EORTC consensus recommendations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome - Update 2023.

On behalf of the EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Tumours Group (EORTC-CLTG) and following up on earlier versions published in 2006 and 2017 this document provides an updated standard for the treatment of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome (MF/SS). It considers recent relevant publications and treatment options introduced into clinical practice after 2017. Consensus was established among the authors through a series of consecutive consultations in writing and a round of discussion. Treatment options are assigned to each disease stage and, whenever possible and clinically useful, separated into first- and second line options annotated with levels of evidence. Major changes to the previous version include the incorporation of chlormethine, brentuximab vedotin, and mogamulizumab, recommendations on the use of pegylated interferon α (after withdrawal of recombinant unpegylated interferons), and the addition of paragraphs on supportive therapy and on the care of older patients. Still, skin-directed therapies are the most appropriate option for early-stage MF and most patients have a normal life expectancy but may suffer morbidity and impaired quality of life. In advanced disease treatment options have expanded recently. Most patients receive multiple consecutive therapies with treatments often having a relatively short duration of response. For those patients prognosis is still poor and only for a highly selected subset long term remission can be achieved with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Understanding of the disease, its epidemiology and clinical course, and its most appropriate management are gradually advancing, and there is well-founded hope that this will lead to further improvements in the care of patients with MF/SS.

Novel therapeutic approaches for cutaneous T cell lymphomas.

Introduction: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a rare non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, characterized by malignant T cells infiltrating the skin. CTCL exhibits vast heterogeneity which complicates diagnosis and therapeutic strategies. Current CTCL treatment includes skin-directed therapies (such as topical corticosteroid, topical mechlorethamine, topical bexarotene, ultraviolet phototherapy and localized radiotherapy), total skin electron beam therapy and systemic therapies. Elucidation of molecular and signaling pathways underlying CTCL pathogenesis leads to identification of innovative and personalized treatment schemes.Areas covered: The authors reviewed the molecular and immunological aspects of CTCL with special focus on Mycosis Fungoides (MF), Sézary Syndrome (SS) and associated systemic treatment. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science for peer-reviewed articles published until November 2020. Novel treatment approaches including retinoids, targeted therapies, immune checkpoint and JAK/STAT inhibitors, histones deacetylase (HDAC) and mTOR inhibitors as well as proteasome inhibitors, are discussed as potential therapeutic tools for the treatment of CTCL.Expert opinion: Novel therapeutic agents exhibit potential beneficial effects in CTCL patients of high need for therapy such as refractory early stage cutaneous and advanced stage disease. Therapeutic schemes employing a combination of novel agents with current treatment options may prove valuable for the future management of CTCL patients.

The Effect of Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Capacity of Diet on Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Phenotype: Nutrition as Therapeutic Tool?

Chronic inflammation and increased oxidative stress are contributing factors to many non-communicable diseases. A growing body of evidence indicates that dietary nutrients can activate the immune system and may lead to the overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Fatty acids as macronutrients are key players for immunomodulation, with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids having the most beneficial effect, while polyphenols and carotenoids seem to be the most promising antioxidants. Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease with multifactorial etiology. Obesity is a major risk factor for psoriasis, which leads to worse clinical outcomes. Weight loss interventions and, generally, dietary regimens such as gluten-free and Mediterranean diet or supplement use may potentially improve psoriasis' natural course and response to therapy. However, data about more sophisticated nutritional patterns, such as ketogenic, very low-carb or specific macro- and micro-nutrient substitution, are scarce. This review aims to present the effect of strictly structured dietary nutrients, that are known to affect glucose/lipid metabolism and insulin responses, on chronic inflammation and immunity, and to discuss the utility of nutritional regimens as possible therapeutic tools for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

How does the joint dermatology-rheumatology clinic benefit both patients and dermatologists?

Psoriasis (Pso) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are chronic and debilitating diseases which often develop in the same patient and are linked to a wide range of comorbid conditions. Dermatologists and rheumatologists need to cooperate in combined clinics, especially when they deal with severe, recalcitrant disease, and multiple comorbidities. The clinical and research benefits of this collaboration have been previously described to contribute to a better and more sustainable health care system. To apply a more holistic approach of patients with Pso and PsA, we established the first dual care clinic in Greece, for Pso and PsA patients, based at Attikon General University Hospital. Hereby, we describe the infrastructure and operation of a combined Pso and PsA clinic (PPAC), in the national health care system of Greece, and its impact on the management of Pso and PsA. The PPAC is a single-day joint clinic, held once a week, which consists of three dermatologists and three rheumatologists. We present the results of 185 newly diagnosed patients between December 2018 and January 2019. Mean age of onset of Pso was 34 ± 16 years old and 47 ± 12 years old for PsA. Most patients suffered from severe plaque Pso (144/185, 78%) and asymmetric oligoarticular arthritis (59/185, 32%), for which they were receiving treatment with biologic agents (105/185, 57%). Many required monitoring for hypertension (74/185, 40%), dyslipidemia (69/185, 37%), diabetes (17/185, 9%), and depression (20/185, 11%). Patients reported high levels of care satisfaction (visual analogue scale: 86 ± 11.5), using the PPAC facility, compared to different referrals between specialties. This is the first joint dermatology-rheumatology clinic in Greece, providing comprehensive care in patients with Pso and PsA. Our results support the concept of combined clinics delivering better integrated care for such patients.

Phototherapy as a first-line treatment for early-stage mycosis fungoides: The results of a large retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Phototherapy is one of the main treatments for mycosis fungoides (MF). In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of phototherapy as a first-line treatment in patients with early-stage disease. METHODS: We analyzed treatment outcomes in a group of 227 early-stage patients. The chi-squared test, the parametric t test, and ANOVA test and the non-parametric tests of Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis were applied for data analysis. RESULTS: 55.9% of patients treated with UVB-NB reached complete remission (CR), while analog rates after PUVA treatment were 74.5% (P = .015). Patients with patch-stage disease showed better response rates to PUVA compared to UVB-NB therapy (CRs 56.7% vs 91.3%, P < .001). Regarding the latter, long-lasting disease was proven as an independent negative prognostic factor for treatment outcome. Phototypes I and II were found to be favorable prognostic factors for patients treated with PUVA. Maintenance treatment did not alter final relapse rates but led to prolonged time to relapse compared to no-maintenance treated cases (19.5 months, vs 32.3, P < .002). CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicates that PUVA leads to better responses and longer relapse-free intervals both in patch- and plaque-stage disease. UVB-NB could be a valid therapeutic alternative for patients with recent disease presentation.

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus recommendations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome - Update 2017.

In order to provide a common standard for the treatment of mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force (EORTC-CLTF) published in 2006 its consensus recommendations for the stage-adapted selection of management options for these neoplasms. Since then, the understanding of the pathophysiology and epidemiology of MF/SS has advanced, the staging system has been revised, new outcome data have been published and novel treatment options have been introduced. The purpose of the present document is to update the original recommendations bearing in mind that there are still only a limited number of controlled studies to support treatment decisions for MF/SS and that often treatment is determined by institutional experience and availability. This consensus on treatment recommendations was established among the authors through a series of consecutive consultations in writing and a round of discussion. Recommended treatment options are presented according to disease stage, whenever possible categorised into first- and second-line options and supported with levels of evidence as devised by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM). Skin-directed therapies are still the most appropriate option for early-stage MF, and most patients can look forward to a normal life expectancy. For patients with advanced disease, prognosis is still grim, and only for a highly selected subset of patients, prolonged survival can be achieved with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). There is a high need for the development and investigation in controlled clinical trials of treatment options that are based on our increasing understanding of the molecular pathology of MF/SS.

The use of biologicals in cutaneous allergies - present and future.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Up-to-date biologicals in cutaneous allergies play - unfortunately - only a minor role. However, this situation might change. Recently, omalizumab was licensed for chronic urticaria; this article reviews recent advances in the use of biologicals in cutaneous allergies. RECENT FINDINGS: Interestingly, the mechanism of omalizumab appears to be different in urticaria and allergic asthma for which the drug has been licensed previously. In urticaria dosage is not dependent on serum IgE-levels and response is seen very often after only 12 h. Other indications in cutaneous allergy in which biologicals have been investigated, at least in case reports or small studies, are TNF-α-antagonists and rituximab in chronic urticaria, omalizumab, rituximab and TNF-α-antagonists in atopic dermatitis as well as mepolizumab in this disease. However, all these studies appear to show a benefit for individual patients but not a clear breakthrough for the whole group of patients involved. This, however, might also be one of the future approaches that sub-groups of patients who have different responses to biologicals may be identified, as apparently different cytokine patterns are predominantly involved in the individual patient. SUMMARY: In conclusion, although currently only one biological is approved in chronic urticaria, there is hope that a rapid better understanding of individual disease factors will support the development of other novel drugs in this field.

Safety and efficacy of low-dose bexarotene and PUVA in the treatment of patients with mycosis fungoides.

BACKGROUND: The new rexinoid bexarotene is a retinoid X receptor antagonist and immune response modifier. Although combinations of oral bexarotene and psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) have been tried in patients with all stages of mycosis fungoides (MF), the dosage of bexarotene used in these combination regimens has been variable. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of low-dose oral bexarotene and PUVA in patients with relapsed or treatment-refractory MF following monotherapy with multiple agents including PUVA, narrow-band UVB, interferon-alpha, oral bexarotene, and topical corticosteroids. METHOD: Combination therapy with PUVA three times weekly and low-dose oral bexarotene (150 or 300 mg/day, depending on physicians' preference) was administered to 14 patients, seven men and seven women (median age 49.5 years, range 30-75 years), with relapsed or refractory MF stages I-III. All responders received maintenance treatment at the same bexarotene dose that induced remission until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Low-dose oral bexarotene combined with PUVA was associated with an overall response rate (complete response or partial response) in 67% of the nine patients with refractory MF who completed the treatment course. Of these nine patients, four had a complete response, two had a partial response, one had stable disease, and two had progressive disease. Five patients withdrew because of hyperlipidemia. Oral bexarotene was continued as maintenance therapy in three of the four complete responders (one refused); two of these patients relapsed 2-10 months after PUVA discontinuation. Patients with partial response or stable disease received the combination for 3-5 months and were switched to another treatment regimen because of lack of further response. Therapy was fairly well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In a select population of patients who had not responded to at least one monotherapy for early-stage MF, a combination of low-dose oral bexarotene and PUVA was successful in achieving a satisfactory overall response rate in 67% of patients who completed the treatment course and was fairly well tolerated. Limitations of the study include the small number of patients evaluated, its retrospective nature, and the fact that patients were commenced on different bexarotene starting doses (150 or 300 mg/day), depending on physicians' preference.