Clinical T2N0 Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy plus Local Excision.

INTRODUCTION: Total mesorectal excision is the standard treatment for clinical T2 (cT2) rectal cancer; however, this procedure can result in postoperative dysfunction, decreased quality of life, and stoma creation in some patients. We investigated neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) plus local excision (LE) as an alternative treatment strategy for patients with cT2N0 rectal cancer. METHOD: Fifty-six patients with cT2N0M0 rectal cancer who exhibited the following characteristics (an anal verge of ≤8 cm, tumor size of <30 mm, well- or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma on biopsy) underwent LE following nCRT. Chemoradiotherapy was administered at 40 or 45 Gy in 20-25 fractions with concurrent oral UFT (tegafur/uracil; 400 mg/m2) or S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil; 80 mg/m2). RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (98%) completed nCRT as planned. Histologically, the excision margin was negative in all patients, and four patients with ypT3 disease underwent total mesorectal excision. Recurrence was observed in 15 patients (27%), local recurrence in 7 (13%), and distant recurrence in 10 (18%). The salvage surgery was possible for the local recurrence group. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 68.4% and 84.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that only the tumor regression grade (TRG) was an independent risk factor for recurrence (p = 0.025). Although 7 (26%) out of 27 patients with a TRG of 3 or 4 developed local recurrence and 6 (22%) had distant metastasis, 25 patients with a TRG of 1 or 2 did not exhibit local recurrence, and only 1 (4%) experienced distant metastasis. CONCLUSION: nCRT plus LE may be an alternative treatment for patients with cT2N0 rectal cancer who achieved a TRG of 1 or 2. However, additional treatment was required in patients who achieved a TRG of 3 or 4.

Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is characterized by more local recurrence (LR) and lung metastasis than colon cancer. However, the diagnosis of rectal cancer is not standardized as there is no global consensus on its definition and classification. The classification of rectal cancer differs between Japanese and Western guidelines. AIM: To clarify the characteristics of rectal cancer by comparing the tumor location and characteristics of rectal cancer with those of colon cancer according to each set of guidelines. METHODS: A total of 958 patients with Stage II and III colorectal cancer were included in the analysis: 607 with colon cancer and 351 with rectal cancer. Localization of rectal cancers was assessed by enema examination and rigid endoscopy. According to Japan guidelines, rectal cancer is classified as Rb (below the peritoneal inversion), Ra (between the inferior margin of second sacral vertebrae and Rb) or RS (between Ra and sacral promontory). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between RS rectal cancer and colon cancer in the rates of liver and lung metastasis or LR. Lung metastasis and LR were significantly more common among Rb rectal cancer (in Japan) than in colon cancer (P = 0.0043 and P = 0.0002, respectively). Lung metastases and LR occurred at significantly higher rates in rectal cancer measuring ≤ 12 cm and ≤ 10 cm than in colon cancers (P = 0.0117, P = 0.0467, P = 0.0036, P = 0.0010). Finally, the rates of liver metastasis, lung metastasis, and LR in rectal cancers measuring 11 cm to 15 cm were 6.9%, 2.8%, and 5.7%, respectively. These were equivalent to the rates in colon cancer. CONCLUSION: High rectal cancer may be treated with the same treatment strategies as colon cancer. There was no difference in the classification of colorectal cancer between Japan and Western countries.

Outcomes of Local Excision plus Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with T1 Rectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend local excision and observation as standard treatment for selected patients with clinical T1N0M0 rectal cancer. In patients with pathological T1 (pT1) rectal cancer who received local excision, the local recurrence rate is at least 10%. We studied oncological outcomes in patients with pT1 rectal cancer who received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after local excision. METHODS: Local excision was performed in 65 patients with clinical T1N0M0 rectal cancer (≤8 cm from the anal verge, tumor size < 30 mm, well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma). The patients received CRT (40 or 45 Gy in 1.8-2.0 fractions with concurrent oral UFT [tegafur/uracil] or S-1 [tegafur/gimeracil/ote-racil]) after confirmation of pT1 and negative margins. RESULTS: Patients who had pT2 cancer or who did not provide informed consent were excluded. The remaining 50 patients additionally received CRT. The CRT was completed in 48 patients (96%). The median follow-up period was 71 months. Local recurrence occurred in 1 patient (2%). Distant metastases occurred in 3 patients (6%). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 86%, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 92%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that multidisciplinary treatment with local excision plus CRT can be used as a treatment option in selected patients with clinical T1N0M0 rectal cancer.

