Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Amivantamab for EGFR-Mutant NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: Amivantamab-vmjw (amivantamab) is a bispecific EGFR/MET antibody approved for patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, after prior therapy. Nevertheless, the benefits and safety of amivantamab in other EGFR-mutant lung cancer, with or without osimertinib, and with concurrent radiation therapy, are less known. METHODS: We queried the MD Anderson Lung Cancer GEMINI, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Stanford Cancer Center's database for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with amivantamab, not on a clinical trial. The data analyzed included initial response, duration of treatment, and concomitant radiation safety in overall population and prespecified subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients received amivantamab. Median age was 65 (31-81) years old; 72.1% were female; and 77% were patients with never smoking history. Median number of prior lines of therapies was four. On the basis of tumor's EGFR mutation, 39 patients were in the classical mutation cohort, 15 patients in the exon 20 cohort, and seven patients in the atypical cohort. There were 37 patients (58.7%) who received amivantamab concomitantly with osimertinib and 25 patients (39.1%) who received concomitant radiation. Furthermore, 54 patients were assessable for response in the overall population; 19 patients (45.2%) had clinical response and disease control rate (DCR) was 64.3%. In the classical mutation cohort of the 33 assessable patients, 12 (36.4%) had clinical response and DCR was 48.5%. In the atypical mutation cohort, six of the seven patients (85.7%) had clinical response and DCR was 100%. Of the 13 assessable patients in the exon 20 cohort, five patients (35.7%) had clinical response and DCR was 64.3%. Adverse events reported with amivantamab use were similar as previously described in product labeling. No additional toxicities were noted when amivantamab was given with radiation with or without osimertinib. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world multicenter analysis revealed that amivantamab is a potentially effective treatment option for patients with EGFR mutations outside of exon 20 insertion mutations. The combination of osimertinib with amivantamab is safe and feasible. Radiation therapy also seems safe when administered sequentially or concurrently with amivantamab.

A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The optimal perioperative treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (LV5FU2) and LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) combination chemotherapies administered adjuvantly for curatively-resected, node-positive ESCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with pathologically node-positive esophageal cancer after curative R0 resection were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LV5FU2 or FOLFOX biweekly for up to eight cycles. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2015, 62 patients were randomized into the two treatment groups (32 in the LV5FU2 arm and 30 in the FOLFOX arm). The median age was 60 years and both groups had similar pathologic characteristics in tumor, nodal status, and location. Treatment completion rates were similarly high in both groups. The DFS rate at 12 months was 67% in the LV5FU2 group and 63% in the FOLFOX group with a hazard ratio of 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 2.62). After a median follow-up period of 27 months, the median DFS was 29.6 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 54.2) in the LV5FU2 arm and 16.8 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 26.1) in the FOLFOX arm (p=0.428), respectively, while the median overall survival was not reached in either arm. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more frequent in patients in the FOLFOX arm than the LV5FU2 arm (20.0% vs. 3.1%). CONCLUSION: The addition of oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) did not lead to better efficacy compared to LV5FU2 chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting in node-positive ESCC patients.

The optimal duration of vitamin supplementation prior to the first dose of pemetrexed in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Although folic acid and vitamin B12 supplements are recommended during pemetrexed therapy, the optimal duration for supplementation prior to the first dose of pemetrexed has not been defined. We analyzed adverse events during the first cycle of pemetrexed therapy in 350 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received pemetrexed monotherapy. Patients were divided into two groups: group A and group B included patients who started vitamin supplements 5-14 days versus within 4 days before the first dose of pemetrexed, respectively. Groups A and B included 294 (84.0%) and 56 (16.0%) patients, respectively. The median number of cycles of pemetrexed was three in both groups. Patients in group A and B showed similar rates of leukopenia (6.1% vs. 5.4%, respectively, P = 1.00), neutropenia (5.1% vs. 3.6%, P = 1.00), thrombocytopenia (3.1% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.14), neutropenic fever (0.7% vs. 0%, P = 1.00), fatigue (20.1% vs. 19.6%, P = 0.94), and anorexia (15.0% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.23) during the first cycle of pemetrexed therapy. There were no significant differences in terms of hospitalization (4.4% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.73) or unscheduled visits due to pemetrexed-related adverse events (8.2% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.31) between groups A and B, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that an age of ≥ 65 years (odds ratio, 3.49; 95% CI 1.12-10.86) and poor performance status (odds ratio, 3.96; 95% CI 1.12-14.03) were statistically significant predictive factors for grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity. The duration of vitamin supplementation before the first dose of pemetrexed did not affect the development of pemetrexed-related toxicities, suggesting that the initiation of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy does not have to be delayed to accommodate a vitamin supplementation schedule.

