Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Environ Int ; 171: 107674, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36463658

RESUMO

PM2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 µm) is a well-known cytotoxic pollutant that capable to induce severe intracellular oxidative stress while the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Herein, 4 types of PM2.5 derived from solid fuel burning were selected as stimuli in A549 cells exposure model to evaluate their effects on oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. Although resulting in different responses in cell viability, all PM2.5 exhibited over 50 % higher oxidative stress than control group, expression as intracellular reactive oxygen species, malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase levels. The Pearson's correlation results indicated that cations (e.g., Ca2+), heavy metals (e.g., Cr and Pb), nPAHs (nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, e.g., 6-nitrochrysene) and oPAHs (oxygenated PAHs, e.g., 9-fluorenone) were the main functioning toxics (r > 0.6). A key finding was the dual-directional regulation function of ECG (epicatechin gallate), that is, it could either increase the low A549 cell viabilities in coal combustion PM2.5 group or reduce them in charcoal PM2.5 group (P < 0.05). The dual-directional effects were likely because ECG can activate Nrf2 oxidation signaling pathway then inhibit the inflammatory signaling pathway NF-κB accordingly. Therefore, evidences indicated cytotoxicity of solid fuel derived PM2.5 were mainly caused by oxidative stress, which was proved to be reversed by green tea, providing a potential therapy method to PM2.5 and other hazards.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos , Humanos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/toxicidade , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Células A549 , Chá , Material Particulado/toxicidade , Material Particulado/análise , Estresse Oxidativo , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análise
2.
Chemosphere ; 221: 184-192, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30639814

RESUMO

Characteristics of indoor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and their health risks were investigated in kitchens and bedrooms during the heating season in rural Guanzhong Plain, China. Toxic-VOC concentrations in kitchens with traditional wood (299 ±â€¯38.8 µg m-3) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) stoves (187 ±â€¯54.6 µg m-3) were considerably higher than those in bedrooms. High levels of toxic VOCs in traditional kitchens were strongly correlated with wood combustion (R = 0.72). The coefficient of determination of VOC profiles between the kitchen and wood combustion was 0.27, indicating that VOCs in traditional kitchens are mainly derived from wood combustion. For women, who do most of the cooking, noncancer risk from exposure to toxic VOCs could reach 7600 and 2550 in traditional and LPG kitchens, respectively. Noncancer risks were much lower in bedrooms than in kitchens, but still two orders of magnitude higher than the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) threshold. Cancer risk from exposure to VOCs for women was 8.98 × 10-4 and 1.67 × 10-4 in both traditional and LPG kitchens, respectively, and ranged from 2.51 × 10-6 to 3.85 × 10-5 in bedrooms-all exceeding the USEPA threshold. Thus, during the heating season indicated that the rural Guanzhong residents were exposed to toxic VOCs from indoor heating and cooking at levels higher than the recommended safety levels. Moreover, traditional cooking and heating styles in rural Guanzhong need to be urgently updated to improve the indoor air quality for residents.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Culinária , Calefação/efeitos adversos , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis/análise , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , China , Feminino , Habitação , Humanos , Petróleo/efeitos adversos , Estações do Ano , Estados Unidos , Madeira/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA