A low-carbohydrate diet with different fatty acids' sources in the treatment of obesity: Impact on insulin resistance and adipogenesis.

BACKGROUND: The search for nutritional intervention strategies against obesity has grown, highlighting the low-carbohydrate diet model. However, little is known about the impact of the quality of fatty acids consumed in this diet. Thus, we aim to investigate the influence of fatty acid quality on dietary strategy on obesity. METHODS: Male Swiss mice were diet-induced to obesity. Afterward, mice consume a low-carb diet with different types of fat: saturated, polyunsaturated ω-3, ω-6, and monounsaturated ω-9 fatty acids. Weight gain and food consumption were monitored weekly. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed and blood and tissue samples were collected for analysis of insulin resistance markers. Protein expression of insulin signaling pathway molecules, lipid metabolism, mitochondrial function, macrophage polarization, and cytokine production were analyzed. RESULTS: The high-fat diet was able to induce obesity and glucose intolerance. The switch to a low-carbohydrate dietary pattern reversed the glucose intolerance, with better results in the ω-3 and ω-9 groups. After the low-carbohydrate diet, groups ω-3 and ω-9 presented improved fasting serum glucose, insulin, and HOMA indexes. The low-carbohydrate diet also increased the activity of insulin pathway proteins such as IR, IRS1, and AKT. Furthermore, the ω-3 diet group showed greater activity of mitochondrial complexes and AMPK signaling pathway proteins. The ω-6 and ω-9 -rich diet induced M2-type macrophage polarization, as well as cytokine production modulation by the low-carbohydrate diet in the ω-3 and ω-9 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Consuming a low-carbohydrate diet pattern promotes weight loss and improves glucose intolerance in obesity. Also, the quality of lipids has a direct influence, demonstrating that the consumption of ω-3 polyunsaturated and ω-9 monounsaturated lipids can lead to more favorable outcomes for the improvement of glucose intolerance, lipid metabolism, and anti-inflammatory effects.

Distinct inflammatory profiles in HIV-infected individuals under antiretroviral therapy using cannabis, cocaine or cannabis plus cocaine.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of cannabis and/or cocaine use on inflammatory, oxidative stress status and circulating monocyte subsets in HIV-infected individuals under antiretroviral therapy. DESIGN: Soluble CD14 (sCD14), intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (IFABP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, C-reactive protein (CRP) and oxidative stress markers were examined. The monocyte subsets and their activation and cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of HIV-1 infected individuals upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulation were also investigated. METHODS: sCD14, IFABP, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 levels were evaluated using ELISA, CRP by turbidimetry; lipid peroxidation (TBARS) spectrofluometrically and total thiol levels by using 5-5'-dithio-bis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) reagent. Monocyte subsets and activation were assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: All HIV-infected drug user groups showed higher sCD14 levels compared with HIV+ nondrug users. IFABP was increased in HIV+ drug-users in relation to healthy individuals. Cannabis use lowered the percentages of inflammatory, nonclassical, activated-classic and activated-inflammatory monocytes. Cocaine users showed increased plasmatic TNF-α and TBARS levels, decreased thiols content and lower activated-classic and inflammatory-monocyte percentages. Cannabis-plus-cocaine use increased CRP, IL-8 and IL-6/IL-10 ratio, but decreased thiol content, and inflammatory and activated-classic monocyte percentages. PBMCs of cannabis and cannabis-plus-cocaine users showed low-potential cytokine production either spontaneously or under LPS-stimulation. CONCLUSION: In HIV infection, the use of cannabis induces predominantly an anti-inflammatory profile. The use of cocaine and cannabis-plus-cocaine showed a mixed pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory profile, with predominance of inflammatory status. Further studies are required to better understand the action of these drugs in HIV infection.