Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Revista
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pain ; 22(5): 545-555, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33321196

RESUMO

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) has been associated with changes in brain plasticity. Nonpharmacological therapies such as Manual Therapy (MT) have shown promise for relieving cLBP. However, translational neuroimaging research is needed to understand potential central mechanisms supporting MT. We investigated the effect of MT on resting-state salience network (SLN) connectivity, and whether this was associated with changes in clinical pain. Fifteen cLBP patients, and 16 matched healthy controls (HC) were scanned with resting functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), before and immediately after a MT intervention (cross-over design with two separate visits, pseudorandomized, grades V 'Manipulation' and III 'Mobilization' of the Maitland Joint Mobilization Grading Scale). Patients rated clinical pain (0-100) pre- and post-therapy. SLN connectivity was assessed using dual regression probabilistic independent component analysis. Both manipulation (Pre: 39.43 ± 16.5, Post: 28.43 ± 16.5) and mobilization (Pre: 38.83 ± 17.7, Post: 31.76 ± 19.4) reduced clinical back pain (P < .05). Manipulation (but not mobilization) significantly increased SLN connectivity to thalamus and primary motor cortex. Additionally, a voxelwise regression indicated that greater MT-induced increase in SLN connectivity to the lateral prefrontal cortex was associated with greater clinical back pain reduction immediately after intervention, for both manipulation (r = -0.8) and mobilization (r = -0.54). Our results suggest that MT is successful in reducing clinical low back pain by both spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization. Furthermore, this reduction post-manipulation occurs via modulation of SLN connectivity to sensorimotor, affective, and cognitive processing regions. PERSPECTIVE: MT both reduces clinical low back pain and modulates brain activity important for the processing of pain. This modulation was shown by increased functional brain connectivity between the salience network and brain regions involved in cognitive, affective, and sensorimotor processing of pain.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Conectoma , Dor Lombar/terapia , Manipulação da Coluna , Córtex Motor/fisiopatologia , Rede Nervosa/fisiopatologia , Córtex Pré-Frontal/fisiopatologia , Tálamo/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor Crônica/fisiopatologia , Estudos Cross-Over , Humanos , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor Lombar/fisiopatologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Córtex Motor/diagnóstico por imagem , Rede Nervosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Córtex Pré-Frontal/diagnóstico por imagem , Tálamo/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
J Pain ; 19(11): 1352-1365, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30392530

RESUMO

Heightened anticipation and fear of movement-related pain has been linked to detrimental fear-avoidance behavior in chronic low back pain (cLBP). Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has been proposed to work partly by exposing patients to nonharmful but forceful mobilization of the painful joint, thereby disrupting the relationship among pain anticipation, fear, and movement. Here, we investigated the brain processes underpinning pain anticipation and fear of movement in cLBP, and their modulation by SMT, using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Fifteen cLBP patients and 16 healthy control (HC) subjects were scanned while observing and rating video clips depicting back-straining or neutral physical exercises, which they knew they would have to perform at the end of the visit. This task was repeated after a single session of spinal manipulation (cLBP and HC group) or mobilization (cLBP group only), in separate visits. Compared with HC subjects, cLBP patients reported higher expected pain and fear of performing the observed exercises. These ratings, along with clinical pain, were reduced by SMT. Moreover, cLBP, relative to HC subjects, demonstrated higher blood oxygen level-dependent signal in brain circuitry that has previously been implicated in salience, social cognition, and mentalizing, while observing back straining compared with neutral exercises. The engagement of this circuitry was reduced after SMT, and especially the spinal manipulation session, proportionally to the magnitude of SMT-induced reduction in anticipated pain and fear. This study sheds light on the brain processing of anticipated pain and fear of back-straining movement in cLBP, and suggests that SMT may reduce cognitive and affective-motivational aspects of fear-avoidance behavior, along with corresponding brain processes. PERSPECTIVE: This study of cLBP patients investigated how SMT affects clinical pain, expected pain, and fear of physical exercises. The results indicate that one of the mechanisms of SMT may be to reduce pain expectancy, fear of movement, and associated brain responses.


Assuntos
Antecipação Psicológica/fisiologia , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Dor Lombar/fisiopatologia , Dor Lombar/psicologia , Dor Lombar/terapia , Manipulações Musculoesqueléticas/métodos , Adulto , Dor Crônica/fisiopatologia , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Dor Crônica/terapia , Medo/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Manipulação da Coluna/métodos , Manipulação da Coluna/psicologia , Manipulações Musculoesqueléticas/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA