Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Laryngoscope ; 129(10): 2384-2390, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30693546

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) as a treatment for tinnitus. STUDY DESIGN: Single-site prospective interventional clinical trial at a university hospital in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Participants were provided with tEMDR. This is a bespoke EMDR protocol that was developed specifically to treat individuals with tinnitus. Participants received a maximum of 10 sessions of tEMDR. Outcome measures including tinnitus questionnaires and mood questionnaires were recorded at baseline, discharge, and at 6 months postdischarge. RESULTS: Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory scores demonstrated a statistically significant improvement at discharge after EMDR intervention (P = .0005 and P = .0098, respectively); this improvement was maintained at 6 months postdischarge. There was also a moderate but not significant (P = .0625) improvement in Beck Anxiety Inventory scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that the provision of tEMDR has resulted in a clinically and statistically significant improvement in tinnitus symptoms in the majority of those participants who took part. Furthermore, the treatment effect was maintained at 6 months after treatment ceased. This study is of particular interest, as the study protocol was designed to be purposefully inclusive of a diverse range of tinnitus patients. However, as a small uncontrolled study, these results do not consider the significant effects of placebo and therapist interaction. Larger high-quality studies are essential for the verification of these preliminary results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:2384-2390, 2019.


Assuntos
Dessensibilização e Reprocessamento através dos Movimentos Oculares/métodos , Zumbido/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Audição , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Zumbido/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido
2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (5): CD004617, 2013 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23728650

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Malignant, or necrotising, otitis externa is a potentially fatal infection of the external ear canal and surrounding soft tissue and bone. It may be complicated by involvement of cranial nerves, principally the facial nerves and the contents of the jugular foramen. It is an uncommon condition mainly found in the elderly or in diabetics. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen treatment for malignant otitis externa. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the most recent search was 4 April 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, involving adults, undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy in malignant otitis externa. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No identified articles described randomised controlled trials of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of malignant otitis externa. MAIN RESULTS: Due to the lack of data we could present no results. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No clear evidence exists to demonstrate the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy when compared to treatment with antibiotics and/or surgery. We found no data to compare rates of complication between the different treatment modalities. Further research is required.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/terapia , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Otite Externa/terapia , Humanos , Necrose/terapia
3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (3): CD007330, 2010 Mar 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20238353

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus is described as the perception of sound or noise in the absence of real acoustic stimulation. Although an outright cure for tinnitus remains elusive, various management strategies have been developed to help to lessen the impact of the symptom. Following the publication of a neurophysiological model of tinnitus, Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) was developed. Using a combination of directive counselling and sound therapy in a strict framework, this is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for tinnitus. Many studies refer to the use of TRT where in fact a modified version of this therapy is actually being implemented. It is therefore important to confirm the use of authentic TRT when reviewing any study that reports its use. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of TRT in the treatment of tinnitus. SEARCH STRATEGY: The search included the Cochrane ENT Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMBASE and reference lists of identified publications. The date of the most recent search was 26 August 2009. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of TRT versus no treatment, or other forms of treatment, in adult patients with tinnitus. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors critically appraised the retrieved studies for risk of bias and extracted data independently. Where necessary, we contacted the original study authors for further information. MAIN RESULTS: Only one trial (123 participants) was included in the review. Several excluded trials did not follow the strict protocol for TRT, evaluating instead a modified form of TRT. The included trial showed TRT to be more effective than a tinnitus masking (TM) approach. In this study outcome data for tinnitus severity were presented using three instruments (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ), Tinnitus Severity Index (TSI)) for patients in three groups (participants' tinnitus being a 'moderate problem', big problem' or 'very big problem').At 18 months, improvements for the three groups in the three scores (TRT versus TM) were respectively: 'moderate problem' - THI: 18.2 versus 4.6, THQ: 489 versus 178, TSI 7.5 versus 1.6; 'big problem' - THI: 29.2 versus 16.7, THQ: 799 versus 256, TSI: 12.1 versus 6.7; and 'very big problem' - THI: 50.4 versus 10.3, THQ; 1118 versus 300, TSI: 19.7 versus 4.8. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A single, low-quality randomised controlled trial suggests that TRT is much more effective as a treatment for patients with tinnitus than tinnitus masking.


Assuntos
Estimulação Acústica/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Zumbido/terapia , Adulto , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Zumbido/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA