Intravenous Compatibility of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam Using Simulated and Actual Y-site Administration.

PURPOSE: The objective of this communication was to determine the intravenous compatibility of ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam using simulated and actual Y-site administration. METHODS: Ceftazidime-avibactam was reconstituted and diluted to concentrations of 8, 25, and 50 mg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride. Aztreonam was reconstituted and diluted to concentrations of 10 and 20 mg/mL. Each combination of concentrations was tested for compatibility using visual, Tyndall beam, microscopy, turbidity, and pH assessments. Microscopy results were compared to those from sodium chloride 0.9% in water, pH was compared to that at time 0, and turbidity of combinations was compared to that of individual agents. Actual Y-site mixing was conducted over 2-h infusions with samples collected at 0, 1, and 2 h. Test results were evaluated at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after mixing. All experiments were completed in triplicate. FINDINGS: Across simulated and actual Y-site experiments, no evidence of incompatibility between combinations of ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam was observed. Visual and microscopic tests revealed no particulate matter, color changes, or turbidity. Tyndall beam tests were negative with all combinations. No evidence of incompatibility was observed in turbidity testing. The pH values were consistent across each of the 6 combinations, from immediately after mixing until 12 h after mixing. When the addition of agents was reversed in simulated Y-site experiments, no differences in compatibility were observed. No differences in compatibility between actual and simulated Y-site administration were observed, and there was minimal variability across all replicate experiments. IMPLICATIONS: Ceftazidime-avibactam, at concentrations of 8, 25, and 50 mg/mL, appeared compatible with aztreonam at concentrations of 10 and 20 mg/mL.

Approach to the Treatment of Patients with Serious Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections.

Multidrug resistance(MDR) among Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) isolates presents a significant clinical challenge and can substantially complicate the approach to selection of optimal antibiotic therapy. This review addresses major considerations in antibiotic selection for patients with suspected or documented serious MDR-PSA infections. Common mechanisms contributing to MDR among clinical PSA isolates are summarized. Empiric and definitive therapy considerations are addressed including the potential role of combination therapy. Newer agents with in vitro activity against MDR-PSA (e.g., ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, and cefiderocol) and their potential roles in clinical settings are discussed. Although these newer agents are promising options for the treatment of MDR-PSA, clinical data remain generally limited. Future studies are needed to determine optimal agents for the empiric and definitive treatment of MDR-PSA.

Assessment of mortality stratified by meropenem minimum inhibitory concentration in patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia: A patient-level analysis of published data.

In 2010, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) lowered carbapenem breakpoints to reduce the proportion of 'susceptible' organisms that produced carbapenemases. Few studies have evaluated the effect of this change on clinical outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of carbapenem MICs on 30-day mortality from pooled patient-level data from studies of patients treated with carbapenems across a range of meropenem MICs. PubMed was searched to March 2019 with the terms 'carbapenem', 'meropenem', 'imipenem', 'doripenem', 'ertapenem', 'susceptibility' and 'outcomes'. Studies were included in the analysis if patients had Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia treated with a carbapenem for ≥48 h and mortality was reported. Studies were excluded if all isolates were either susceptible or resistant to meropenem based on CLSI 2010 breakpoints or if only carbapenemase-producing isolates were included. Authors were contacted for patient-level data. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, with planned subset analyses of patients treated with meropenem, receiving active combination therapy, treated in the ICU or infected with Klebsiella pneumoniae. Of 157 articles identified, 4 met the inclusion criteria (115 eligible patients). The odds of mortality increased with each increasing meropenem MIC dilution (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.06-2.15) as a continuous variable. A similar increase in odds was observed in patients treated with meropenem, treated in the ICU, infected with K. pneumoniae or receiving no other active antimicrobials. Increasing meropenem MICs in Enterobacteriaceae were associated with increased mortality; however, more work is needed to define optimal clinical decision rules for infections within the susceptible range.

Prevalence of a Cefazolin Inoculum Effect Associated with blaZ Gene Types among Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Four Major Medical Centers in Chicago.

The efficacy of cefazolin with high-inoculum methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections remains in question due to therapeutic failure inferred as being due to an inoculum effect (InE). This study investigated the local prevalence of a cefazolin InE (CInE) and its association with staphylococcal blaZ gene types among MSSA isolates in the Chicago area. Four medical centers in Chicago, IL, contributed MSSA isolates. Cefazolin MICs (C-MIC) were determined at 24 h by the broth microdilution method using a standard inoculum (SI; 5 × 105 CFU/ml) and a high inoculum (HI; 5 × 107 CFU/ml). The CInE was defined as (i) a ≥4-fold increase in C-MIC between SI and HI and/or (ii) a pronounced CInE, i.e., a nonsusceptible C-MIC of ≥16 µg/ml at HI. PCR was used to amplify the blaZ gene, followed by agarose gel electrophoresis and sequencing to determine the gene type. Approximately 269 MSSA isolates were included. All but one isolate were susceptible to cefazolin at SI, and 97% remained susceptible at HI. A total of 196 isolates (73%) were blaZ positive, with the blaZ types led by gene type C (40%). CInE was seen in 45 blaZ-positive isolates (23%), with 44 (22%) presenting a ≥4-fold increase in C-MIC (SI to HI) and 5 (3%) a pronounced CInE. Four of the five met both definitions of CInE, two of which expressed the type A gene. The prevalence of a pronounced CInE associated with the type A blaZ gene from MSSA isolates in Chicago is low. Our predilection for cefazolin use, even early in the management of hospitalized MSSA infections, is tenable.

Carbapenems vs. alternative ß-lactams for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenems have shown efficacy in treating nosocomial pneumonias in clinical trials despite a reported low lung penetration compared with other ß-lactams. Preserving the clinical activity of carbapenems through stewardship efforts is essential. The aim of this review was to identify any differences in outcomes potentially as a function of decreased penetration. METHODS: PubMed and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for clinical trials comparing carbapenems with other anti-pseudomonal ß-lactams for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia through to end December 2016. Trials reporting clinical and microbiological outcomes associated with treatment were included. Pediatric studies and those with uneven comparators (e.g., carbapenem vs. combination Gram-negative therapy) were excluded. Fixed effects models were used to evaluate the impact of treatment on the odds of clinical failure, death, or microbiological failure. RESULTS: 252 unique articles were identified; five met inclusion criteria and comprised 640 patients in the carbapenem group and 634 patients in the ß-lactam group. No differences in clinical failure (odds ratio [OR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.81-1.44], I2=16%) or mortality (OR 0.75, CI 0.57-1.11, I2=0%) were noted between groups. Patients infected with P. aeruginosa and treated with imipenem were more likely to experience clinical failure (OR 4.21, CI 1.51-11.12, I2=44%) and to develop resistance to the study carbapenem (OR 2.86, CI 1.08-6.44, I2= 13%) than those treated with alternative ß-lactams. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in clinical outcomes were observed between carbapenems and non-carbapenem ß-lactams in nosocomial pneumonias. Those infected with P. aeruginosa fared worse and were more likely to have resistance develop if they were treated with imipenem. Additional studies are warranted.

Visual and absorbance analyses of admixtures containing vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam at commonly used concentrations.

PURPOSE: The compatibility of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam in concentrations typically used in extended-infusion dosing schemes was evaluated. METHODS: Piperacillin-tazobactam was reconstituted and diluted to concentrations of 33.75, 45, 50, 60, 67.5, 80, and 90 mg/mL. Vancomycin was diluted to concentrations of 4-8, 10, and 12 mg/mL. The resultant admixtures were visually observed after preparation against black and white backgrounds each hour between hours 1 through 4 and after 24 hours. Frozen products of each medication and brand-name Zosyn powder for reconstitution also were studied. Each combination of products and concentrations was tested for precipitation using simulated Y-site administration. Absorbance and microscopic analyses were performed to discern less perceptible incompatibilities in combinations that did not result in visual precipitation. Changes in absorbance were evaluated using two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni corrections. RESULTS: No tested concentrations of piperacillin-tazobactam showed precipitations with vancomycin up to concentrations of 7 mg/mL. Piperacillin-tazobactam 80-90 mg/mL formed reversible precipitation with vancomycin 8 mg/mL. All tested concentrations of piperacillin-tazobactam formed a reversible precipitate with vancomycin 10 mg/mL. Irreversible precipitation was noted with all combinations of piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin 12 mg/mL. No significant changes in absorbance analyses were identified for all tested piperacillin-tazobactam concentrations and vancomycin 4-10 mg/mL compared with 0.9% sodium chloride injection (p > 0.05). Similar results were observed using frozen preparations and brand-name Zosyn. CONCLUSION: Visual, microscopic, and absorbance analyses showed no evidence of incompatibility when piperacillin-tazobactam 33.75-90 mg/mL was combined with vancomycin ≤7 mg/mL. Reversible and irreversible precipitates formed when piperacillin-tazobactam was combined with vancomycin ≥8 mg/mL.