Sleep wake disturbances in people with cancer and their caregivers: state of the science.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To review the state of the science on sleep/wake disturbances in people with cancer and their caregivers. DATA SOURCES: Published articles, books and book chapters, conference proceedings, and MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library computerized databases. DATA SYNTHESIS: Scientists have initiated studies on the prevalence of sleep/wake disturbances and the etiology of sleep disturbances specific to cancer. Measurement has been limited by lack of clear definitions of sleep/wake variables, use of a variety of instruments, and inconsistent reporting of sleep parameters. Findings related to use of nonpharmacologic interventions were limited to 20 studies, and the quality of the evidence remains poor. Few pharmacologic approaches have been studied, and evidence for use of herbal and complementary supplements is almost nonexistent. CONCLUSIONS: Current knowledge indicates that sleep/wake disturbances are prevalent in cancer populations. Few instruments have been validated in this population. Nonpharmacologic interventions show positive outcomes, but design issues and small samples limit generalizability. Little is known regarding use of pharmacologic and herbal and complementary supplements and potential adverse outcomes or interactions with cancer therapies. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: All patients and caregivers need initial and ongoing screening for sleep/wake disturbances. When disturbed sleep/wakefulness is evident, further assessment and treatment are warranted. Nursing educational programs should include content regarding healthy and disrupted sleep/wake patterns. Research on sleep/wake disturbances in people with cancer should have high priority.

Symptom interactions as mechanisms underlying symptom pairs and clusters.

PURPOSE: To present a summary of the potential shared or interactive mechanisms underlying an exemplar symptom pair: sleep disturbances and pain. ORGANIZING CONSTRUCT: Understanding of the multidimensional shared and interactive mechanisms underlying symptoms pairs and clusters has the potential to enhance symptom management. METHODS: Reviews of the literature were conducted to search for information on shared or interactive mechanisms underlying sleep disturbances and pain; minimal data were available. Relevant information about individual symptoms was outlined and categorized in areas often used to describe the multidimensional nature of symptoms, including the physiological, psychological, behavioral, and sociocultural domains. This information was examined for relationships and commonalities. CONCLUSIONS: Many potential shared and interactive mechanisms underlying the symptom pair of sleep disturbances and pain were identified. These results indicate the need for further work and theory development in this area. The symptom interactional framework is a beginning conceptual perspective designed to facilitate this work. Implications for interdisciplinary translational research designed to optimize symptom management are discussed.