Long-Term Cost Analysis of Third-Line Treatment Options for Overactive Bladder.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to analyze the long-term cost of overactive bladder third-line treatments. METHODS: This insurance claims review analyzed the 2015 to 2020 MarketScan (MKS) claims data set subjects age ≥ 18, diagnosis of overactive bladder (OAB) using ICD-9/ICD-10 codes and receipt of treatment for percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation (SNM), or botulinum A. Age, gender, treatment types, and cost were extracted. Treatment costs were aggregated at the level of patient and treatment type for total payment and patient contribution by combining copay, coinsurance, and deductible. We used the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous and chi-square test for categorical variables. SAS v9.4 was used for analyses. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: We identified 17,755 patients from the commercial claims MKS and 10,912 patients from the Medicare supplemental (MDC) database with mean age 50.7±11.1 and 75.5±7.6 years, respectively, who underwent ≥ 1 third-line OAB treatment. Patients receiving third-line treatment were predominantly female (84.9%, MKS, 74.8%, MDC). Long-term costs over a 15-year period were estimated. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is the most expensive in terms of total net payment ($105,337.50 MKS, $94,102.50 MDC) and patient contribution ($9177.60 MKS, $3921.00 MDC). Total net payment for botulinum A was $67,968 (MSK), $54,261 (MDC), and patient contribution cost was $2850 (MSK), $1110 (MDC). The most cost-effective option was SNM in terms of both total net payment ($5179.10 MKS, $6099.00 MDC) and patient contribution ($59.10 MKS, $60.00 MDC). CONCLUSIONS: SNM was the most cost-effective third-line treatment for OAB looking over a 15-year period in terms of both total net payment and patient contribution.

Contemporary Patterns of Third-line Treatments for Privately Insured Individuals With Overactive Bladder in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate utilization of third-line overactive bladder (OAB) treatments including percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), and intradetrusor botulinum toxin A (BTX) among privately insured patients and examine factors associated with their use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using MarketScan claims (2015-2017), we identified patients who underwent third-line OAB treatments based on procedure codes. Factors of interest included location, age, health plan, among others. We fit multivariable logistic regression models to estimate associations between pertinent factors with receipt of PTNS and SNS relative to BTX and associations between provider type and practice location with each treatment modality. RESULTS: We identified 7383 patients (mean age 50.9) in our cohort. SNS was used most frequently (n = 3602, 48.8%), while PTNS was used least frequently (n = 955, 12.9%). PTNS patients were more likely to reside in metropolitan areas (vs BTX: OR 1.6, 95%CI 1.3-2.1; vs SNS: OR 2.2, 95%CI 1.7-2.8), be aged 55 years or older (vs BTX: 54% vs 47%, OR 1.6, 95%CI 1.2-2.1; vs SNS: 54% vs 45%, OR 1.6, 95%CI 1.2-2.0), and be covered under a health maintenance organization (vs BTX: 17% vs 10%; vs SNS: 17% vs 10%, P <.01). Urologists were most likely to perform SNS, and gynecologists were most likely to perform BTX. 91% of PTNS procedures were performed in office settings. CONCLUSION: Among patients receiving third-line OAB treatment, PTNS was used infrequently. PTNS utilization was concentrated within urban areas, and among older patients and those covered by cost-conscious health maintenance organizations.

Safety and Efficacy of Ureteral Stent Placement at the Bedside Using Local Anesthesia.

PURPOSE: Ureteral stent placement for decompressing renal units obstructed by calculi is safe and can be potentially lifesaving in the prompt resolution of the sequelae of renal obstruction, infection and an obstructing stone. At many institutions there can be prolonged delay in getting patients to the operating room for stent placement. We hypothesized that it is safe and efficacious to attempt ureteral stent placement using local anesthesia at the bedside without live fluoroscopic guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients presenting with symptomatic, obstructing ureteral calculi were given the option of bedside ureteral stent placement. Viscous lidocaine was placed into the urethra before flexible cystoscopic examination. A 260 cm Glidewire® was used as initial access with only 1 attempt at passage. All stent placements were confirmed with immediate post-procedure radiograph. Prospectively collected data were retrospectively analyzed for all patients who underwent attempted bedside ureteral stent placement. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients underwent attempted bedside stent placement under local anesthesia without fluoroscopic guidance. Mean stone size was 8.3 mm and 71% of stones were in the proximal ureter. Ureteral stent placement was pursued in 14% of patients for infection and in 59% for intractable pain. Ureteral stent placement was successful in 30 patients (71%). Statistical analysis did not reveal any significant predictors of successful stent placement in this cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort bedside ureteral stent placement was well tolerated, safe and efficacious, thus expediting upper tract decompression in the setting of obstructed renal units in more than 70% of patients.