Quantitative analysis of contribution of mild and moderate hyperthermia to thermal ablation and sensitization of irreversible electroporation of pancreatic cancer cells.

INTRODUCTION: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablation modality that applies short, high-voltage electric pulses to unresectable cancers. Although considered a non-thermal technique, temperatures do increase during IRE. This temperature rise sensitizes tumor cells for electroporation as well as inducing partial direct thermal ablation. AIM: To evaluate the extent to which mild and moderate hyperthermia enhance electroporation effects, and to establish and validate in a pilot study cell viability models (CVM) as function of both electroporation parameters and temperature in a relevant pancreatic cancer cell line. METHODS: Several IRE-protocols were applied at different well-controlled temperature levels (37 °C ≤ T ≤ 46 °C) to evaluate temperature dependent cell viability at enhanced temperatures in comparison to cell viability at T = 37 °C. A realistic sigmoid CVM function was used based on thermal damage probability with Arrhenius Equation and cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (CEM43°C) as arguments, and fitted to the experimental data using "Non-linear-least-squares"-analysis. RESULTS: Mild (40 °C) and moderate (46 °C) hyperthermic temperatures boosted cell ablation with up to 30% and 95%, respectively, mainly around the IRE threshold Eth,50% electric-field strength that results in 50% cell viability. The CVM was successfully fitted to the experimental data. CONCLUSION: Both mild- and moderate hyperthermia significantly boost the electroporation effect at electric-field strengths neighboring Eth,50%. Inclusion of temperature in the newly developed CVM correctly predicted both temperature-dependent cell viability and thermal ablation for pancreatic cancer cells exposed to a relevant range of electric-field strengths/pulse parameters and mild moderate hyperthermic temperatures.

A scalable hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) setup for rat models of bladder cancer.

Hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC)-whereby the bladder is heated to ± 43 °C during a chemotherapy instillation-can improve outcomes of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treatments. Experiments in animal models are required to explore new hyperthermia based treatments. Existing HIVEC devices are not suitable for rodents or large-scale animal trials. We present a HIVEC setup compatible with orthotopic rat models. An externally heated chemotherapeutic solution is circulated in the bladder through a double-lumen catheter with flow rates controlled using a peristaltic pump. Temperature sensors in the inflow channel, bladder and outflow channel allow temperature monitoring and adjustments in real-time. At a constant flow rate of 2.5 mL/min the system rapidly reaches the desired bladder temperature of 42-43 °C with minimal variability throughout a one-hour treatment in a rat bladder phantom, as well as in euthanised and live rats. Mean intraluminal bladder temperatures were 42.92 °C (SD = 0.15 °C), 42.45 °C (SD = 0.37 °C) and 42.52 °C (SD = 0.09 °C) in the bladder phantom, euthanised, and live rats respectively. Thermal camera measurements showed homogenous heat distributions over the bladder wall. The setup provides well-controlled thermal dose and the upscaling needed for performing large scale HIVEC experiments in rats.

Molecular and biological rationale of hyperthermia as radio- and chemosensitizer.

Mild hyperthermia, local heating of the tumour up to temperatures <43 °C, has been clinically applied for almost four decades and has been proven to substantially enhance the effectiveness of both radiotherapy and chemotherapy in treatment of primary and recurrent tumours. Clinical results and mechanisms of action are discussed in this review, including the molecular and biological rationale of hyperthermia as radio- and chemosensitizer as established in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Proven mechanisms include inhibition of different DNA repair processes, (in)direct reduction of the hypoxic tumour cell fraction, enhanced drug uptake, increased perfusion and oxygen levels. All mechanisms show different dose effect relationships and different optimal scheduling with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Therefore, obtaining the ideal multi-modality treatment still requires elucidation of more detailed data on dose, sequence, duration, and possible synergisms between modalities. A multidisciplinary approach with different modalities including hyperthermia might further increase anti-tumour effects and diminish normal tissue damage.

The effect of time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia on planned equivalent radiation dose.

PURPOSE: Thermoradiotherapy is an effective treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the optimal time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia, resulting in the highest therapeutic gain, remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of time interval on the therapeutic gain using biological treatment planning. METHODS: Radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatment plans were created for 15 cervical cancer patients. Biological modeling was used to calculate the equivalent radiation dose, that is, the radiation dose that results in the same biological effect as the thermoradiotherapy treatment, for different time intervals ranging from 0-4 h. Subsequently, the thermal enhancement ratio (TER, i.e. the ratio of the dose for the thermoradiotherapy and the radiotherapy-only plan) was calculated for the gross tumor volume (GTV) and the organs at risk (OARs: bladder, rectum, bowel), for each time interval. Finally, the therapeutic gain factor (TGF, i.e. TERGTV/TEROAR) was calculated for each OAR. RESULTS: The median TERGTV ranged from 1.05 to 1.16 for 4 h and 0 h time interval, respectively. Similarly, for bladder, rectum and bowel, TEROARs ranged from 1-1.03, 1-1.04 and 1-1.03, respectively. Radiosensitization in the OARs was much less than in the GTV, because temperatures were lower, fractionation sensitivity was higher (lower α/ß) and direct cytotoxicity was assumed negligible in normal tissue. TGFs for the three OARs were similar, and were highest (around 1.12) at 0 h time interval. CONCLUSION: This planning study indicates that the largest therapeutic gain for thermoradiotherapy in cervical cancer patients can be obtained when hyperthermia is delivered immediately before or after radiotherapy.

Biological modelling of the radiation dose escalation effect of regional hyperthermia in cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy significantly improves locoregional control and overall survival for cervical tumors compared to radiotherapy alone. In this study biological modelling is applied to quantify the effect of radiosensitization for three cervical cancer patients to evaluate the improvement in equivalent dose for the combination treatment with radiotherapy and hyperthermia. METHODS: The Linear-Quadratic (LQ) model extended with temperature-dependent LQ-parameters α and ß was used to model radiosensitization by hyperthermia and to calculate the conventional radiation dose that is equivalent in biological effect to the combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatment. External beam radiotherapy planning was performed based on a prescription dose of 46Gy in 23 fractions of 2Gy. Hyperthermia treatment using the AMC-4 system was simulated based on the actual optimized system settings used during treatment. RESULTS: The simulated hyperthermia treatments for the 3 patients yielded a T50 of 40.1 °C, 40.5 °C, 41.1 °C and a T90 of 39.2 °C, 39.7 °C, 40.4 °C, respectively. The combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatment resulted in a D95 of 52.5Gy, 55.5Gy, 56.9Gy in the GTV, a dose escalation of 7.3-11.9Gy compared to radiotherapy alone (D95 = 45.0-45.5Gy). CONCLUSIONS: This study applied biological modelling to evaluate radiosensitization by hyperthermia as a radiation-dose escalation for cervical cancer patients. This model is very useful to compare the effectiveness of different treatment schedules for combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatments and to guide the design of clinical studies on dose escalation using hyperthermia in a multi-modality setting.