Chiropractic patients in the Netherlands: a descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the worldwide popularity of chiropractic, there is still relatively little known about the patients who visit chiropractors in the Netherlands and other European countries. OBJECTIVE: To describe in-depth the patient population of new patients to chiropractors in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Study population consisted of 10 consecutive new patients per participating chiropractor. A retrospective-type questionnaire was used. SETTING: Private practice. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mode of referral, area, and nature of the complaints; related to the chief complaint: previous treatments, examinations, type of referral, days lost at work, level of pain, and treatment expectations. RESULTS: Of the 130 chiropractors registered with the Netherlands Chiropractors'Association, 94 chiropractors(78%) participated. Eight hundred thirty-three patients (89%) returned questionnaires. By far, the greatest reason that patients visit chiropractors in the Netherlands is for neuromusculoskeletal (NMS) complaints. At the time of examination, 86% of the patients had spinal-related complaints, of which 12% involved multiple areas of the spine. Non-NMS complaints are minimal (<2%). Seventy-seven percent of patients with NMS complaints have chronic complaints (>12 weeks). Three-quarters of these patients have undergone previous conservative therapy for their complaint, which includes physical and manual therapy, postural correction, and exercise therapy. Despite the chronic nature of their complaints, patients have high expectations that their treatment will be effective. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who see chiropractors in the Netherlands have chronic NMS-related complaints. Chiropractors are not a part of the normal referral system in this country, with the result that the patients have rather long histories, including previous evaluations by medical specialists and other previous forms of (conservative) care.

Chiropractic in The Netherlands: a survey of Dutch chiropractors.

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, there is increasing public and political interest in chiropractic treatment. There is, however, very little descriptive information available in the Netherlands on the chiropractic profession. Therefore, a survey was conducted among all Dutch chiropractors. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all members of the Netherlands' Chiropractors Association (n = 59). It contained questions on (postgraduate) education, practice management, diagnostics (including radiology use), treatment, interprofessional cooperation and referral. RESULTS: The response was 88%. Chiropractic is growing rapidly: the number of chiropractors has doubled in five years. Chiropractors primarily treat back and neck pain, with an average of 8 treatments. Conventional orthopedic and neurological examination along with motion palpation are the cornerstones of physical examination. The respondents stressed the importance of direct access to radiography and specialized (hospital) diagnostics. Fifty-eight percent of the chiropractors have their own X-ray equipment. The most frequent reason for taking new X-rays was the absence of cooperation with radiology departments. Self-referral is the largest source of patients. The referral rate to other health care professionals is low. CONCLUSIONS: The number of chiropractors is growing rapidly. They have an exceptional position in the Dutch health care system. Access to X-ray and more specialized diagnostics are presently the most important political issues.

High-dose cisplatin with sodium thiosulfate protection.

Nephrotoxicity frequently limits the dose of cisplatin to less than 120 mg/m2 per injection. Sodium thiosulfate is a neutralizing agent for cisplatin that protects against renal damage. To determine whether injection of thiosulfate would permit larger doses of cisplatin to be administered, a fixed 9.9-g/m2 dose of thiosulfate was given intravenously over three hours concurrently with escalating doses of cisplatin. Cisplatin was administered over the last two hours of the thiosulfate infusion. Using this technique, it was possible to escalate the cisplatin dose to 225 mg/m2 before dose-limiting toxicities were encountered. Comparison of cisplatin pharmacokinetics in patients treated with 202.5 mg/m2 plus thiosulfate to those in patients treated with 100 mg/m2 without thiosulfate indicated that there were no changes in the elimination rate constant, volume of distribution, or total body clearance of cisplatin. The total drug exposure for the plasma was approximately twofold at the higher cisplatin dose. This study demonstrates that concurrent administration of thiosulfate permits at least a twofold increase in dose and total exposure to cisplatin.

Effect of allopurinol on the toxicity of high-dose 5-fluorouracil administered by intermittent bolus injection.

The effect of allopurinol pretreatment on the toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was examined in a clinical trial. Twenty-three patients were given bolus infusions of 5-FU every two weeks in doses that produced mild toxicity (0.8-1.9 g/m2). On alternate courses patients were pretreated with allopurinol either 300 mg two hours prior to and 10 hours after 5-FU, or 300 mg every 8 hours for 4 doses starting 24 hours before 5-FU. Seventeen and 20 pairs of courses were evaluable from the 2- and 24-hour pretreatment groups, respectively. Allopurinol did not produce a significant degree of protection against 5-FU-induced myelosuppression or mucositis on either dose schedule. Neurotoxicity manifesting as both cerebellar and encephalopathic signs and symptoms was the most important toxicity encountered and was dose-limiting for 5-FU on this schedule. Mean oxipurinol serum concentrations at the time of 5-FU administration were 24 microM and 104 microM for the 2- and 24-hour allopurinol pretreatment schedules respectively. Allopurinol increased the T 1/2 of 5-FU by a mean of 67% in three of the four patients studied. Pretreatment with allopurinol did not reduce the toxicity of 5-FU administered as an intravenous bolus.