RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a seasonally recurrent type of major depression. This predictable aspect makes it promising for preventive treatment. However, evidence for the efficacy and harm of preventive treatment of SAD is scarce, as are recommendations from clinical practice guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess the current use of preventive treatment of SAD in clinical practice in German-speaking countries for the first time. METHODS: We conducted a postal and web-based survey sent to the heads of all psychiatric institutions listed in the inventory "Deutsches Krankenhaus Adressbuch, 2015" that contains all psychiatric hospitals in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. RESULTS: One hundred institutions (out of 533 institutions, 19%), which treated in total more than 3100 SAD patients in the years 2014/2015, responded. Of those, 81 reported recommending preventive treatment to patients with a history of SAD. There was no consensus on the optimal starting point for preventive treatment. Most of the institutions that implemented prevention of SAD, recommended lifestyle changes (85%), antidepressants (84%), psychotherapy (73%), and light therapy (72%) to their patients. The situation was similar in northern and southern regions. CONCLUSIONS: Most hospitals recommended the use of preventive treatment to SAD patients, although evidence on efficacy and harm is limited. A wide variety of interventions were recommended, although guidelines only include recommendations for acute treatment. To assist psychiatrists and patients in future decision making, controlled studies on preventive treatment for SAD that compare different interventions with one another are needed.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Fototerapia/métodos , Transtorno Afetivo Sazonal/terapia , Adulto , Áustria , Feminino , Alemanha , Hospitais Psiquiátricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psiquiatria , Psicoterapia , SuíçaRESUMO
Six hundred ten patients with seasonal affective disorder (SAD) were diagnosed and treated at the university hospitals for psychiatry in Bonn, Germany (1989-1992) and Vienna, Austria (1993-2001). The aim of this study was to compare our sample with other SAD populations in the literature and to investigate differences between the two study locations. We found female:male sex ratios of 5.0:1.0 in unipolar depressives and 1.5:1.0 in patients with bipolar affective disorder. Of our patients, 21.7% suffered from bipolar II disorder, and 1.3% were diagnosed as having bipolar I. Our patients obtained a mean global seasonality score (GSS) of 15.4. Women had a higher GSS than men (t = 2.127, P = 0.035), and Viennese patients had higher scores than patients in Bonn (t = 3.104, P = 0.002). Totals of 66.3% of all patients suffered from atypical depression and 17.8% from melancholic depression. Patients with atypical depression were more frequent in Vienna, whereas patients with melancholic depression predominated in Bonn (chi 2 = 54.952, df = 2, P < 0.001). The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients described in this article confirm the findings of other epidemiological investigations obtained in non-German-speaking samples.
Assuntos
Transtorno Afetivo Sazonal/epidemiologia , Adulto , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Áustria/epidemiologia , Transtorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Transtorno Bipolar/psicologia , Terapia Combinada , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fototerapia , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Transtorno Afetivo Sazonal/diagnóstico , Transtorno Afetivo Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Afetivo Sazonal/psicologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study are to provide estimates of clinical and demographic variables of patients with seasonal affective disorder (SAD) in Germany and Austria, to compare our results with those of previously published SAD studies, and to find out whether the clinical pattern of SAD remained stable over several years. METHOD: We investigated 610 SAD patients from the outpatient clinics in Bonn (n = 190) and Vienna (n = 420). Patients in Bonn were recruited in the fall-winter season of the years 1989-1992, those in Vienna in the years 1993-2001. RESULTS: We observed a change in the clinical pattern in our patients: patients from Bonn, who were diagnosed and treated about 5 years earlier, were more likely to suffer from melancholic depression, whereas Viennese patients rather suffered from atypical depression (chi(2) = 54.952, df = 2, p < 0.001). The symptoms of hypersomnia, daytime fatigue, increased eating and carbohydrate-craving were more frequent in the Viennese sample, anxiety and deterioration of patients' capacity to perform at work predominated in Bonn. In addition, patients from Vienna obtained a higher GSS (global seasonality score, measured by the SPAQ - Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire) than those from Bonn (15.7 +/- 3.3 and 14.6 +/- 4.1 respectively; t = 3.104, p = 0.002). Taken together, our results were in good accordance to other published SAD materials, but we were able to demonstrate that our patients reported "feeling worst" (measured by item 13H of the SPAQ) in November and December, whereas SAD patients in the USA clearly had their worst months in January and February. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that an increase in awareness of fall-winter depression in the last decade by both doctors, who referred patients, as well as patients or the entire population must have caused patients to sign up for light therapy at the Viennese SAD clinic because of having heard about the atypical symptom profile. This increased awareness of SAD can also be measured by a statistically significant reduction in the diagnostic latency (from the age of onset to the diagnosis of SAD) when comparing the two study locations.