Pharmacokinetic basis for dosing high-dose methotrexate in infants and young children with malignant brain tumours.

AIMS: No population pharmacokinetic studies of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) have been conducted in infants with brain tumours, which are a vulnerable population. The aim of this study was to evaluate HDMTX disposition in these children to provide a rational basis for MTX dosing. METHODS: Patients received 4 monthly courses of HDMTX (5 g/m2 or 2.5 g/m2 for infants aged ≤31 days) as a 24-h infusion. Serial samples were analysed for MTX by an enzyme immunoassay method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using nonlinear mixed effects population modelling. Demographics, concomitant medications and genetic polymorphisms were considered as pharmacokinetic covariates while MTX exposure and patient age were considered as covariates for Grade 3 and 4 toxicities. RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetics of HDMTX were estimated in 178 patients (age range 0.02-4.7 years) in 648 courses. The population clearance and volume were 90 mL/min/m2 and 14.4 L/m2 , respectively. Significant covariates on body surface area adjusted MTX clearance included estimated glomerular filtration rate and co-treatment with dexamethasone or vancomycin. No significant association was observed between MTX toxicity and MTX exposure, patient age, leucovorin dosage or duration. MTX clearance in infants ≤31 days at enrolment was 44% lower than in older infants, but their incidence of toxicity was not higher since they also received a lower MTX dosage. CONCLUSIONS: By aggressively following institutional clinical guidelines, HDMTX-related toxicities were low, and using covariates from the population pharmacokinetic model enabled the calculation of a rational dosage for this patient population for future clinical trials.

Establishing a Preclinical Multidisciplinary Board for Brain Tumors.

Purpose: Curing all children with brain tumors will require an understanding of how each subtype responds to conventional treatments and how best to combine existing and novel therapies. It is extremely challenging to acquire this knowledge in the clinic alone, especially among patients with rare tumors. Therefore, we developed a preclinical brain tumor platform to test combinations of conventional and novel therapies in a manner that closely recapitulates clinic trials.Experimental Design: A multidisciplinary team was established to design and conduct neurosurgical, fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy studies, alone or in combination, in accurate mouse models of supratentorial ependymoma (SEP) subtypes and choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC). Extensive drug repurposing screens, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy studies were used to triage active compounds for combination preclinical trials with "standard-of-care" surgery and radiotherapy.Results: Mouse models displayed distinct patterns of response to surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy that varied with tumor subtype. Repurposing screens identified 3-hour infusions of gemcitabine as a relatively nontoxic and efficacious treatment of SEP and CPC. Combination neurosurgery, fractionated irradiation, and gemcitabine proved significantly more effective than surgery and irradiation alone, curing one half of all animals with aggressive forms of SEP.Conclusions: We report a comprehensive preclinical trial platform to assess the therapeutic activity of conventional and novel treatments among rare brain tumor subtypes. It also enables the development of complex, combination treatment regimens that should deliver optimal trial designs for clinical testing. Postirradiation gemcitabine infusion should be tested as new treatments of SEP and CPC. Clin Cancer Res; 24(7); 1654-66. ©2018 AACR.

Delayed methotrexate excretion in infants and young children with primary central nervous system tumors and postoperative fluid collections.

PURPOSE: High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) has been used to treat children with central nervous system tumors. Accumulation of MTX within pleural, peritoneal, or cardiac effusions has led to delayed excretion and increased risk of systemic toxicity. This retrospective study analyzed the association of intracranial post-resection fluid collections with MTX plasma disposition in infants and young children with brain tumors. METHODS: Brain MRI findings were analyzed for postoperative intracranial fluid collections in 75 pediatric patients treated with HD-MTX and for whom serial MTX plasma concentrations (MTX) were collected. Delayed plasma excretion was defined as (MTX) ≥1 µM at 42 hours (h). Leucovorin was administered at 42 h and then every 6 h until (MTX) <0.1 µM. Population and individual MTX pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients had intracranial fluid collections present. Population average (inter-individual variation) MTX clearance was 96.0 ml/min/m² (41.1 CV %) and increased with age. Of the patients with intracranial fluid collections, 24 had delayed excretion; only 2 of the 17 without fluid collections (P < 0.04) had delayed excretion. Eleven patients had grade 3 or 4 toxicities attributed to HD-MTX. No significant difference was observed in intracranial fluid collection, total leucovorin dosing, or hydration fluids between those with and without toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Although an intracranial fluid collection is associated with delayed MTX excretion, HD-MTX can be safely administered with monitoring of infants and young children with intracranial fluid collections. Infants younger than 1 year may need additional monitoring to avoid toxicity.

A simulation-based comparison of the traditional method, Rolling-6 design and a frequentist version of the continual reassessment method with special attention to trial duration in pediatric Phase I oncology trials.

The traditional method (TM), also known as the 3+3 up-and-down design, and the continual reassessment method (CRM) are commonly used in Phase I oncology trials to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The rolling-6 is a relative newcomer which was developed to shorten trial duration by minimizing the period of time during which the trial is closed to accrual for toxicity assessment. In this manuscript we have compared the performance of these three approaches via simulations not only with respect to the usual parameters such as overall toxicity, sample size and percentage of patients treated at doses above the MTD but also in terms of trial duration and the dose chosen as the MTD. Our results indicate that the toxicity rates are comparable across the three designs, but the TM and the rolling-6 tend to treat a higher percentage of patients at doses below the MTD. With respect to trial duration, rolling-6 leads to shorter trials compared to the TM but not compared to the CRM. Additionally, the doses identified as the MTD by the TM and the rolling-6 differ in a large percentage of trials. Our results also indicate that the body surface area-based dosing used in pediatric trials can make a difference in dose escalation/de-escalation patterns in the CRM compared to the cases where such variations are not taken into account in the calculations, even leading to different MTDs in some cases.