[Unmittelbare Remission eines mit großzelligem B-Non-Hodgkin-Lymphom befallenen inguinalen Lymphknotens unter alleiniger homöopathischer Behandlung mit Conium: Wann ist eine alleinige adjuvant-homöopathische Tumortherapie zulässig und sinnvoll?] / Immediate Remission of an Inguinal Lymph Node Afflicted with Large-Cell B-Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Under Sole Homeopathic Treatment with Conium: When Is a Sole Adjuvant-Homeopathic Tumor Therapy Permissible and Useful?

Bei einer 63-jährigen Patientin wird mittels Biopsie eines linksinguinalen Lymphknotens ein großzelliges B-Non-Hodgkin-Lymphom diagnostiziert. Unmittelbar nach Beginn einer homöopathischen Therapie mit Conium C 30 beginnt sich der Lymphknoten in der linken Leiste zurückzubilden. Bei Exzision des Lymphknotens vierzehn Tage nach Therapiebeginn können histologisch keine Residuen des Tumors mehr nachgewiesen werden und es darf von einer vollständigen Remission ausgegangen werden. Die Patientin bleibt in der Folge rezidivfrei. Das homöopathische Mittel Conium (Schierling) kommt in der adjuvanten homöopathischen Tumortherapie und bei vergrößerten Lymphknoten als häufig indiziertes Mittel zur Anwendung.A large-cell B-cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (LCBCL) was diagnosed bioptically in a female patient (age 63 years) in one left inguinal lymph node. Immediately after beginning homeopathic treatment with Conium C 30, the lymph node started to show a reduction in size. Two weeks after starting homeopathic therapy, histological examination of the excised lymph node showed no evidence of a residual tumor ­ suggestive of a complete remission. The patient remains disease free until now. The homeopathic remedy Conium (hemlock) is frequently applied for adjuvant homeopathic tumor therapy as well as for the treatment of enlarged lymph nodes.

An increase in cell number at completion of therapy may develop as an indicator of early relapse: quantification of circulating epithelial tumor cells (CETC) for monitoring of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Treatment efficiency of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer is only revealed after several years by statistical evaluation and gives no answer for the individual patient. We here present a method to analyze the response to adjuvant chemotherapy online in individual patients. METHODS/RESULTS: In 25 consecutive non-metastatic primary breast cancer patients adjuvant fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamid (FEC) or EC followed by taxane (EC-T) or cyclophosphamid/methotrexate/fluorouracil (CMF) therapy were given. Circulating epithelial tumor cells (CETC) were quantified before and after each second cycle of the therapy regimen, between the anthracycline and the taxane block of the regimen and in some cases repeatedly during CMF treatment. Independent of the initial cell number CETC numbers showed a decline, no change or a minor increase in 15 patients of which 14 remained in complete remission and 1 suffered local relapse. Ten patients showed an increase at the end of therapy of which 4 have relapsed during the observation time of between 2 months and up to 54 months. This patient group was compared to a previously published group of 25 patients who have all reached a follow-up of 4.5 years or until relapse. CONCLUSION: As in the previous report, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a high correlation between the response of CETC to therapy and relapse (p < 0.0001) and curves of both patient groups were super imposable. Multivariate analysis revealed the response of CETC to therapy to be an independent predictive marker for relapse.