and sesamolin standards were obtained using high-speed countercurrent chromatographic purification (hexane/ethyl acetate/methanol/water; 7:3:7:3). An effective method for determining and purifying sesamin and sesamolin from sesame seed oil unsaponified matter was developed by combining these separation techniques for standardized food additives.

[Development of a Novel Method for Quantifying Quassin and Neoquassin in Jamaica Quassia Extracts Using the Molar Absorption Coefficient Ratio].

A novel HPLC-based method employing molar absorption coefficient ratios to 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4HBA) was developed for the determination of quassin and neoquassin in Jamaica quassia extract, which is used as a food additive in Japan. Based on comparisons of quantitative NMR (qNMR) spectra and HPLC chromatograms of an artificial mixture of quassin, neoquassin, and 4HBA, the molar absorption coefficient ratios of quassin and neoquassin to 4HBA were determined as 0.84 and 0.85, respectively. Quassin and neoquassin were quantified in food additives by qNMR and HPLC based on molar absorption coefficient ratios using 1,4-bis(trimethylsilyl)benzene-d4 and 4HBA as internal standards, respectively. The differences in quantitation values between qNMR and HPLC analyses were below 1.2%. Our proposed novel HPLC-based quantitation method employing the molar absorption coefficient ratios is a reliable tool for determining levels of quassin and neoquassin in food additives and processed foods.