NCCN Guideline Concordance Improves Survival in Pediatric and Young Adult Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although management guidelines in adult rectal cancer are widely studied, no consensus guidelines exist for the management of pediatric and young adult rectal cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2004-2018) was queried for pediatric (age 0-21) and young adult (age 22-40) patients with rectal cancer. Patients were analyzed for receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-concordant therapy. Impact on survival was evaluated using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: 6655 patients (108 pediatric and 6547 young adult patients) with rectal cancer were included. Similar to previously published NCCN quality measures with overall guideline concordance approaching 90 % in adults, 89.6 % of pediatric and 84.6 % of young adult patients were classified as receiving pre-operative guideline-concordant therapy. However, pediatric patients were significantly less likely to receive post-operative guideline-concordant therapy than young adult patients (65.3 % verse 76.7 %, respectively, p = 0.008). Risk of death was significantly lower for pediatric patients who received post-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.313; CI, 0.168-0.581; p < 0.001). In young adult patients, risk of death was significantly lower for those who received pre-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.376, CI 0.338-0.417, p < 0.001), and post-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.456; CI 0.413-0.505; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: NCCN-based guidelines may reasonably guide peri-operative management decisions and improve survival in pediatric and young adult rectal cancer. Given the rarity of this cancer in young patients, employment of an experienced surgical and oncologic multidisciplinary team, along with discussion and involvement of the patient and family, are keys for balancing risks and benefits to offering the best therapeutic strategy. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Recovery of Skill Decay After COVID-19 Redeployments and Implications for Competency Attainment.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic immediately interrupted procedural training. The lasting impact of reduced caseloads and service redeployments on procedural-resident training has been underexplored. This longitudinal study investigated the long-term perspectives of skill decay after short breaks in training and implications for ensuring resident competency attainment. METHODS: Web-based cross-sectional surveys distributed immediately after (June 2020) compared to 1 y after (July 2021) COVID-19 redeployments at two tertiary academic medical centers of an integrated health system in New York. Participants included general surgery, surgical subspecialty, and anesthesiology residents and faculty. RESULTS: Fifty-five residents and 33 faculty completed the survey. Ninety-point nine percent of residents and 36.4% of faculty were redeployed to COVID-ICUs. Sixty-three-point seven percent of residents and 75.0% of faculty reported a reduction in resident technical skills in the short-term, with significantly less (45.5% of residents and 21.2% of faculty) reporting persistent reduction in technical skill after 1 y (P = 0.001, P < 0.001). Seventy-five percent of residents and 100% of faculty were confident residents would be able to practice independently at the conclusion of their training. Sixty-five-point five percent of residents and 63.6% of faculty felt that residents experienced a durable improvement in critical care skills. Residents also reported a positive long-term impact on professional core competencies at 1 y. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal surveillance of residents after COVID-19 redeployments suggests washout of temporary skill decay and return of resident confidence upon resumption of traditional training. This may provide insight into the impact of other short-term training interruptions on resident skill and promote greater resident support upon training resumption to ensure competency attainment.