A randomised, multinational study with sequential therapy comparing ciprofloxacin twice daily and ofloxacin once daily.

In a multinational, open, randomised, controlled clinical study, 474 hospitalised patients with moderate or severe infections were treated with sequential regimens of ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. Ofloxacin 400 mg once daily or ciprofloxacin 200 mg twice daily were given intravenously for at least 3 days followed by oral treatment with ofloxacin 400 mg once daily or ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily. Overall cure rates of 86.8% (85.7%) in the ofloxacin group and 89.6 (89.5%) in the ciprofloxacin group were achieved in the intention-to-treat analysis (per protocol analysis). The overall bacteriological response rate (ofloxacin 89.5%, ciprofloxacin 89.0%) was comparable to the clinical cure rate. Both drugs were well tolerated and adverse events were rarely observed. It is concluded that ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin can be used successfully in the treatment of hospitalised patients with aerobic gram-positive and gram-negative infections. Ofloxacin has the advantage of a once-daily regimen, compared to the twice-daily regimen with ciprofloxacin.

[3-dimensional topography of the optic papilla with laser scanning tomography: clinical correlation of cluster analysis]. / Dreidimensionale Papillentopographie mittels Laser Scanning Tomographie: Klinisches Korrelat einer Cluster-Analyse.

BACKGROUND The evaluation of optic disc topography is essential for the clinical diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma. The purpose of this study was (1) to establish a computerized cluster formation of optic nerve head topography based on quantitative three-dimensional parameter values and (2) to describe the resulting clusters according to morphological appearance and visual fields. PATIENTS AND METHODS 337 optic nerve heads (glaucomatous optic neuropathy (n = 99), glaucoma suspects (n = 159), normals (n = 79) were analyzed using laser scanning tomography. A hierarchical cluster analysis was performed based on standardized variables (optic disc area, rim area, area-ratio, cup depth, cup steepness, height variations along the contour-line). Visual fields were tested by computerized static threshold perimetry. RESULTS A seven cluster solution met the optimizing criteria. The characteristic morphology of the clusters can be described as "normal" (N), "normal, large" (NL), "supernormal" (SN), "pseudonormal" (PN), "glaucoma-like-flat" (GF), "glaucoma-like-steep" (GS) and "macropapillary" (M). Visual fields were normal in 180 eyes. 99 eyes had glaucomatous field defects, 58 eyes revealed isolated relative scotomas < 10 db. Presence and degree of visual field defects varied within the automatically classified optic disc groups considerably. Visual field defects were found in 7.7% (SN), 8.3% (N), 18.8% (NL), 33.3% (M), 37% (PN), 64.7% (GF) and 83.3% (GS) respectively. Pseudonormal discs were characterized by a flattening of the height variations along the disc border. CONCLUSIONS (1) Optic nerve heads may be automatically classified based upon a combination of three-dimensional topographic variables. (2) Analysis of optic disc topography and computerized perimetry are supplementary tools in the evaluation of the glaucoma patient. Visual field defects may be present within any cluster. However, the likelyness of the presence of visual field defects differs considerably among the topometrically defined groups of optic nerve heads. Functional damage is to be expected in association with reduced height variations along the disc border, a small rim area and a steep cupping of the optic nerve head.