RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic neuropathic pain can be severely disabling and is difficult to treat. The medial thalamus is believed to be involved in the processing of the affective-motivational dimension of pain, and lesioning of the medial thalamus has been used as a potential treatment for neuropathic pain. Within the medial thalamus, the central lateral nucleus has been considered as a target for stereotactic lesioning. OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of central lateral thalamotomy using Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for the treatment of neuropathic pain. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with neuropathic pain who underwent central lateral thalamotomy using GKRS. We report on patient outcomes, including changes in pain scores using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Barrow Neurological Institute pain intensity score, and adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent central lateral thalamotomy using GKRS between 2014 and 2021. Meaningful pain reduction occurred in 12 patients (57%) after a median period of 3 months and persisted in 7 patients (33%) at the last follow-up (the median follow-up was 28 months). Rates of pain reduction at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 48%, 48%, 19%, and 19%, respectively. Meaningful pain reduction occurred more frequently in patients with trigeminal deafferentation pain compared with all other patients (P = .009). No patient had treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Central lateral thalamotomy using GKRS is remarkably safe. Pain reduction after this procedure occurs in a subset of patients and is more frequent in those with trigeminal deafferentation pain; however, pain recurs frequently over time.
Assuntos
Causalgia , Radiocirurgia , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Seguimentos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Causalgia/etiologia , Causalgia/cirurgia , Tálamo/cirurgia , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo/cirurgia , Dor/cirurgiaRESUMO
Medial thalamotomy using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a potential treatment for intractable pain. However, the ideal treatment parameters and expected outcomes from this procedure remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to provide further insights on medial thalamotomy using SRS, specifically for intractable pain. A systematic review was performed to identify all clinical articles discussing medial thalamotomy using SRS for intractable pain. Only studies in which SRS was used to target the medial thalamus for pain were included. For centers with multiple publications, care was taken to avoid recounting individual patients. The literature review revealed six studies describing outcomes of medial thalamotomy using SRS for a total of 125 patients (118 included in the outcome analysis). Fifty-two patients were treated for cancer pain across three studies, whereas five studies included 73 patients who were treated for nonmalignant pain. The individual studies demonstrated initial meaningful pain reduction in 43.3-100% of patients, with an aggregate initial meaningful pain reduction in 65 patients (55%) following SRS medial thalamotomy. This effect persisted in 45 patients (38%) at the last follow-up. Adverse events were observed in six patients (5%), which were related to radiation in five patients (4%). Medial thalamotomy using SRS is effective for select patients with treatment-resistant pain and is remarkably safe when modern radiation delivery platforms are used. More posteriorly placed lesions within the medial thalamus were associated with better pain relief. More studies are warranted to shed light on differences in patient responses.