Multiplexed gene expression and fusion transcript analysis to detect ALK fusions in lung cancer.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) fusions have been identified in approximately 5% of non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) and define a distinct subpopulation of patients with lung cancer who are highly responsive to ALK kinase inhibitors, such as crizotinib. Because of this profound therapeutic implication, the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology recommend upfront ALK screening for all patients with NSCLC. The Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic test (ie, fluorescence in situ hybridization) for identification of ALK-positive patients, however, is complex and has considerable limitations in terms of cost and throughput, making it difficult to screen many patients. To explore alternative screening modalities for detecting ALK fusions, we designed a combination of two transcript-based assays to detect for presence or absence of ALK fusions using NanoString's nCounter technology. By using this combined gene expression and ALK fusion detection strategy, we developed a multiplexed assay with a quantitative scoring modality that is highly sensitive, reproducible, and capable of detecting low-abundant ALK fusion transcripts, even in samples with a low tumor cell content. In 66 archival NSCLC samples, our results were highly concordant to prior results obtained by fluorescence in situ hybridization and IHC. Our assay offers a cost-effective, easy-to-perform, high-throughput, and FFPE-compatible screening alternative for detection of ALK fusions.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of intrathecal administration of pemetrexed in rats.

PURPOSE: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is a devastating complication of malignant disease. In this study, we evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of intrathecally administered pemetrexed in rats. METHODS: Three levels of pemetrexed (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) were administered to 15 rats per level (45 rats in total) twice a week for 2 weeks through specifically designed indwelling subarachnoid catheters. Presence of clinical and pathological neurotoxicity was evaluated. To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed, independent cohorts of 30 rats were treated with 1 mg/kg of pemetrexed and its concentration in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood was measured using UPLC/MS/MS. RESULTS: There were no cases of clinical or pathologic neurotoxicity after intrathecal administrations of pemetrexed at levels of 0.3 and 1 mg/kg; however, 5 of 15 (33%) rats died after administration of 3 mg/kg pemetrexed. The distribution/elimination of pemetrexed in CSF was best described by a two-compartment model, with initial and terminal half-lives of 0.43 and 1.43 h, respectively. The predicted maximal concentration in CSF was 588 µM, and high levels of pemetrexed appeared to be maintained for a long time. Area under the curve and volume of distribution at steady state were 560 µM h and 1.14 ml, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The no observed adverse effect level of intrathecal administration of pemetrexed was 1 mg/kg in rats. At this level, therapeutically high and durable pemetrexed concentrations could be achieved. Based on these results, further research on intrathecal pemetrexed in humans or non-human primates should be considered.

Lung cancer working group report.

Asia needs a guideline for non-small-cell lung cancer because of differences in medical care, medical care insurance, ethnic variation and drug approval lag within Asian countries and compared with Western countries. Due to ethnic differences, drug dosages are often higher in the USA than in Japan. EGFR mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer was detected in 32% of Asians but only 6% of non-Asians, while differences in irinotecan metabolism cause higher frequencies of toxicity (leukopenia, diarrhea) in Asians. Pharmacodynamic ethnic differences in relation to paclitaxel/carboplatin resulted in longer median survival and a higher 1-year survival rate for Japanese-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients compared with Americans. To solve the problem of drug lag, pharmaceutical companies must perform multinational Asian clinical trials with quick accrual of patients, while regulatory authorities must establish high-quality, efficient approval processes, and achieve regulatory harmonization. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network promotes creation of national clinical practice guidelines, and Korea, China and Thailand adapted the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Many Asian countries still lack such guidelines, and there are no pan-Asian guidelines for non-small-cell lung cancer. Japan developed its own non-small-cell lung cancer guidelines and also a gefitinib guidance. The study group members concluded that immediate establishment of an Asian non-small-cell lung cancer guideline will be difficult because of the differences among the countries. Asian collaborative trials on treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer need to be started at an early date to generate Asian data.

Phase II, double-blinded, randomized study of enzastaurin plus pemetrexed as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: We examined the efficacy of enzastaurin plus pemetrexed as second-line therapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIA/B or IV) non-small cell lung cancer in a double-blinded, randomized, phase II study. METHODS: Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m intravenously on day 1 of 21-day cycles (day 8 in cycle 1) plus oral enzastaurin (250 mg two times per day; combination arm) or placebo (pemetrexed arm). Both arms received supplementation with vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone. An interim analysis was conducted to determine whether efficacy would warrant a phase III study. RESULTS: The interim analysis showed no evidence of improved progression-free survival with enzastaurin. At final analysis (N = 160, 80 in each arm), baseline characteristics were well balanced. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival (3.0 months, p = 0.544) or overall survival (9.6 months in combination arm and 7.4 months in pemetrexed arm, p = 0.171). Drug-related serious adverse events included cerebrovascular accident, palpitations, and renal failure (n = 1, each) in combination arm and neutropenic sepsis, thrombocytopenia, and panniculitis (n = 1, each) in pemetrexed arm. Nonhematologic drug-related grade 3/4 toxicities were similar in both arms. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were higher with the combination, specifically leukopenia (6.3% versus 0%), neutropenia (15.2% versus 5.0%), and thrombocytopenia (8.9% versus 1.3%). Of the 26 deaths reported on-study or within 30 days of discontinuation (10 in combination arm and 16 in pemetrexed arm), none were drug related. CONCLUSION: The combination regimen of enzastaurin and pemetrexed is well tolerated but does not improve efficacy over pemetrexed and placebo as second-line treatment of unselected patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Adenocarcinoma has an excellent outcome with pemetrexed treatment in Korean patients: a prospective, multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective multicenter study conducted by the Korean Cancer Study Group evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed in Korean patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had prior chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC in whom prior chemotherapy failed received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation until disease progression or the development of intolerable toxicity. Eighty-one patients were enrolled. RESULTS: The overall response rate for 78 evaluable patients was 5.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-12.6; partial response 4/78, no complete response]. The disease control rate including complete, partial response and stable disease was 46.2% (36/78, 95% CI 34.8-57.8). With a median 8.7 months follow-up, the median time to progression was 3.1 months (95% CI 1.17-5.03) and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.8 months (95% CI 5.19-10.35). The median OS for patients with adenocarcinoma histology was 18.7 months compared to 6.1 months for non-adenocarcinoma. In a multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 [hazards ratio (HR)=0.331, 95% CI 0.135-0.814] and adenocarcinoma (HR=0.504, 95% CI 0.283-0.899) were independent factors for prolongation of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed monotherapy has promising efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC as a second-line therapy with less hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity, especially in those with adenocarcinoma histology.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in lymph node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In this study we explored the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive, resected thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. METHODS: A prospective study of postoperative chemotherapy in N1 esophageal cancer patients who received curative resection was conducted and compared with the historical control group in regard to recurrence rate, patterns of failure, disease-free survival rate, and overall survival rate. The postoperative chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (60 mg/m2 intravenously) and 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m2 per day) in a continuous infusion for 4 days. Three cycles were administered at 3-week intervals. RESULTS: Forty patients were accrued from January 1998 to January 2003 at Samsung Medical Center for adjuvant chemotherapy. The historical control group consisted of 52 patients who received curative resection but not adjuvant chemotherapy during the same period of time. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 47.6% in the adjuvant group and 35.6% in the control group (p = 0.049). The estimated 5-year overall survival rates were 50.7% in the adjuvant group and 43.7% in the control group (p = 0.228). The significant predictive factors for tumor recurrence were the number of positive lymph nodes (p = 0.008) and the adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the postoperative chemotherapy may prolong disease-free survival in lymph node-positive, curatively resected esophageal cancer patients. The postoperative treatment modality for esophageal cancer patients should be determined according to the lymph node status and a randomized phase III clinical trial is warranted using adjuvant chemotherapy if the esophageal cancer is lymph node-positive.

An observational study suggesting clinical benefit for adjuvant postoperative chemoradiation in a population of over 500 cases after gastric resection with D2 nodal dissection for adenocarcinoma of the stomach.

PURPOSE: The role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in D2-resected gastric-cancer patients has not been defined yet. We investigated the effect of postoperative chemoradiotherapy on the relapse rate and survival rate of patients with D2-resected gastric cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From August 1995 to April 2001, 544 patients received postoperative CRT after curative D2 resection. During the same period of time, 446 patients received surgery without further adjuvant treatment. The adjuvant CRT consisted of 400 mg/m2 of fluorouracil plus 20 mg/m2 of leucovorin for 5 days, followed by 4,500 cGy of radiotherapy for 5 weeks, with fluorouracil and leucovorin on the first 4 and the last 3 days of radiotherapy. Two 5-day cycles of fluorouracil and leucovorin were given 4 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy. RESULTS: The median duration of overall survival was significantly longer in the CRT group than in the comparison group (95.3 months vs. 62.6 months), which corresponds to a hazard ratio for death of 0.80 (p = 0.0200) or a reduction of 20% in the risk of death in the CRT group. The 5-year survival rates were consistently longer in the CRT group at Stages II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV than those in the comparison group. The CRT was associated with increases in the median duration of relapse-free survival (75.6 months vs. 52.7 months; hazard ratio for relapse, 0.80, p = 0.0160). CONCLUSION: Our results highly suggest that the postoperative chemoradiotherapy in D2-resected gastric-cancer patients can prolong survival and decrease recurrence.