RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Malnutrition in chronic pancreatitis is complex and multifactorial, with malabsorption, pain, toxic dependencies and co-morbidities, such as diabetes, each playing a role. The aims of this systematic review were to assess the impact of nutritional intervention on markers of nutritional status in this complex patient group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of EMBASE and PubMed was carried out in February 2020, identifying 2620 articles. After screening to exclude those reporting short term changes (less than 3 months), with only one data point, or in the wrong population, eight papers were selected for analysis. RESULTS: Seven studies documented the impact of a nutritional intervention, one was an observational study only. Overall, studies were limited by predominantly retrospective designs, heterogenous populations and poor control of potentially confounding variables. Data could not be combined due to variability in reporting methods. All studies exploring nutritional intervention, whether that consisted of advice by a specialist dietitian, dose escalation of pancreatic enzymes, oral nutritional supplements or enteral feeding, demonstrated improved body weight and pain control, whereas patients who did not receive an intervention deteriorated nutritionally. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic pancreatitis benefit from nutritional intervention. Further work is required to explore the impact of nutritional intervention on body composition and functional outcomes.
Assuntos
Desnutrição , Pancreatite Crônica , Suplementos Nutricionais , Humanos , Estado Nutricional , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Hypomagnesaemia is recognised as a feature of the renal tubular defect produced by cis-platinum therapy for cancer. It may be sufficiently severe to cause tetany and grand mal fits. Attempts to correct established hypomagnesaemia whilst continuing cis-platinum therapy have not proved satisfactory. We have therefore investigated the prophylactic addition of 3 g magnesium sulphate to the high-dose platinum regimen with which metastatic malignant teratoma is treated in this unit. Serum magnesium levels have been measured in eight patients treated in this way and compared with those recorded for eight matched patients previously treated without routine magnesium supplements. Magnesium levels fell into the range frequently associated with clinical manifestation in five of the eight unsupplemented patients and only one of those given magnesium prophylactically. Mean serum magnesium levels were significantly higher in the supplemented group when compared using the paired t-test (P less than 0.01). Routine supplementation with intravenous magnesium sulphate is a simple and effective way of preventing symptomatic hypomagnesaemia associated with cis-platinum therapy.