Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Oncologist ; 26(5): e780-e793, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33543577

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Rectal Cancer Guideline Panel recommends American Joint Committee of Cancer and College of American Pathologists (AJCC/CAP) tumor regression grading (TRG) system to evaluate pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Yet, the clinical significance of the AJCC/CAP TRG system has not been fully defined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospectively recruited, and prospectively maintained cohort study. Patients with LARC from one institution formed the discovery set, and cases from external independent institutions formed a validation set to verify the findings from discovery set. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox regression model. RESULTS: The discovery set (940 cases) found, and the validation set (2,156 cases) further confirmed, that inferior AJCC/CAP TRG categories were closely /ccorrelated with unfavorable survival (OS, DFS, LRFS, and DMFS) and higher risk of disease progression (death, accumulative relapse, local recurrence, and distant metastasis) (all p < .05). Significantly, pairwise comparison revealed that any two of four TRG categories had the distinguished survival and risk of disease progression. After propensity score matching, AJCC/CAP TRG0 category (pathological complete response) patients treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy displayed similar survival of OS, DFS, LRFS, and DMFS (all p > .05). For AJCC/CAP TRG1-3 cases, adjuvant chemotherapy treatment significantly improved 3-year OS (90.2% vs. 84.6%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated the AJCC/CAP TRG system was an independent prognostic surrogate. CONCLUSION: AJCC/CAP TRG system, an accurate prognostic surrogate, appears ideal for further strategizing adjuvant chemotherapy for LARC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends the American Joint Committee of Cancer and College of American Pathologists (AJCC/CAP) tumor regression grading (TRG) four-category system to evaluate the pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer; however, the clinical significance of the AJCC/CAP TRG system has not yet been clearly addressed. This study found, for the first time, that any two of four AJCC/CAP TRG categories had the distinguished long-term survival outcome. Importantly, adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the 3-year overall survival for AJCC/CAP TRG1-3 category patients but not for AJCC/CAP TRG0 category patients. Thus, AJCC/CAP TRG system, an accurate surrogate of long-term survival outcome, is useful in guiding adjuvant chemotherapy management for rectal cancer.


Assuntos
Patologistas , Neoplasias Retais , Quimiorradioterapia , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
2.
Surg Endosc ; 28(8): 2277-301, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24609699

RESUMO

Fecal incontinence is a frequent and debilitating condition that may result from a multitude of different causes. Treatment is often challenging and needs to be individualized. During the last several years, new technologies have been developed, and others are emerging from clinical trials to commercialization. Although their specific roles in the management of fecal incontinence have not yet been completely defined, surgeons have access to them and patients may request them. The purpose of this project is to put into perspective, for both the patient and the practitioner, the relative positions of new and emerging technologies in order to propose a treatment algorithm.


Assuntos
Incontinência Fecal/terapia , Canal Anal/inervação , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Órgãos Artificiais , Ablação por Cateter , Descompressão Cirúrgica , Dextranos/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Nervo Femoral/cirurgia , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Injeções , Plexo Lombossacral , Imãs , Microesferas , Síndromes de Compressão Nervosa/cirurgia , Transferência de Nervo , Nervo Pudendo/cirurgia , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Telas Cirúrgicas , Nervo Tibial
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA