IL-36R ligands are potent regulators of dendritic and T cells.

IL-36α (IL-1F6), IL-36ß (IL-1F8), and IL-36γ (IL-1F9) are members of the IL-1 family of cytokines. These cytokines bind to IL-36R (IL-1Rrp2) and IL-1RAcP, activating similar intracellular signals as IL-1, whereas IL-36Ra (IL-1F5) acts as an IL-36R antagonist (IL-36Ra). In this study, we show that both murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) and CD4(+) T lymphocytes constitutively express IL-36R and respond to IL-36α, IL-36ß, and IL-36γ. IL-36 induced the production of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-12, IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-23 by BMDCs with a more potent stimulatory effect than that of other IL-1 cytokines. In addition, IL-36ß enhanced the expression of CD80, CD86, and MHC class II by BMDCs. IL-36 also induced the production of IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-17 by CD4(+) T cells and cultured splenocytes. These stimulatory effects were antagonized by IL-36Ra when used in 100- to 1000-fold molar excess. The immunization of mice with IL-36ß significantly and specifically promoted Th1 responses. Our data thus indicate a critical role of IL-36R ligands in the interface between innate and adaptive immunity, leading to the stimulation of T helper responses.

Magnetically retainable microparticles for drug delivery to the joint: efficacy studies in an antigen-induced arthritis model in mice.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional corticosteroid suspensions for the intra-articular treatment of arthritis suffer from limitations such as crystal formation or rapid clearance from the joint. The purpose of this study was to investigate an innovative alternative consisting of corticosteroid encapsulation into magnetically retainable microparticles. METHODS: Microparticles (1 or 10 microm) containing both superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) and dexamethasone 21-acetate (DXM) were prepared. In a preliminary study, we compared the persistence of microparticles of both sizes in the joint. A second study evaluated the influence of a subcutaneously implanted magnet near the knee on the retention of magnetic microparticles in the joint by in vivo imaging. Finally, the efficacy of 10-microm microparticles was investigated using a model of antigen-induced arthritis (AIA) in mice. Phosphate-buffered saline, DXM suspension, SPION suspension, blank microparticles and microparticles containing only SPIONs were used as controls. Arthritis severity was assessed using 99mTc accumulation and histological scoring. RESULTS: Due to their capacity of encapsulating more corticosteroid and their increased joint retention, the 10-microm microparticles were more suitable vectors than the 1-microm microparticles for corticosteroid delivery to the joint. The presence of a magnet resulted in higher magnetic retention in the joint, as demonstrated by a higher fluorescence signal. The therapeutic efficacy in AIA of 10-microm microparticles containing DXM and SPIONs was similar to that of the DXM suspension, proving that the bioactive agent is released. Moreover, the anti-inflammatory effect of DXM-containing microparticles was more important than that of blank microparticles or microparticles containing only SPIONs. The presence of a magnet did not induce a greater inflammatory reaction. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the effectiveness of an innovative approach of using magnetically retainable microparticles as intra-articular drug delivery systems. A major advantage comes from a versatile polymer matrix, which allows the encapsulation of many classes of therapeutic agents (for example, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors), which may reduce systemic side effects.

Assessment of the efficacy of different statins in murine collagen-induced arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are widely used lipid-lowering agents. In addition to their well-known effect on cholesterol levels, statins have been reported to display antiinflammatory activities both in vitro and in vivo. In this context, in vivo prophylactic and therapeutic effects of simvastatin were recently demonstrated in mouse collagen-induced arthritis, a well-described experimental model for human rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to further investigate in vivo effects of 3 different statins, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin, using the same experimental model. METHODS: Different doses and routes of administration were used for the various statins in an attempt to elicit antiarthritic activity in preventive and curative treatment protocols. RESULTS: Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin had no in vivo efficacy, as indicated by clinical, histologic (synovial hyperplasia, exudate, and cartilage damage), immunologic (anti-type II collagen IgG production), and biochemical (interleukin-6, serum amyloid A, and glucocorticoid production) parameters of inflammation and autoimmunity. The previously described beneficial effects of administration of intraperitoneal simvastatin were reproduced in our experiments, but could be accounted for by very severe side effects of the treatment, leading to increased glucocorticoid levels. CONCLUSION: This work shows that different statins have no effect in a murine model of arthritis, an unexpected observation given the previously described therapeutic effect of statins in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. It is still unclear whether statins will have benefit in the treatment of RA.