Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 73(4): 471-480, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32003204

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of incidental prostate cancer (IPCA) in a contemporary cohort of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) patients who underwent trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS: A series of 458 consecutive patients who underwent TURP were evaluated between January 2016 to June 2018. Evaluated factors included age (years), Body Mass Index (BMI; kg/square meters), treatment with inhibitors of 5-alpha reductase, previous prostate biopsies, basal prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels (ng/mL), serum leukocyte count (×109/L), weight of resected prostate tissue (grams), grade and stage of IPCA. The multivariate logistic regression model evaluated associations of significant clinical factors with the risk of IPCA. RESULTS: Overall, IPCA was detected in 30 of 454 patients (6.6%). A mean of 21.8 g of tissue was resected. The mean number of positive chips was 5.6 (mean percentage 3.9%) with tumor grade group 1 in 22 cases (73.4%) and tumor stage cT1a in 23 patients (76.7%). On multivariate analysis, independent factors that were positively associated with the risk of IPCA were BMI (odds ratio, OR=1.121; P=0.017) and leukocyte count (OR=1.144; P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing TURP for the treatment of LUTS, the risk of IPCA was not negligible with a rate of being 6.6%. BMI and serum leukocyte count were found to be independent factors that were positively associated with the risk of IPCA.


Assuntos
Hiperplasia Prostática , Neoplasias da Próstata , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Hiperplasia Prostática/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/efeitos adversos
2.
J Endourol ; 33(4): 295-301, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30484332

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determinate benefits of the combination of local anesthetic wounds infiltration and ultrasound transversus abdominal plane (US-TAP) block with ropivacaine on postoperative pain, early recovery, and hospital stay in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: The study is double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Our hypothesis was that the combination of wound infiltration and US-TAP block with ropivacaine would decrease immediate postoperative pain and opioids use. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain and opioids demand during the hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were nausea/vomiting rate, stool passing time, use of prokinetics, length of hospital stay (LOS), and 30-days readmission to the hospital for pain or other US-TAP block-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients who underwent RARP were eligible for the analysis; 57 received the US-TAP block with 20 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine (US-TAP block group) and 43 did not receive US-TAP block (no-US-TAP group). All the patients received the local wound anesthetic infiltration with 20 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine. US-TAP block group showed a decreased mean Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) within 12 hours after surgery (1.6 vs 2.6; p = 0.02) and mean NRS (1.8 vs 2.7; p = 0.04) with lesser number of patients who used opioid (3.5% vs 18.6%; p = 0.01) during the first 24 hours. Moreover, we found a shorter mean LOS (4.27 vs 4.72, days; p = 0.04) with a lower requirement of prokinetics administration during the hospital stay (21% vs 72%; p < 0.001). No US-TAP block-related complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Combination of anesthetic wound infiltration and US-TAP block with ropivacaine as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen can be safely offered to patients undergoing RARP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. It improves the immediate postoperative pain control, reducing opioids administration and is associated to a decreased use of prokinetics and shorter hospital stay.


Assuntos
Músculos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Idoso , Analgésicos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Período Perioperatório , Período Pós-Operatório , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Robótica , Ropivacaina/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA