Factors affecting R0 resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases: a multicenter prospective observational study by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, R0 resection has been recommended for colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases confined to the adjacent peritoneum and those with a few metastases to the distant peritoneum. R0 resection for M1c disease has drawn attention in Western countries and is currently considered an acceptable therapeutic option in the US National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. However, clinical factors that affect the choice of R0 resection are unknown. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Colorectal cancer patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases were enrolled at 28 institutions in Japan from October 2012 to December 2016. To determine factors affecting R0 resection and R1 resection with intended R0 resection, stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed on clinical factors including age, sex, performance status (PS), body mass index, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score, presence of ascites, presence of distant metastases, and primary tumor site. RESULTS: R0/R1 resection was performed in 36 (31/5; 25%) of 146 patients. No distant metastases [odds ratio (OR) 52.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.3-210.1; p < 0.0001], low PCI score (1-6) (OR 20.0; 95% CI 4.8-83.4; p < 0.0001), and high PS (0) (OR 2.40; 95% CI 0.66-8.68; p = 0.18) were independent factors affecting R0/R1 resection. PCI score and PS were also independent factors affecting R0/R1 resection in M1c patients without non-peritoneal distant metastases (n = 59). CONCLUSION: Distant metastases, PCI score, and PS are three factors which affect R0 resection for M1c disease.

Diminishing impact of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in prognosis of Dukes' C colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In curable colorectal cancer (CRC), preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (preCEA) has been reported to have predictive prognostic value. However, data remains insufficient to support its clinical use. The aim of the current study was to validate the prognostic impact of preCEA in Dukes' C CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prognostic significance of preCEA for 237 Dukes' C CRC patients assessed retrospectively (between 1990 and 2000: previous cases) and the prospective relevance for 197 counterparts (between 2001 and 2004: recent cases) according to preCEA, were both examined. RESULTS: The previous cases showed the most potent impact of preCEA as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio=2.0, p=0.003) among the clinicopathological factors using a multivariate proportional hazard model, while the recent cases did not even show a univariate prognostic impact. A significant difference in the prognosis between the two periods was only found in the patients with elevated preCEA administered adjuvant chemotherapy (ADT) (p=0.03). Between the two terms, a dramatic change of ADT regimens from 5FU alone (p<0.001) to 5FU in combination with leucovorin (p<0.001) and/or irinotecan (p-0.0009/0.005) was introduced, and N2 patient survival was dramatically improved. However, a significant prognostic difference for the elevated preCEA patients with ADT could not be demonstrated by sub-analysis of N1 and N2 disease due to diminished correlation of preCEA and the N factor (p=0.02 to 0.5), indicating that preCEA did not predict chemosensitivity. CONCLUSION: The preCEA is no longer useful in predicting prognosis with Dukes' C CRC patients, because of the loss of preCEA association with the N factor, putatively through undefined diagnostic or therapeutic advancement.

[Outpatient chemotherapy of an advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer].

We report the outpatient chemotherapy of an advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. From April 2005 to May 2006, 50 patients were treated with FOLFIRI or FOLFOX in our hospital. Forty five patients (90%) had an intravenous catheter and a port for the chemotherapy, 23 patients (46%) were treated at the outpatient booths. We used the clinical pathway in chemotherapy for patients and co-medical roles. We were not experiencing emergency admission of side effects. Outpatient chemotherapy utilizing FOLFIRI or FOLFOX for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer can be enforced safely by using the clinical pathway.