Use of a surgical specimen-collection kit to improve mediastinal lymph-node examination of resectable lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Pathologic examination of mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer is critical in the determination of prognosis and postoperative management. Although systematic nodal dissection is recommended, the quality of pathologic lymph-node staging often falls short of recommendations in practice. We tested the feasibility of improving pathologic lymph-node staging of resectable non-small-cell lung cancer by using a prelabeled specimen-collection kit. METHODS: Case-control study with comparison of 51 resections, using a special lymph-node collection kit, with 51 controls matched for surgeon, extent of resection, pathologist, and T category. Appropriate statistical methods were used for all comparisons. RESULTS: The median number of MLNs examined increased from one in the control group, to six in the case group (p < 0.001). The percentage of resections attaining the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended quality of MLN examination, and the proportion that would have been eligible for recent landmark postresection adjuvant therapy trials increased significantly (p < 0.001). The duration of surgery and postoperative complication rates were similar between cases and controls. Eighteen percent of kit cases had positive MLN, compared with 8% of controls. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a specialized specimen-collection kit for MLN examination was feasible, markedly improved MLN staging, and showed a trend toward increased detection of patients with MLN metastasis, with only a modest increase in duration of surgery, and no increase in perioperative morbidity, mortality, or hospital length of stay.

Quality of surgical resection for nonsmall cell lung cancer in a US metropolitan area.

BACKGROUND: Curative treatment of early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requires good quality surgical resection (GQR). The degree of compliance with national recommendations for GQR is poorly defined. We sought to quantitatively define the degree of compliance in a consecutive series of NSCLC resections. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent curative-intent resection for NSCLC in the Memphis, TN metropolitan area from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2007 were retrospectively reviewed (N = 746 patients). GQR criteria were obtained from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the RADIANT adjuvant study of erlotinib, and the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0030 study. Factors associated with or without achievement of GQR were evaluated. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher exact test, and survival curves by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-three and one-half percent of patients met GQR criteria as established by RADIANT, 8.2% by NCCN, and 0.9% by ACOSOG. The most common limiting factor in achieving GQR was inadequate lymph node sampling. The only patient factor associated with GQR was race (African-Americans were more likely than Caucasians to have GQR per RADIANT and NCCN criteria [P = .022 and P = .0489, respectively]). There was no significant survival difference between GQR and non-GQR patients. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of curative-intent resections did not achieve GQR standards. The greatest deficit is in surgical sampling of mediastinal (Level 2) lymph nodes, but evaluation of Level 1 lymph nodes is also suboptimal. Interventions are needed to improve current surgical practices and achieve minimum standards for accurate staging, prognostication, and eligibility for clinical trials.

Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries. Part II: strategies for containment.

The growing threat from resistant organisms calls for concerted action to prevent the emergence of new resistant strains and the spread of existing ones. Developing countries have experienced unfavourable trends in resistance-as detailed in part I, published last month--and implementation of many of the containment strategies recommended by WHO is complicated by universal, as well as developing country-specific, factors. The control of selective pressure for resistance could potentially be addressed through educational and other interventions for orthodox and unorthodox prescribers, distributors, and consumers of antimicrobials. At national levels, the implementation of drug use strategies--eg, combination therapy or cycling--may prove useful to lengthen the lifespan of existing and future agents. Programmes such as the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses (IMCI) and directly observed short-course therapy (DOTS) for tuberculosis are prescriber-focused and patient-focused, respectively, and have both been shown to positively influence factors that contribute to the selective pressure that affects resistance. The institution of interventions to prevent the transmission of infectious diseases could also lead to beneficial effects on the prevalence of resistance, as has vaccination against Haemophilus influenzae type B and Streptococcus pneumoniae. There has been an upsurge in the number of organisations and programmes that directly address issues of resistance, and collaboration could be one way to stem the dire trend. Additional factors such as unregulated drug availability, inadequate antimicrobial drug quality assurance, inadequate surveillance, and cultures of antimicrobial abuse must be addressed to permit a holistic strategy for resistance control.