Prospective randomized 1-year follow-up comparison of bilateral subthalamotomy versus bilateral subthalamic stimulation and the combination of both in Parkinson's disease patients: a pilot study.

It has been suggested that potential risk of hemiballismus after subthalamotomy makes DBS preferable to ablation for IPD treatment; however, cost and the need for regular electrode control have also been observed as disadvantages to stimulation. The objective was to compare efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches to STN, in a prospective randomized pilot study. Sixteen consecutive IPD patients randomized to receive either: bilateral STN-DBS, bilateral subthalamotomy or unilateral subthalamotomy plus contralateral STN-DBS implantation, and followed for 12 months after surgery. One patient died and was excluded from the analysis. Total and motor UPDRS scores, as well as drug-induced dyskinesias improved significantly at 1 year follow-up, regardless of the procedure administered and without statistically significant differences between treatment modalities. Discrete changes were observed on ACE and MMSE scores. Psychiatric examination of patients subjected to bilateral stimulation and lesion, revealed slight increment in apathy and irritability scores, coinciding with significant deterioration of mentation, behaviour and mood as measured using the UPDRS. One patient presented persistent hemiballismus and required ulterior posteroventral pallidotomy. In this small group of patients, overall motor performance significantly improved after all three procedures, without major differences in outcome. Adverse events were, nevertheless, observed after both ablation and stimulation. The role of bilateral subthalamotomy in patients unable to receive a DBS electrode-implant merits further exploration in a larger series of patients with longer follow-up.

Dyskinesias induced by subthalamotomy in Parkinson's disease are unresponsive to amantadine.

BACKGROUND: Dyskinesias are a transient but severe complication of subthalamotomy in some patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing bilateral micro-recording guided surgery of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) are described; deep brain stimulation (DBS) was used in one case, and subthalamotomy in the other two. Prior to surgery, levodopa induced dyskinesia had improved (< or = 50%) under treatment with amantadine (400 mg/day, po) in all three patients. The patient treated with DBS developed severe dyskinesia a few days after discharge and began self medication with amantadine but showed no improvement. This suggested a possible lack of response to amantadine for treatment of dyskinesias induced by surgery of the STN. RESULTS: Both patients treated with bilateral subthalamotomy developed unilateral choreoballistic movements immediately after surgery, despite not taking levodopa (L-dopa). Patients were scored using the dyskinesia scale and started treatment with 400 mg amantadine (po) for 4 days within the first postoperative week with no effect on dyskinesia score or its phenomenology. Amantadine was therefore discontinued. One month after surgery both patients were free of involuntary movements with an improvement of about 60% in the "off" state UPDRS motor score. Six month follow up showed maintained antiparkinsonian benefit, without need for levodopa treatment and complete absence of dyskinesia. CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that: (i) amantadine probably exerts its anti-dyskinetic effect by acting on the "indirect" pathway; (ii) the pathophysiological mechanisms of subthalamotomy induced dyskinesias may differ from those involved in L-dopa induced dyskinesias; (iii) dyskinesias induced by STN surgery resolve spontaneously as compensatory mechanisms develop.