Vitamin D Levels in Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Patients With or Without Nasal Polyposis: A Systematic Review.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a large group of heterogeneous diseases characterized by extensive inflammation of the nasal mucosa and sinuses. Vitamin D (VD), as an immunoregulatory hormone, may play an important role in the pathophysiology of CRS. The purpose of this study is to review the existing literature that correlates VD levels with CRS with or without nasal polyps. A systematic manual search was conducted in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases up to July 2023. Articles from PubMed and the first 100 articles from Google Scholar were recorded for our research. Keywords used were the following: vitamin D, chronic rhinosinusitis, and nasal polyps. Among the 134 articles retrieved, only 18 were eligible. The other 116 studies were excluded as they related VD levels with other conditions (e.g., allergic rhinitis) and for other reasons. However, we identified two more eligible records through the manual research of the above-mentioned 132 studies, and finally, 20 records were included in the current review. The review concerned case-control studies, prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies. Based on our review, we concluded that CRS patients are correlated with the lowest VD levels, accompanied by increased severity of the disease, especially in those with nasal polyposis. Patients can benefit from appropriate VD supplementation, and serum VD levels should be included in the laboratory assessment of CRS. However, due to the heterogeneity of the individuals involved, more well-designed clinical trials as well as randomized clinical trials should be conducted for further validation of the above findings in the general population in the future.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam To Treat Life-Threatening Infections by Carbapenem-Resistant Pathogens in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Data on the effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients are limited. The present retrospective observational cohort study, which was conducted in two general intensive care units (ICUs) in central Greece, compared critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients suffering from carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections receiving CAZ-AVI to patients who received appropriate available antibiotic therapy. Clinical and microbiological outcomes and safety issues were evaluated. A secondary analysis in patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) was conducted. Forty-one patients that received CAZ-AVI (the CAZ-AVI group) were compared to 36 patients that received antibiotics other than CAZ-AVI (the control group). There was a significant improvement in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on days 4 and 10 in the CAZ-AVI group compared to that in the control group (P = 0.006, and P = 0.003, respectively). Microbiological eradication was accomplished in 33/35 (94.3%) patients in the CAZ-AVI group and 21/31 (67.7%) patients in the control group (P = 0.021), and clinical cure was observed in 33/41 (80.5%) versus 19/36 (52.8%) patients (P = 0.010), respectively. The results were similar in the BSI subgroups for both outcomes (P = 0.038 and P = 0.014, respectively). The 28-day survival was 85.4% in the CAZ-AVI group and 61.1% in the control group (log-rank test = 0.035), while there were 2 and 12 relapses in the CAZ-AVI and control groups, respectively (P = 0.042). A CAZ-AVI-containing regime was an independent predictor of survival and clinical cure (odds ratio [OR] = 5.575 and P = 0.012 and OR = 5.125 and P = 0.004, respectively), as was illness severity. No significant side effects were recorded. In conclusion, a CAZ-AVI-containing regime was more effective than other available antibiotic agents for the treatment of CRE infections in the high-risk, mechanically ventilated ICU population evaluated.

Is minocycline a solution for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii?

Minocycline is an old, safe, second-line antimicrobial agent that has drawn attention over the last few years as a possible therapeutic option against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB) clinical isolates. Recent in vitro and in vivo results indicate that minocycline is a valid, alternative treatment option for minocycline-susceptible MDR-AB. Although effective alone, its administration as monotherapy should be avoided. Combinations with other antimicrobials can reduce the MIC of each component, present synergism and minimize the risk for drug resistance. Owing to its limited solubility in urine, it should be avoided for urinary pathogens. The present article reports all available information regarding its use as a therapeutic option against MDR-AB.