Blood transfusion requirements in cleft lip surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Cleft lip surgery is a common procedure performed by surgeons worldwide. The aim of the study was to determine blood transfusion requirements and factors influencing blood transfusion in cleft lip surgery. METHODS: Transfusion rate in 100 consecutive patients who had cleft lip surgery was prospectively evaluated at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Data collected included age and sex of patients, type of cleft defects, type of surgery done, preoperative haematocrit, duration of surgery, amount of blood loss during surgery, the number of units of blood cross-matched and those used. Cardiovascular parameters at the point of transfusion were also recorded. Each patient was made to donate a unit of homologous blood prior to surgery. RESULTS: Mean estimated blood loss during surgery was 26.5 ± 47.1 ml. Most patients (92%) lost between 2 and 50 ml of blood. Mean estimated blood loss in unilateral cleft lip surgery was not significantly differently from that of bilateral cleft lip surgery (P=0.46). Only five patients (5%) required blood transfusion. The mean blood transfused was 50.0 ± 16.9 ml. All the patients transfused had a preoperative haematocrit of <30% (23-27%). The cross-match-to-transfusion ratio for cleft surgery was 20. The transfusion index was 0.05 and overall blood-ordering quotient was 20. CONCLUSION: Cleft lip surgery is a low volume blood loss surgery. Homologous blood donation prior to cleft lip surgery in patients with preoperative haematocrit of 30% or more is not necessary. For patients with preoperative haematocrit of less than 30%, type and screen of donated blood should be adequate.

A comparative study of surgical morbidity associated with mandibular third-molar surgery in young and aging populations.

AIM: Prophylactic surgical extraction of impacted third molars is a common practice throughout the world justified on the presumption that the risk of surgical morbidity increases with increasing age, among other reasons. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare surgical morbidity associated with third-molar extractions in young and aging populations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A review of records for all patients who underwent the surgical extraction of impacted third molars between April 2001 and June 2006 at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 506 patients had surgical extractions of impacted third molars under local anaesthesia during the period of the study. Of these, 470 (92.9 percent) patients were below the age of 40 years (Group A) and 36 (7.1 percent) patients were 40 years of age and older (Group B). No incidences of severe intraoperative complications (excessive bleeding or mandibular fractures) were recorded in either group, but other postoperative complications were reported in 70 (13.8 percent) patients. Of these 70 patients, 65 (92.9 percent) were from Group A and 5 (7.1 percent) were from Group B, and their complications included infected socket, dry socket, paraesthesia, and buccal space abscess. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in post-operative complications following surgical removal of mandibular third molars was found between patients 40 years old and greater and those below age 40. Prophylactic surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars, based on the assumption that surgical morbidity increases with age, may not be justifiable. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Age does not predispose patients who had surgical extraction of mandibular third molars above 40 years of age to any additional surgical complications when compared to patients below the age of 40 years receiving comparable treatment.