A comparison of the localization of rectal carcinomas according to the general rules of the Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma (JCCRC) and Western guidelines.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the localization of rectal cancers as classified according to the general rules of the Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma (JCCRC) and also according to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, which are based on rigid endoscopic measurements. METHODS: The medical records of patients scheduled to receive curative surgery for histologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma during 2009-2015 were investigated (n = 230). Rigid proctoscopy was performed in patients with rectal cancer located in the upper (Ra) or lower (Rb) division using double-contrast barium enema. RESULTS: The median values of height from the anal verge were 7.5 cm (range 2-12) and 3 cm (0-9.5) on rigid proctoscopy for cancers assigned as Ra and Rb, respectively. All 159 cancers at Ra or Rb were located within 12 cm from the anal verge by rigid proctoscopy, while only 79.7% of Ra or 82.1% of Rb cancers were located in the mid (5.1-10 cm) or low (≤5 cm) rectum, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ra and Rb cancers are deemed to be rectal cancers according to NCCN guidelines, but these classifications are not interchangeable with mid- and low-rectal cancers, respectively, according to the ESMO guidelines.

[Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer--Drug Selection, Tolerability, and Safety in Clinical Practice].

In the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, oxaliplatin (L-OHP)-based chemotherapeutic regimens, including 5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin (LV), and L-OHP (FOLFOX); capecitabine and L-OHP (CapeOX); and 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and L-OHP (FLOX) are designated as category 1 recommendations for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage III colon cancer, followed by capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil plus LV as category 2A recommendations. We studied the selection of drugs for adjuvant chemotherapy and assessed the tolerability and safety of CapeOX and tegafur-uracil (UFT) plus LV (UFT/LV) in patients with Stage III colon cancer. The study group included 104 consecutive patients with Stage III colon cancer who underwent curative surgery. One patient changed hospitals immediately after surgery. Among the remaining 103 patients, 82 (80%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and 21 (20%) did not. CapeOX was administered to 32 patients (31%), UFT/LV to 49 patients (48%), and capecitabine to 1 patient (1%). In 59 patients, the treatment choice was determined according to the patient's preference; 32 patients (54%) selected CapeOX, 26 (44%) selected UFT/LV, and 1 (2%) selected no chemotherapy. The treatment completion rate was 80% for CapeOX and 84% for UFT/LV. Among patients who completed chemotherapy, dose reduction and drug withdrawal were not required in 22% of patients who received CapeOX and 80% of those who received UFT/LV. Neither CapeOX nor UFT/LV was associated with any serious adverse events. The tolerability and safety of CapeOX and UFT/LV were acceptable. However, CapeOX dose had to be carefully adjusted according to each patient's condition.

Relationship between histologic response and the degree of tumor shrinkage after chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) significantly decreases local recurrence in advanced rectal cancer. We studied whether the degree of tumor shrinkage can be used as a predictor of histologic response. METHODS: The subjects were 114 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision after receiving radiotherapy combined with uracil/tegafur (UFT) or S-1. The degree of tumor shrinkage based on barium enema examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were assessed before CRT and immediately before surgery. RESULTS: A histologic complete response (ypCR), histologic marked regression, T and N downstaging were associated with significantly higher tumor-shrinkage rates on barium enema (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively) as well as on MRI (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.01, and P = 0.01, respectively). On multivariate analysis, ypCR and histologic marked regression were significantly related only to tumor-shrinkage rates on barium enema (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and were not related to tumor-shrinkage rates on MRI. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of tumor shrinkage is closely related to the final histologic response. Two-dimensionally evaluated tumor-shrinkage rates based on barium enema are adequate for the prediction of histologic response.

Biopsy specimens obtained 7 days after starting chemoradiotherapy (CRT) provide reliable predictors of response to CRT for rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) significantly decreases local recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer. Various biomarkers in biopsy specimens obtained before CRT have been proposed as predictors of response. However, reliable biomarkers remain to be established. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study group comprised 101 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received preoperative CRT with oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) or S-1. We evaluated histologic findings on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical expressions of Ki67, p53, p21, and apoptosis in biopsy specimens obtained before CRT and 7 days after starting CRT. These findings were contrasted with the histologic response and the degree of tumor shrinkage. RESULTS: In biopsy specimens obtained before CRT, histologic marked regression according to the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma (JCCC) criteria and the degree of tumor shrinkage on barium enema examination (BE) were significantly greater in patients with p21-positive tumors than in those with p21-negative tumors (P=.04 and P<.01, respectively). In biopsy specimens obtained 7 days after starting CRT, pathologic complete response, histologic marked regression according to both the tumor regression criteria and JCCC criteria, and T downstaging were significantly greater in patients with apoptosis-positive and p21-positive tumors than in those with apoptosis-negative (P<.01, P=.02, P=.01, and P<.01, respectively) or p21-negative tumors (P=.03, P<.01, P<.01, and P=.02, respectively). The degree of tumor shrinkage on both BE as well as MRI was significantly greater in patients with apoptosis-positive and with p21-positive tumors than in those with apoptosis-negative or p21-negative tumors, respectively. Histologic changes in H&E-stained biopsy specimens 7 days after starting CRT significantly correlated with pathologic complete response and marked regression on both JCCC and tumor regression criteria, as well as with tumor shrinkage on BE and MRI (P<.01, P<.01, P<.01, P<.01, and P=.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Immunohistochemical expressions of p21 and apoptosis together with histologic changes on H&E-stained biopsy specimens obtained 7 days after starting CRT are strong predictors of the response to CRT.

Clinical significance of and future perspectives for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

The most common site of metastases in patients with colorectal cancer is the liver. Hepatic resection is considered to be the treatment of choice for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer; however, hepatic resection can be performed in only 20 or 25% of all patients. Recurrence develops in the remnant liver or other organs after hepatic resection in over half of all patients with liver-only metastasis. Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy can provide relatively high concentrations of drugs to microscopic or macroscopic metastases in the liver, with less toxicity than systemic administration. Meta-analyses have shown HAI chemotherapy to have a significantly higher response rate than systemic chemotherapy and its effect on extrahepatic metastases is negligible. HAI chemotherapy provides much better local control of liver metastases from colorectal cancer than systemic chemotherapy. However, well-controlled studies are needed to elucidate the optimal treatment strategies for neoadjuvant and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy that optimally combine HAI chemotherapy, molecular targeted agents, and systemic chemotherapy such as FOLFOX or FOLFIRI.

Efficacy of 5-FU/LV plus CPT-11 as first-line adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIIa colorectal cancer.

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the effect of adding CPT-11 to postoperative chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer. The subjects were 94 patients, including 60 in stage IIIa (or=4 positive nodes), who underwent curative resection. The clinical outcome was compared between patients receiving 5-FU/LV plus CPT-11 (FLC group) and patients receiving 5-FU/LV alone (FL group). The FLC group (54 patients) had a 3-year relapse-free survival (3Y-RFS) of 68.7%, a 5Y-RFS of 68.7% and a 5Y-OS of 67.1%, while the FL group (40 patients) had a 3Y-RFS of 67.5% (n.s.), a 5Y-RFS of 64.9% (n.s.), and a 5Y-OS of 77.3% (n.s.). There were no significant differences of these parameters between the two groups. For stage IIIa patients, the corresponding survival rates were 92.4, 92.4 and 90.9% in the FLC group (29 patients) vs. 64.5% (p=0.024), 61.1% (p=0.018), and 77.1% (n.s.) in the FL group (31 patients). For stage IIIb patients, the rates were 36.6, 36.6 and 24.8% in the FLC group (25 patients) vs. 77.8% (n.s.), 77.8% (n.s.), and 77.8% (n.s.) in the FL group (9 patients). These results suggest that the 3Y-RFS and 5Y-RFS of patients with stage IIIa colorectal cancer were significantly improved by adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU/LV plus CPT-11.