Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye ; 41(5): 448-451, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29807771

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluates analgesic effectiveness of 0.1% nepafenac during cataract surgery. METHODS: This prospective randomized randomized double-masked, placebo-controlled study comprised 80 eyes of 40 consecutive patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of foldable intraocular lens with topical anesthesia with and without topical nepafenac drops. Each eye of patients was assigned to group 1 and group 2. Topical anesthesia combined with 0.1% nepafenac used three times a day the day before the surgery and once half an hour just before the surgery was group 1, consisting of 40 eyes, and topical anesthesia with using placebo was group 2 consisting of 40 eyes. Patients were asked to score their pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) and verbal pain scale (VPS) immediately following the surgery. When the patient moved or squeeze the eye during surgery, the surgical comfort was evaluated as bad and otherwise, it was evaluated as good. RESULTS: When the intensity of pain during the surgery was evaluated, the percentage of patients reporting mild or no pain in group 1 was %825 and in group 2 was %45. Mean VAS pain score and mean VPS pain score in group 1 was significantly lower than that in group 2(p = 0.024, p < 0.001). Surgical comfort in group 1 was %825 and in group 2%65(P = 0.075). CONCLUSION: 0.1% nepafenac reduces pain of patients who undergone routine clear corneal phacoemulsification with topical anesthesia and may increase patient comfort during the surgery when used preoperatively.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/métodos , Benzenoacetamidas/administração & dosagem , Extração de Catarata/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Satisfação do Paciente , Fenilacetatos/administração & dosagem , Administração Tópica , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20132013 Jun 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23771968

RESUMO

A 39-year-old man was admitted with a sudden visual loss in the left eye. Visual acuities were 10/10 on the right and 1/10 on the left. Fundus examination did not show any abnormalities. Visual acuity improved to 10/10 and visual field defect regressed in the following 2 weeks. Three years later, the patient returned with acute visual loss in the right eye. Visual acuities were 2/10 on the right and 10/10 on the left. Right optic disc had blurred margins with mild oedema. The tests revealed methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase A1298C mutation with positive lupus anticoagulant and hyperhomocysteinaemia. Enoxaparin was initialised with vitamin B12 supplementation. Complete visual recovery occurred in the following 3 weeks in both eyes. Thrombophilic screening seems to be important in the treatment and prevention of an attack in the second eye of patients with non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy.


Assuntos
Doenças do Nervo Óptico/diagnóstico , Trombofilia/complicações , Vitamina B 12/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças do Nervo Óptico/complicações , Doenças do Nervo Óptico/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Nervo Óptico/fisiopatologia , Acuidade Visual
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA