Higher versus standard amikacin single dose in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a randomised controlled trial.

Recent studies suggest that intensive care unit patients treated with amikacin frequently do not attain the desired pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target, i.e. peak amikacin concentration (Cpeak) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio of ≥8, when a single dose of 15 mg/kg is used. No data are available for patients admitted to the emergency department (ED). The aim of this prospective randomised controlled study was to determine PK/PD target attainment in ED patients presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock treated with 15 mg/kg versus 25 mg/kg amikacin. Patients were randomly assigned to receive amikacin 25 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg. Amikacin Cpeak values were determined. The primary outcome was target attainment defined as Cpeak/MIC ≥ 8 both using EUCAST susceptibility breakpoints and actually documented MICs as denominator. A total of 104 patients were included. The EUCAST-based target was attained in 76% vs. 40% of patients assigned to the 25 mg/kg vs. 15 mg/kg dose groups (P <0.0001). Target attainment using actual MICs (median of 2 mg/L, documented in 48 isolated Gram-negative pathogens) was achieved in 95% vs. 94% of patients in the 25 mg/kg vs. 15 mg/kg dose groups (P = 0.969). Risk factors associated with PK/PD target failure were identified in the multivariable analysis. At least 25 mg/kg amikacin as a single dose should be used in ED patients with severe sepsis and septic shock to attain the EUCAST-based PK/PD target. However, when using local epidemiology as denominator, 15 mg/kg appears to be sufficient. [ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02365272.

Immunogenicity of a standard trivalent influenza vaccine in patients on long-term hemodialysis: an open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: Disturbances in acquired immunity are considered to be responsible, at least in part, for the high infection rate and inadequate response to vaccinations observed in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The present prospective trial aimed to: (1) evaluate the immunogenicity of a standard influenza vaccine in HD patients, and (2) identify determinants of the immune response. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective interventional open-label study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 201 long-term HD patients and 41 healthy volunteers. INTERVENTION: Vaccination with a standard trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was seroprotection rate, defined as percentage of participants with an antibody titer of 40 or greater 1 month after vaccination. MEASUREMENTS: All antibody titers were determined in duplicate by using the hemagglutination inhibition assay. Regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between demographics, uremic retention solutes (including p-cresol), inflammation, nutrition, iron status, trace elements, and immune response in HD patients. RESULTS: More than 80% of HD patients showed seroprotection after vaccination. The immune response of HD patients was similar to that of healthy volunteers. Booster vaccination did not improve the immune response. High serum ferritin level was the only parameter independently associated with a better vaccination-induced antibody response in HD patients. LIMITATIONS: A high seroprotection rate at baseline undermined the power to identify clinical determinants of the immune response. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination is as efficacious in HD patients as in healthy volunteers. With the exception of serum ferritin, none of the investigated parameters of nutrition, inflammation, and dialysis adequacy had a significant impact on the immune response. Our data support annual vaccination of HD patients and question the clinical relevance of disturbances in acquired immunity in contemporary HD patients.