Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Reumatismo ; 76(1)2024 Mar 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523582

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report cross-sectionally serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] in women living in Italy within 12 months from breast cancer (BC) diagnosis. METHODS: Baseline data were obtained from 394 women diagnosed with primary BC, enrolled from 2016 to 2019 in a lifestyle trial conducted in Italy. Subjects' characteristics were compared between two 25(OH)D concentrations (hypovitaminosis D<20 and ≥20 ng/mL) with the Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test for small-expected counts. Using multiple logistic regression-adjusted models, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) of hypovitaminosis D with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in the total sample and in the unsupplemented subgroup. RESULTS: Hypovitaminosis D was found in 39% of all subjects, 60% in unsupplemented subjects, and 10% in supplemented subjects. Increasing ORs of hypovitaminosis D were found with increasing body mass index, 25-30, >30, and ≥35 versus <25 kg/m2 (ORs: 2.50, 4.64, and 5.81, respectively, in the total cohort and ORs: 2.68, 5.38, and 7.08 in the unsupplemented); living in the most southern Italian region (OR 2.50, 95%CI 1.22-5.13); and with hypertriglyceridemia (OR 2.46; 95%CI 1.16-5.22), chemotherapy history (OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.03-3.38), and inversely with anti-estrogenic therapy (OR 0.43, 95%CI 0.24-0.75) in the total sample. CONCLUSIONS: Hypovitaminosis D in women recently diagnosed with BC and participating in a lifestyle trial in Italy was widespread and highest with obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, and chemotherapy use. Considering that hypovitaminosis D is a risk factor for lower efficacy of bone density treatments and possibly BC mortality, our results suggest the need to promptly address and treat vitamin D deficiency.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Hipertrigliceridemia , Deficiência de Vitamina D , Vitamina D , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Hipertrigliceridemia/complicações , Itália/epidemiologia , Estilo de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Deficiência de Vitamina D/epidemiologia
2.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 19(15): 2830-7, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26241537

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Mesalazine or Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) enema have been shown effective in treatment of distal active ulcerative colitis (UC). This study was aimed to determine whether the combination of topical mesalazine and BDP is superior to topical mesalazine or BDP used alone in patients with distal active UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One-hundred and twenty patients with clinical, endoscopic and histological diagnosis of distal active UC were randomly assigned to a regimen with mesalazine tablets 2.4 g/day associated to either mesalazine enema 4 g/day (group A, n=40), BDP 3 mg/60 ml every day (group B, n=40) or the combination treatment with the two compounds in a single administration (group C, n=40) for eight weeks. After four weeks of treatment all patients underwent clinical controls but only 109 patients returned back for clinical, endoscopic and histological controls at the end of the treatment period. RESULTS: After eight weeks, complete remission rates were of 52%, 47% and 65% respectively, in group A, B and C. From baseline to 4 and 8 weeks the CAI score decreased significantly in all the three groups (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: All the three combinations achieved equivalent results in terms of symptoms in inducing symptoms relief and mucosa healing in distally active UC.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Beclometasona/administração & dosagem , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Enema/métodos , Mesalamina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Indução de Remissão , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Dig Liver Dis ; 37(11): 826-31, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16169304

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is the main reason of failure for H. pylori eradication and beta-lactamases produced by resistant H. pylori strains is a possible mechanism underlying ineffectiveness of an amoxycillin-based triple therapy. AIM: To investigate the benefit of using clavulanic acid associated with amoxycillin compared with amoxycillin alone in a standard triple therapy. METHODS: A total 172 H. pylori-positive dyspeptic patients were randomised to a daily treatment with esomeprazole (20 mg bid), clarithromycin (500 mg bid) and either amoxycillin plus clavulanic acid (1 g bid) or amoxycillin (1 g bid) alone for 1 week. H. pylori status was defined by histology and urea breath test at entry and following 8 weeks from the end of therapy by urea breath test and antigen faecal assessment. RESULTS: At intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis eradication rates achieved by amoxycillin plus clavulanic acid (72 and 78%) were higher, but not significantly, than those achieved by amoxycillin alone triple therapy (62 and 72%). Compliance was good, side-effects mild and with a similar incidence in both regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Clavulanic acid supplemented to amoxycillin-based standard triple therapy does not significantly increase the H. pylori eradication rate with standard triple therapy.


Assuntos
Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Ácido Clavulânico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/enzimologia , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Ácido Clavulânico/farmacologia , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacologia , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Helicobacter pylori/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada
4.
Dig Liver Dis ; 34(11): 787-93, 2002 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12546514

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The association of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalazine) and enema is effective in treatment of mild-moderate forms of ulcerative colitis. However no study has been aimed at determining optimal duration of this association in active ulcerative colitis. AIM: To determine whether longer duration of therapy: 1. increases the rate of patients achieving remission, and 2. reduces relapse rate during the maintenance period in patients in remission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 149 patients, (89 male, 60 female), were randomly assigned to a regimen with 5-aminosalicylic acid tablets 2.4 g/day associated with 5-aminosalycilic enema 2 g/day for a 4-week (n = 73) or 8-week regimen (n = 76). After this acute therapy, patients were submitted to clinical, endoscopic and histological examinations and those in remission were assigned to a follow-up (maintenance) period with oral mesalazine alone at a dosage of 1.2 g/day. A clinical visit, including laboratory tests, at 6 months and an endoscopic-histological control at 12 months were carried out to exclude symptoms and endoscopic-histological signs of activity. Relapse of disease, i.e., presence of clinical symptoms or abnormal laboratory tests, was confirmed by endoscopy and histology. RESULTS: At end of acute phase, clinical, endoscopic and histological remission was comparable in the two groups: 42/76 (55%), in the 4-week, and 47/73 patients (64%), in the 8-week regimen. No difference was found stratifying patients according to extension of disease. Of these 89 patients in remission, 75 (34 from 4-week regimen; 41 from 8-week regimen) completed 12 months' follow-up. At end of follow-up, a similar percentage of patients in the 4-week regimen (50%) and 8-week regimen (51%) were still in remission. No significant difference between cumulative relapse rates of the two groups was found. Stratifying patients according to extension of disease, in the 8-week regimen group, those with left-sided colitis showed a higher remission rate than that of patients with diffuse colitis (66% versus 35%, p < 0.05). All regimens were well tolerated by most patients during the entire study period. CONCLUSIONS: An additional 4 weeks of topical treatment does not increase the remission rate in patients with mild-moderate active ulcerative colitis but seems to reduce the probability of relapse in patients with left-sided colitis.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/prevenção & controle , Mesalamina/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Administração Tópica , Adulto , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colonoscopia , Enema , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Indução de Remissão , Prevenção Secundária , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA