Gadoxetate-enhanced dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for evaluation of liver function and liver fibrosis in preclinical trials.

BACKGROUND: To facilitate translational drug development for liver fibrosis, preclinical trials need to be run in parallel with clinical research. Liver function estimation by gadoxetate-enhanced dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is being established in clinical research, but still rarely used in preclinical trials. We aimed to evaluate feasibility of DCE-MRI indices as translatable biomarkers in a liver fibrosis animal model. METHODS: Liver fibrosis was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats by thioacetamide (200 mg, 150 mg, and saline for the high-dose, low-dose, and control groups, respectively). Subsequently, DCE-MRI was performed to measure: relative liver enhancement at 3-min (RLE-3), RLE-15, initial area-under-the-curve until 3-min (iAUC-3), iAUC-15, and maximum-enhancement (Emax). The correlation coefficients between these MRI indices and the histologic collagen area, indocyanine green retention at 15-min (ICG-R15), and shear wave elastography (SWE) were calculated. Diagnostic performance to diagnose liver fibrosis was also evaluated by receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Animal model was successful in that the collagen area of the liver was the largest in the high-dose group, followed by the low-dose group and control group. The correlation between the DCE-MRI indices and collagen area was high for iAUC-15, Emax, iAUC-3, and RLE-3 but moderate for RLE-15 (r, - 0.81, - 0.81, - 0.78, - 0.80, and - 0.51, respectively). The DCE-MRI indices showed moderate correlation with ICG-R15: the highest for iAUC-15, followed by iAUC-3, RLE-3, Emax, and RLE-15 (r, - 0.65, - 0.63, - 0.62, - 0.58, and - 0.56, respectively). The correlation coefficients between DCE-MRI indices and SWE ranged from - 0.59 to - 0.28. The diagnostic accuracy of RLE-3, iAUC-3, iAUC-15, and Emax was 100% (AUROC 1.000), whereas those of RLE-15 and SWE were relatively low (AUROC 0.777, 0.848, respectively). CONCLUSION: Among the gadoxetate-enhanced DCE-MRI indices, iAUC-15 and iAUC-3 might be bidirectional translatable biomarkers between preclinical and clinical research for evaluating histopathologic liver fibrosis and physiologic liver functions in a non-invasive manner.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for oncology drug development.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is a promising tool for evaluating tumor vascularity, as it can provide vasculature-derived, functional, and quantitative parameters. To implement DCE-MRI parameters as biomarkers for monitoring the effect of antiangiogenic or vascular-disrupting treatment, two crucial elements of surrogate endpoint, ie, validation and qualification, should be satisfied. Although early studies have shown the accuracy and reliability of DCE-MRI parameters for evaluating treatment-driven vascular alterations, there have been an increasing number of studies demonstrating the limitations of DCE-MRI parameters as surrogate endpoints. Therefore, in order to improve the application of DCE-MRI parameters in drug development, it is necessary to establish a standardized evaluation method and to determine the correct therapeutics-oriented meaning of individual DCE-MRI parameter. In this regard, this article describes the biophysical background and data acquisition/analysis techniques of DCE-MRI while focusing on the validation and qualification issues. Specifically, the causes of disagreement and confusion encountered in the preclinical and clinical trials using DCE-MRI are presented in detail. Finally, considering these limitations, we present potential strategies to optimize implementation of DCE-MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:251-264.